It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Congressman implies armed insurrection if president does not obey the Constitution

page: 7
16
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:49 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss


The kids or the dogs? I guess it's both.

It's sadly just less stuff to shoot when the insurrection starts and I get to be the true internet tough guy I always wanted to be.




posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: DJW001

Oh come now! Tons of people took Trump seriously on everything he said whether they should have or not and continue to. You don't get to cry foul on this.

I think you'd be rather hard-pressed to find many people who actually agree with taking weapons first, & pulling due process later, though. It starts with taking the bats# folks' guns after a simple phone call. Then normal folks, too, just takes someone with an axe to grind to create a lot of personal chaos.

Even I disagree with this idea. Tightening & doing more thorough mental health screenings is more fair to all, no bones about it.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:50 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Culturally speaking, how do you propose this take place?

Uhder whose cultural regime will we operate? What will you tell all the other cultures? How do you make a set of laws that fits all those different cultures or do you just tell a bunch of them they're SOL?

You understand some places are the way they are because of their cultures, right? That means some of the third world hell holes are third world hell holes because of the cultures of the people and not many other reasons. Are you going to protect those cultures or erase them for the greater good? Those cultures have proven remarkably resilient in the face of modernity so far.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: WarPig1939

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: WarPig1939
a reply to: burgerbuddy


You go right ahead and be that guy and be a "hero". I will be watching you and whatever band of misfits you decided to join get collectively arrested.


The only side I fight for is the one for the people, by the people. There is no red vs blue.




Really? No RvsB?

Why do you hate your country?

You gonna roll over? Get a pink hat?

They will make you wear one, ya know.

Then it will be too late.

Hope you like kale sushi.





I don't fall for cheap thrills like some randumb congressman trying to score political points by advocating violence through divisiveness.

Go ahead and fight the cause. You would be helping the government in their goals to control the population even further.




Some nutjob is gonna run with his BS and shoot up another softball game.

Don't look at me when the SHTF.

Got the bombs in Austin now.

We'll see who's behind them.




posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:51 AM
link   
That second amendment you all are so fond of was installed in the constitution in part to protect us against a tyrannical government.
The colonists were in fact armed to fight the army's of king George. The second amendment was modeled after the english bill of rights which gave us that right to bear arms before we were even a country. Again to protect against a tyrannical government. So....



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

The problem is that no one trusts government.

Do you?

I don't.

So how do you trust them to make these definitions. I might ordinarily agree with this except you've got government all tangled up in it and when you get them involved in deciding what is or is not nuts and they've got their political agendas and we've seen all the "studies" about who or what is and isn't insane, psychopathic, etc., I can't trust them.

Partisanship will creep in.

That's the big problem I have with all this.

I just don't trust them.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:52 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Who says you can't shoot the drowned bodies of puppies and children or even the turtles that you fed them to? You can have the best of both worlds, you just have to be creative.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: joemoe


Let's see, most of the left want to ban the tools they now want to use to overthrow the government?


You clearly know nothing about what "the left" believes. All you have are echoes from your echo chamber. You cannot even tell whether or not someone is being sarcastic.


Show us an action Trump has taken that is unconstitutional.


Accepting foreign money is called "emolument," and is an impeachable offense. Ordering the Justice Department to pursue political opponents is an abuse of power, fitting the definitions of "high crimes and misdemeanors," also impeachable. Then, of course, there are ongoing violations committed by previous chief executives, such as maintaining a standing army.



Got the Proof?

Send it on to mueller or the NYT.




posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
That second amendment you all are so fond of was installed in the constitution in part to protect us against a tyrannical government.
The colonists were in fact armed to fight the army's of king George. The second amendment was modeled after the english bill of rights which gave us that right to bear arms before we were even a country. Again to protect against a tyrannical government. So....


But we have to save the children, so it was never intended for modern times and assault rifles right?



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
That second amendment you all are so fond of was installed in the constitution in part to protect us against a tyrannical government.
The colonists were in fact armed to fight the army's of king George. The second amendment was modeled after the english bill of rights which gave us that right to bear arms before we were even a country. Again to protect against a tyrannical government. So....


A Democrat actually admitting to this?!?!?

I'm going to have this framed. First I just need to find a silly frame to put it into....



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:54 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I know. My computer about blew up ...



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:54 AM
link   
Always remember that Socialism absolutely oppresses Hermits.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:54 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

So, f# it, due process later.

Gotcha, Ket. Thanks for being honest with everyone, as much as you're beating around the bush.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: ketsuko


Like how socialism is really sharing and caring and will provide a wonderful, awesome first world rich standard of living for everyone it touches?


Do you know why we don't get very many illegal immigrants from Norway?



They have no clue how to cut grass?




posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah


Nope, due process is highly overrated, it's about time we got proactive instead of reactive. After we ditch that pesky issue we can also come up with a really nice state-sponsored religion, I'm thinking Cthulhu-ism.

Just don't touch that Amendment on hooch otherwise I may start shooting.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Who says you can't shoot the drowned bodies of puppies and children or even the turtles that you fed them to? You can have the best of both worlds, you just have to be creative.


Well, if we're trying to be humane here first you shoot, then you drown, then you feed to turtle.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:55 AM
link   
a reply to: WarPig1939

It's wouldn't be a civil war. It would be a revolution.
That is in our blood.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:56 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko


I am well aware you don't think highly of me and that doesn't bother me.


Because I do not think highly of your opinions does not mean I do not think highly of you. You are entitled to your opinions, even if we disagree.


The problem I have with globalization is the attempt to make the governance pools ever larger and more dilute. There are scant protections for the individual in it.


The example of the United States proves that it is possible to create a federal system that balances the needs of society with the rights of individuals. International agreements are a form of wider federalism. Agreements that protect the environment protect your environment. Agreements that protect human rights protect yur human rights.

There will never be a One World Government because the world is too big and complex for top down management. That is the lesson of Soviet government. Society is an organism with mutually nurturing parts, not a machine that requires outside programming.

The nationalism that is threatening to tear the international order apart and set the world on the path to war is a reaction to the overwhelming complexity of the modern world. It is based on fear. Fear of change. Fear of the unknown.



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Lol..


Got to love those keyboard tough guys don’t ya ? Lol



posted on Mar, 19 2018 @ 08:57 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Triggered much.

Come at me bro?
Really?
Lol.

edit on 3192018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
16
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join