It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: burgerbuddy
Yeah, I like her better than Hannity. Nicer legs.
Not to mention I trust her more. I have caught Hannity going extreme a few times, which is why I always try to independently verify what he says. Ingraham seems a little closer to truth.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Pyle
This has more to do with positioning than leverage.
By taking the pension, he starts way behind and can't afford to delay and wait (theoretically).
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
Hahaha, you just reiterated the exact same statement I rebutted, and even quoted the rebuttal in your post. I can see you either won't read my post or can't figure it out... either way, nice talking to you.
I do suggest you keep an eye on the next wave of targets... I'm thinking Comey, Lynch, and possibly Mueller. You might find what happens enlightening.
TheRedneck
I think you missed the point. Them taking his pension means he has no reason to flip and work with them. They took their best bargaining chip and threw it in the trash in some crazy display of power to scare lower level FBI officials.
Also he isnt hurting for cash as his wife is doing pretty well as a doctor, if I am not mistaken, so there is another failure of your crazy ideas that its to bankrupt him into submission.
She might still have some of the 750K hillary gave her.
Maybe but I dont know Virginia election finance laws. So they may or may not be able to use those funds if any are left.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
Hahaha, you just reiterated the exact same statement I rebutted, and even quoted the rebuttal in your post. I can see you either won't read my post or can't figure it out... either way, nice talking to you.
I do suggest you keep an eye on the next wave of targets... I'm thinking Comey, Lynch, and possibly Mueller. You might find what happens enlightening.
TheRedneck
I think you missed the point. Them taking his pension means he has no reason to flip and work with them. They took their best bargaining chip and threw it in the trash in some crazy display of power to scare lower level FBI officials.
Also he isnt hurting for cash as his wife is doing pretty well as a doctor, if I am not mistaken, so there is another failure of your crazy ideas that its to bankrupt him into submission.
She might still have some of the 750K hillary gave her.
Maybe but I dont know Virginia election finance laws. So they may or may not be able to use those funds if any are left.
Oh yeah she can keep her war chest.
That's the problem. lol.
Payoff!!
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
Hahaha, you just reiterated the exact same statement I rebutted, and even quoted the rebuttal in your post. I can see you either won't read my post or can't figure it out... either way, nice talking to you.
I do suggest you keep an eye on the next wave of targets... I'm thinking Comey, Lynch, and possibly Mueller. You might find what happens enlightening.
TheRedneck
I think you missed the point. Them taking his pension means he has no reason to flip and work with them. They took their best bargaining chip and threw it in the trash in some crazy display of power to scare lower level FBI officials.
Also he isnt hurting for cash as his wife is doing pretty well as a doctor, if I am not mistaken, so there is another failure of your crazy ideas that its to bankrupt him into submission.
She might still have some of the 750K hillary gave her.
Maybe but I dont know Virginia election finance laws. So they may or may not be able to use those funds if any are left.
Oh yeah she can keep her war chest.
That's the problem. lol.
Payoff!!
You keep claiming that and yet have never show how the Virginia Democrats headed by the Virginia Governor donating to a Virginia State Senate candidate from the same party is a bribe from Clinton. Nor have you shown that she broke Virginia State Campaign Finance laws and is using that money.... Maybe you should source your claims?
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
Let me try to explain this another way... option A and option B.
Option A:Sessions fires McCabe over allegations of criminal charges. The standard for removing a person's pension are high; it cannot be done over an allegation. Even if Sessions were to file an indictment today, it would likely be months before the case went to trial. In the meantime, McCabe has his retirement money, so he has more money to hire lawyers. A lawyer can extend a case for years easily just by challenging and making requests to the court. It costs money, but so what? McCabe has an extra $2 mil to spend. After a few years, the case has cooled, political realities might have changed, and McCabe has a real chance of getting off even if he is guilty. He has no incentive other than lawyers' fees to make a deal, and we're talking about outing people who can be easily connected to higher ups like Hillary Clinton. People who implicate anyone with dirt on her tend to have accidents on a regular basis... fatal accidents. I don't think McCabe wants to have a fatal accident.
Option B:Sessions fires McCabe over a recommendation from the OPR. That quallifies to both fire McCabe and to remove his pension, and does not require a trial. Now McCabe does not have that extra $2 mil to pay lawyers. Sessions then proceeds with indictments. McCabe certainly will have enough money to defend himself, but not to drag the case out over years. Therefore, if he is offered a plea bargain to turn state's evidence against Lynch, Comey, etc., he has a choice: go to jail for a very long time, essentially the rest of his life, or turn state's evidence.
The incentive is to avoid prosecution. People turn state's evidence all the time in exchange for lighter sentences, sometimes a suspended sentence, when they have no money at all depending on the outcome of the case.
Maybe you just can't wrap your head around the fact that McCabe's actions were illegal. He is looking at two punishments: losing his retirement, and spending the rest of his productive life behind bars. The latter is greater incentive to cooperate than the former, especially when one has already lost the former.
I don't know how much clearer I can make it...
TheRedneck
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
Hahaha, you just reiterated the exact same statement I rebutted, and even quoted the rebuttal in your post. I can see you either won't read my post or can't figure it out... either way, nice talking to you.
I do suggest you keep an eye on the next wave of targets... I'm thinking Comey, Lynch, and possibly Mueller. You might find what happens enlightening.
TheRedneck
I think you missed the point. Them taking his pension means he has no reason to flip and work with them. They took their best bargaining chip and threw it in the trash in some crazy display of power to scare lower level FBI officials.
Also he isnt hurting for cash as his wife is doing pretty well as a doctor, if I am not mistaken, so there is another failure of your crazy ideas that its to bankrupt him into submission.
She might still have some of the 750K hillary gave her.
Maybe but I dont know Virginia election finance laws. So they may or may not be able to use those funds if any are left.
Oh yeah she can keep her war chest.
That's the problem. lol.
Payoff!!
You keep claiming that and yet have never show how the Virginia Democrats headed by the Virginia Governor donating to a Virginia State Senate candidate from the same party is a bribe from Clinton. Nor have you shown that she broke Virginia State Campaign Finance laws and is using that money.... Maybe you should source your claims?
No bribe?!
You #tin me?
Everyone knows how much she got.
And the election money laws where she failed.
Don't deny ignorance.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
Let me try to explain this another way... option A and option B.
Option A:Sessions fires McCabe over allegations of criminal charges. The standard for removing a person's pension are high; it cannot be done over an allegation. Even if Sessions were to file an indictment today, it would likely be months before the case went to trial. In the meantime, McCabe has his retirement money, so he has more money to hire lawyers. A lawyer can extend a case for years easily just by challenging and making requests to the court. It costs money, but so what? McCabe has an extra $2 mil to spend. After a few years, the case has cooled, political realities might have changed, and McCabe has a real chance of getting off even if he is guilty. He has no incentive other than lawyers' fees to make a deal, and we're talking about outing people who can be easily connected to higher ups like Hillary Clinton. People who implicate anyone with dirt on her tend to have accidents on a regular basis... fatal accidents. I don't think McCabe wants to have a fatal accident.
Option B:Sessions fires McCabe over a recommendation from the OPR. That quallifies to both fire McCabe and to remove his pension, and does not require a trial. Now McCabe does not have that extra $2 mil to pay lawyers. Sessions then proceeds with indictments. McCabe certainly will have enough money to defend himself, but not to drag the case out over years. Therefore, if he is offered a plea bargain to turn state's evidence against Lynch, Comey, etc., he has a choice: go to jail for a very long time, essentially the rest of his life, or turn state's evidence.
The incentive is to avoid prosecution. People turn state's evidence all the time in exchange for lighter sentences, sometimes a suspended sentence, when they have no money at all depending on the outcome of the case.
Maybe you just can't wrap your head around the fact that McCabe's actions were illegal. He is looking at two punishments: losing his retirement, and spending the rest of his productive life behind bars. The latter is greater incentive to cooperate than the former, especially when one has already lost the former.
I don't know how much clearer I can make it...
TheRedneck
A) As seen in B they dont need to prove criminality to remove the pension. So the rest is just BS to dig yourself out of the hole you dug.
B)People seem to forget his wife is a well off doctor with political aspirations that suddenly has a huge great platform to fight Trump administration and gain political points from her husband fighting the firing. So this option leading to charges falls flat as hell because without the pension on the line they have no reason not to fight back and drag it out bringinga wrongful termination suit.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
Hahaha, you just reiterated the exact same statement I rebutted, and even quoted the rebuttal in your post. I can see you either won't read my post or can't figure it out... either way, nice talking to you.
I do suggest you keep an eye on the next wave of targets... I'm thinking Comey, Lynch, and possibly Mueller. You might find what happens enlightening.
TheRedneck
I think you missed the point. Them taking his pension means he has no reason to flip and work with them. They took their best bargaining chip and threw it in the trash in some crazy display of power to scare lower level FBI officials.
Also he isnt hurting for cash as his wife is doing pretty well as a doctor, if I am not mistaken, so there is another failure of your crazy ideas that its to bankrupt him into submission.
She might still have some of the 750K hillary gave her.
Maybe but I dont know Virginia election finance laws. So they may or may not be able to use those funds if any are left.
Oh yeah she can keep her war chest.
That's the problem. lol.
Payoff!!
You keep claiming that and yet have never show how the Virginia Democrats headed by the Virginia Governor donating to a Virginia State Senate candidate from the same party is a bribe from Clinton. Nor have you shown that she broke Virginia State Campaign Finance laws and is using that money.... Maybe you should source your claims?
No bribe?!
You #tin me?
Everyone knows how much she got.
And the election money laws where she failed.
Don't deny ignorance.
www.vpap.org...
Which donation is the bribe?
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
Let me try to explain this another way... option A and option B.
Option A:Sessions fires McCabe over allegations of criminal charges. The standard for removing a person's pension are high; it cannot be done over an allegation. Even if Sessions were to file an indictment today, it would likely be months before the case went to trial. In the meantime, McCabe has his retirement money, so he has more money to hire lawyers. A lawyer can extend a case for years easily just by challenging and making requests to the court. It costs money, but so what? McCabe has an extra $2 mil to spend. After a few years, the case has cooled, political realities might have changed, and McCabe has a real chance of getting off even if he is guilty. He has no incentive other than lawyers' fees to make a deal, and we're talking about outing people who can be easily connected to higher ups like Hillary Clinton. People who implicate anyone with dirt on her tend to have accidents on a regular basis... fatal accidents. I don't think McCabe wants to have a fatal accident.
Option B:Sessions fires McCabe over a recommendation from the OPR. That quallifies to both fire McCabe and to remove his pension, and does not require a trial. Now McCabe does not have that extra $2 mil to pay lawyers. Sessions then proceeds with indictments. McCabe certainly will have enough money to defend himself, but not to drag the case out over years. Therefore, if he is offered a plea bargain to turn state's evidence against Lynch, Comey, etc., he has a choice: go to jail for a very long time, essentially the rest of his life, or turn state's evidence.
The incentive is to avoid prosecution. People turn state's evidence all the time in exchange for lighter sentences, sometimes a suspended sentence, when they have no money at all depending on the outcome of the case.
Maybe you just can't wrap your head around the fact that McCabe's actions were illegal. He is looking at two punishments: losing his retirement, and spending the rest of his productive life behind bars. The latter is greater incentive to cooperate than the former, especially when one has already lost the former.
I don't know how much clearer I can make it...
TheRedneck
A) As seen in B they dont need to prove criminality to remove the pension. So the rest is just BS to dig yourself out of the hole you dug.
B)People seem to forget his wife is a well off doctor with political aspirations that suddenly has a huge great platform to fight Trump administration and gain political points from her husband fighting the firing. So this option leading to charges falls flat as hell because without the pension on the line they have no reason not to fight back and drag it out bringinga wrongful termination suit.
He's still disgraced and going to jail, # her.
OK? Need a cookie?
Still going with that BS?
Wrongful termination? The guy is s #in lawyer, even he won't try that BS.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
Hahaha, you just reiterated the exact same statement I rebutted, and even quoted the rebuttal in your post. I can see you either won't read my post or can't figure it out... either way, nice talking to you.
I do suggest you keep an eye on the next wave of targets... I'm thinking Comey, Lynch, and possibly Mueller. You might find what happens enlightening.
TheRedneck
I think you missed the point. Them taking his pension means he has no reason to flip and work with them. They took their best bargaining chip and threw it in the trash in some crazy display of power to scare lower level FBI officials.
Also he isnt hurting for cash as his wife is doing pretty well as a doctor, if I am not mistaken, so there is another failure of your crazy ideas that its to bankrupt him into submission.
She might still have some of the 750K hillary gave her.
Maybe but I dont know Virginia election finance laws. So they may or may not be able to use those funds if any are left.
Oh yeah she can keep her war chest.
That's the problem. lol.
Payoff!!
You keep claiming that and yet have never show how the Virginia Democrats headed by the Virginia Governor donating to a Virginia State Senate candidate from the same party is a bribe from Clinton. Nor have you shown that she broke Virginia State Campaign Finance laws and is using that money.... Maybe you should source your claims?
No bribe?!
You #tin me?
Everyone knows how much she got.
And the election money laws where she failed.
Don't deny ignorance.
www.vpap.org...
Which donation is the bribe?
Who cares?
she gets to keep whatever is left over.
At the time he was investigating hills emails when she got the money and he didn't declare it.
Dirty dog.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Don't worry... his wife can pay for his upkeep from the bribery money funneled to her by Democrats.
This guy should have been arrested.. not fired.
Rosenstein must go next.
As seen in B they dont need to prove criminality to remove the pension.
People seem to forget his wife is a well off doctor with political aspirations that suddenly has a huge great platform to fight Trump administration and gain political points from her husband fighting the firing.
If the OIG and OPR recommended criminal charges...