It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bennu is an asteroid ironically named after the Egyptian phoenix-like deity of rebirth. The irony lies in the 1 in 2,700 chance that this 174-billion-pound flying object, which orbits the sun at a cool 63,000 mph, will come crashing to Earth on Sept. 21, 2135.
If Bennu came for us, impact would mean a 1.15-gigaton blast of energy that would make hydrogen bombs look like party poppers. Buzzfeed News found out this is why the government now has an official plan to nuke the asteroid before it ever hurtles through Earth’s atmosphere.
Enter the Hypervelocity Asteroid Mitigation Mission for Emergency Response or HAMMER, which has the most appropriate acronym ever for this kind of situation. NASA, the National Security Administration, and two Energy Department weapons labs have brainstormed this massive asteroid deflector and destroyer. While it only exists as a design right now, it would either deflect a smaller asteroid with an 8.8-ton impactor or blast the everloving space dust out of a larger one with a nuclear device.
“If the asteroid is small enough, and we detect it early enough, we can do it with the impactor,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory physicist David Dearborn told BuzzFeed News. “The impactor is not as flexible as the nuclear option when we really want to change the speed of the body in a hurry.”
Having the design for an asteroid blaster floating around doesn’t necessarily mean it will get realized in three dimensions. The best weapon we have against an asteroid is the time to figure out what to do with it, but as interstellar asteroid ‘Oumuamua proved recently, sometimes objects in space can seem to materialize out of nowhere. The only way to save humanity from one of these if it was zooming straight for our planet would be to give it a nuclear sendoff.
Unfortunately, making asteroids explode would be expensive even by NASA standards. The space agency remains secretive about exactly how much it would cost to make HAMMER a reality, but its OSIRIS-Rex mission, now en route to Bennu, set them back by $800 million.
L'an mil neuf cent nonante neuf sept mois,
Du ciel viendra un grand Roi d'effrayeur:
Ressusciter le grand Roi d'Angolmois,
Avant après Mars regner par bonheur.
In the year 1999, in the seventh month,
from the sky will come the great King of Terror,
bringing back to life the great King of the Mongols.
Before and after, Mars to reign by good fortune.,
originally posted by: underwerks
By 2135 we'll probably be living in the dirt and worshipping the satellites that pass overhead at night as gods. At the rate we're going now, anyway.
originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
But what are the real chances of success if the day comes that NASA does nuke this SOB like they nuked the moon?
originally posted by: lordcomac
So, the thing here is.... we have very little data about how a nuke would actually work in space.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
We went from the horse and buggy to the moon in 80 years..
originally posted by: Infinitis
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
We went from the horse and buggy to the moon in 80 years..
Interesting way of looking at that, but the horse and buggy have been around since at least the late 18th century. Modes of transportation prior to the "buggy" were pretty much identical except used a less sophisticated carriage device. And that had been the main transport in most the world (for land travel) for centuries to millennia.
It's more accurate that we spent thousands of years using the horse and buggy or animal and carriage method before figuring out something more effective.