posted on Mar, 14 2018 @ 01:50 PM
a reply to: Krazysh0t
How long have you been running campaigns, just curious? Because they have been done this way for decades and decades, costing many tens of millions
(or hundreds of millions) and thousands of support staff canvassing and moving around the country attending events.
Simple fact is that the Internet isn't as important as some of you folks want others to believe. Any person who didn't already know social media
shouldn't be believed as a source of news is too dangerous to vote IMHO. It is simply not possible to swing a national election on the extremely tiny
scale at which these individuals ALLEGEDLY peddled disinformation.
The organic Americans who were actually "fixing the record" about Hillary pre-election (thousands of anti-Hillary DNC->RNC people did this via social
media) were not "Russians." They were average American voters who were fighting back against Hillary's same efforts: Correct the record, among many
many private organizations she hired to peddle propaganda via the web. I reiterate, a majority of those engaging in these groups knew one another
face to face, and met regularly in person
Had zero to do with Russia or any other country. This is a cop out, for a failure candidate maintaining her failure status.
I also must point out that indictments are not evidence nor are they convictions. Ergo, presumptive innocence holds true until proven guilty in a
court of law. The "trolls" are not established fact. It is not established fact that any nation or individual "meddled" in the election. Can you
define meddling, anyhow? Because at first you said "Collusion" Then you said "Hacking" then "meddling" so which is it?
Can you stop moving the goal posts every other paragraph?
One shred of evidence would be great
edit on 3/14/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)