It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
We can all just stop using youtube if we don't like it.
originally posted by: NerdGoddess
So YT thinks Wikipedia is a credible source? I recall we were absolutely BANNED from using wikipedia as any source in High School. The teachers would straight up laugh at you like "Okay, what's your next reference, SNOPES? hahahahahaha"
-Alee
originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: loam
there are alot of awful videos out there that make the craziest claims.
for adults with common sense and willing to research it is easily debunked, but for young children or the less smart i can see it being a good thing even if it is wiki, it's a starting point for research.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
originally posted by: NerdGoddess
So YT thinks Wikipedia is a credible source? I recall we were absolutely BANNED from using wikipedia as any source in High School. The teachers would straight up laugh at you like "Okay, what's your next reference, SNOPES? hahahahahaha"
-Alee
And lemme guess, you got straight A’s from using sources like natural news?
Hahahhahaha
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: NerdGoddess
So YT thinks Wikipedia is a credible source? I recall we were absolutely BANNED from using wikipedia as any source in High School. The teachers would straight up laugh at you like "Okay, what's your next reference, SNOPES? hahahahahaha"
-Alee
The teachers lost that argument when Wikipedia started having extensive lists of credible sources on them. I actually took a class last semester where we were encouraged to use Wikipedia, not to quote from directly (because we couldn't properly cite who wrote any given sentence rather than credibility) but rather to reference all their sources.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: NerdGoddess
The guy who runs natural news, Mike Adams is one of the biggest purveyors of snake oil and pseudoscience on the inter webs.
originally posted by: NerdGoddess
That's really interesting, thanks for replying with that information. I have been out of school for 10 years, so when I hear Wikipedia as a source I chuckle remembering those teachers.
-Alee
originally posted by: Aazadan
The teachers lost that argument when Wikipedia started having extensive lists of credible sources on them. I actually took a class last semester where we were encouraged to use Wikipedia, not to quote from directly (because we couldn't properly cite who wrote any given sentence rather than credibility) but rather to reference all their sources.
It actually makes more sense if you look at Wikipedia as articles having extensive lists of credible sources. Sure the user-generated content will always be somewhat suspect, so if you want just skip that and go straight to the list of credible sources provided. And even 10 years ago if you cited the credible sources listed in wikipedia instead of wikipedia itself, that would have been OK, right?
originally posted by: NerdGoddess
That's really interesting, thanks for replying with that information. I have been out of school for 10 years, so when I hear Wikipedia as a source I chuckle remembering those teachers.
-Alee