It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
But secondly, and even more incredibly, Colnbrook Detention Centre is a male-only holding Centre...
So either she is mistaken as to where they kept her, or is totally full of bollocks.
en.m.wikipedia.org...
It includes a Short Term Holding Centre, where both women and men are held, usually for a few days. There is also a unit for women called ‘Sahara Unit’ with a capacity of twenty women.
originally posted by: oddnutz
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
But secondly, and even more incredibly, Colnbrook Detention Centre is a male-only holding Centre...
So either she is mistaken as to where they kept her, or is totally full of bollocks.
en.m.wikipedia.org...
It includes a Short Term Holding Centre, where both women and men are held, usually for a few days. There is also a unit for women called ‘Sahara Unit’ with a capacity of twenty women.
detentionaction.org.uk...
i hope no one took what you wrote as gospel or they would be misinformed.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
OMG!!!
You losers arrest us?!
Where is Trubrit?!
Ok payback for steel is coming.
Your stupid MI6 will suffer.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
OMG!!!
You losers arrest us?!
Where is Trubrit?!
Ok payback for steel is coming.
Your stupid MI6 will suffer.
One wonders whether the complete cowards who made this decision have the balls to arrest the US President when he visits...
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: DISRAELI
originally posted by: UKTruth
What is this country coming to when we detain people for opinions???
I would like to see the official reason for the detention. It might not have been put in those terms.
I suspect it will have been under the public safety remit where they believe there is a risk of incitement of violence.
People can argue about the right or wrong of that, but I suspect many of those complaining would be the first to applaud if it was an Islamic preacher detained for the same reason.
Well one is just a journalist, with whom one can agree or disagree with. The other leads a group of people along their line of thinking. Should that Imam believe in Jihad against the west, at least some might develop those same beliefs. Of course in both instances proof is required before detainment. Its really apples to oranges, but nice try.
Nope completely comparable preaching hate is preaching hate
originally posted by: Reydelsol
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: DISRAELI
originally posted by: UKTruth
What is this country coming to when we detain people for opinions???
I would like to see the official reason for the detention. It might not have been put in those terms.
I suspect it will have been under the public safety remit where they believe there is a risk of incitement of violence.
People can argue about the right or wrong of that, but I suspect many of those complaining would be the first to applaud if it was an Islamic preacher detained for the same reason.
Well one is just a journalist, with whom one can agree or disagree with. The other leads a group of people along their line of thinking. Should that Imam believe in Jihad against the west, at least some might develop those same beliefs. Of course in both instances proof is required before detainment. Its really apples to oranges, but nice try.
Nope completely comparable preaching hate is preaching hate
How the holy F**K is giving a lecture on free speech anything to do with hate preaching?
Blasphemy Blasphemy is the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence to a deity, to religious or holy persons or sacred things, or toward something considered sacred or inviolable.
Racism Racism is the belief in the superiority of one race over another, which often results in discrimination and prejudice towards people based on their race or ethnicity.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: oddnutz
Lauren Southern was refused entry into the UK for Blasphemy.
I have a British birth certificate, might be time to renounce it.
No she wasn't.
originally posted by: Tempter
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: oddnutz
Lauren Southern was refused entry into the UK for Blasphemy.
I have a British birth certificate, might be time to renounce it.
No she wasn't.
www.thegatewaypundit.com...
Jailed Because She’s Conservative=> Canadian YouTuber and Activist Lauren Southern Denied Entry, Detained in the UK
originally posted by: oddnutz
a reply to: ScepticScot
Like i said, i consider insulting Islam as blasphemy not racism and it was for distributing anti muslim material so not racism.
originally posted by: oddnutz
a reply to: ScepticScot
so British law literally changes the meaning of the word blasphemy?
they can call it what they want but that does not change that what she did was blasphemous not racist.
2+2=5