It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: anzha
a reply to: RadioRobert
1. Because the Navy actually needs a tanker and it needs to be relatively cheap. I'd have gone with S-3s or perhaps QS-3s, but that's just me.
2. Doing your scenario would threaten their next manned fighter, both funding and otherwise. The FA-XX might be going slower than the F-X/PCA/NGAD/whatever-its-called-this-week, but once the hump of getting the Ford first-in-class issues are done, I bet we see the FA-XX accelerate.
3. The Navy isn't the US Army, after all. If it were, the program would have been cancelled and replaced and cancelled and replaced and cancelled and replaced and...never changing anything except when Congress orders it to directly.