-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Shatter my establishment then. I'll shoot you a star. :-)

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

"Hope porn" would be fine, except that's basically what Barrack's administration spouted, so it makes me feel all dirty...that's just me tho..

a reply to: dashen

I don't even care about stars, critically important issues getting ignored, while we all get played and march to the MSM's drummer, now that I care about.

And I bring the science, asking questions relating it to this q thing, and the issue science and the questions being skipped past ignored.

Lemme guess, I have to read 950 pages and answer the questions myself???

a reply to: Wookiep

Well, due to certain phrases and events being told by Q in advance on several occasions before said events and/or speeches were televised etc...we know Q has info at the very top, and we know he/she is close to the POTUS. We also know that Q often refers to him/herself as "we", so it's not just one person.

It's a team at the top trying to expose truth. But the truth can be hard to swallow. Q encourages research by leaving breadcrumbs, so that when we find it, it doesn't cause such a potentially devistating shock or denial which happens, clearly when people are given all the dirt all at once. The motive? Maybe to just get the truth out one bit at a time while allowing us to find the readily available info that already exists.

Yes I know Q is a team of people. I know Q sometimes shares truth and I know Q sometimes share misinfromation.

Maybe the motive is just to get the truth out. Maybe it is not. But these questions need to be asked.

a reply to: Wookiep

I clicked the dot.

At the end we all walk alone.

If you find yourself in darkness paint with every color you can imagine.

Think of how many lights you will create.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
From my point of view we are in intelligence gathering mode and it's more effective to debate relevance, accuracy and truth once we have gathered a minimum data set.

I will star posts to acknowledge the new data and indicate that i'll be looking for additional supporting or contrary data.

The big issue currently is that we have so many leads to be gathering datasets on, this means we don't have bandwidth to engage in "non-core", helicopter-view, or deep analysis debates at this point. More stars on these posts detract energy from the fact gathering.

a reply to: Wookiep

Mankind was not born to be afraid.

We are born for freedom.

a reply to: ketsuko

'Keep Your Nose To The Grindstone'

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I don't even know what that means. But it sounds like people need to get back to writing articles. Starting with q. As it sounds like he's created a big circle jerk from what you're saying.

But what do I know?

Not anything apparently I haven't read the entire thread or every q tweet.

a reply to: Outlier13

So it's just passive happenstance....

Likely story.
No targeted advertisements.
Not data collection on users behaviors.
No profiling of any kind.
No data mining.
No persuasion or manipulation via propaganda of any kind.
The intelligence agencies played no part whatsoever in the development of the internet and how it's used.

Got it. Putting it in my back pocket for future reference.

a reply to: purplemer

Indeed! But as for misinformation, citation required. Please elaborate.

originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: Wookiep

I clicked the dot.

At the end we all walk alone.

If you find yourself in darkness paint with every color you can imagine.

Think of how many lights you will create.

Glad you clicked the dot.

And I agree, freedom is what it's all about! Many are weary from the last admin.

I voted for Paul in 2012. Registered libertarian. Not the lefty/marxist kind the left produced out of thin air one day.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Lemme guess, I have to read 950 pages and answer the questions myself???

Actually, you already know a lot of what Q is posting. I've read a good number of your threads and posts so I feel pretty confident in saying this.

What Q seems to be doing is pointing attention in certain directions and some are asking if we're being lead astray. I don't see that as in invalid question at all.

For my part, I like riffing off of what others post and will occasionally tackle a crumb directly. I look for supporting or excluding data and post what seems relevant to me.

Q seems pretty definitively directed at clearing out black hats and rooting out the vermin from their nests.

You've shined plenty of lights down in the darkness already and do know that there is a whole menagerie scurrying about in the shadows. Along comes Q and starts shining lights in many of the very same places you've (and many of us) already dug around a bit in only we are being given a bit more to work with than, "look there;" we're getting a bit of a description to go along with the illumination.

Or that's how I see it. ymmv

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

If you actually read my words starting on page 63, the question I begged was if q or trump have discussed the bombshell yet totally ignored, scientifically proven Mass Shooter Contagion Effect (MSM+politician driven Emotional Contagion Effect + Copycat Effect).

The implicit question that comes with it is what has q or trump been talking about on the Miami etc school shootings otherwise.

All I seem trump do was play MSM style tunes, if not downright march to their drummer.

So I asked if q was the exception???

Since so many here in has allowed all this q stuff all along this should be easy to answer explain for those of us that could not.

All the while, on school shootings, a trump issue, when the MSM is a leading cause of essentially ALL shootings, what is more relevant to discuss no matter which shooting event is the topic of the day? What issue in general is MORE important than such a thing, the MSm + politicians causing the shootings) for that matter????

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I don't even know what that means. But it sounds like people need to get back to writing articles. Starting with q. As it sounds like he's created a big circle jerk from what you're saying.

But what do I know?

I haven't read the entire thread or every q tweet.

Here's a high-level overview of Q. - steemit.com...@heartdaughter/the-qanon-phenomenon-confirms-the-storm-has-arrived

This 2013 artilce says a bit about the Ultra Secret "Q Group": www.thedailybeast.com...

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

OK, so that's just it ... does the MSM cause it or does something else?

We've debated the actual cause, but I think we all agree that there is a very well-scripted response that every newsroom and media source in the US has that they pretty much run like clockwork for several different kinds of events. They receive their marching orders and follow them all right.

It's a mistake to think of them as an independent, free press, and this goes on on both sides. Dancers walking off the familiar steps.

But it's not the press calling the shots on this. It's very much bigger than that and far more coordinated.

a reply to: eisegesis

Are you referring to alchemy or something?

Copter crash in East River, NY.

a reply to: fiverx313

We answered various questions multiple times throughout all 4 threads until they became redundant. Either the answers get ignored or people use them to derail the thread further. I'm following this very closely for over a year now and you don't see me begging for a TLDR in other threads that are years old. Sorry but this topic includes a lot of reading and i mean an enormous amount of sifting through articles,documents,statements,witness accounts and what not. I did and i expect the same from others as well.

Dashen was even so kind to create an Index and still people keep complaining. I assume most people here are old enough to find the information themselves. Read the threads and come back to us when we are on the same level to discuss it further or just don't. Some people barge in and spread BS lies because they have no idea what they are talking about. Even if i explain something in great detail they still ignore the information altogether or switch to another irrelevant topic. Why are we supposed to waste time with people who don't even want to know what is going on?

Q is putting the breadcrumbs out for a very good reason. People in general tend to trust information more they themselves researched and discovered. I would have never looked up Barrick Gold if it wasn't for the Gold breadcrumb and i'm certainly not the only one in here. I don't regret a single post i made. I consider everyone in here(including all the lurkers Hi btw) as part of my extended family. Like it or not but this right here is what ATS is all about. We are connecting dots together and there are no real rules well except of keeping it polite and civil of course. Pick any Q drop and look them up yourself. You will be surprised what you uncover if you don't constantly rely on others to do the work for you.

[V]