It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001
You don't have any evidence for your statement.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Dutchowl
I thought that it was almost immediately determined that the Russians had nothing to do with it based on there being no evidence and they had moved on. Now I heard on Hannity that they're still trying to say the Russians did it, again with zero evidence and proof to the contrary.
We now have a lengthy series of testimonials that the Russians approached the Trump campaign with hacked emails and other "incriminating documents" prior to the release of the emails on WikiLeaks. This is coupled with the statements by intelligence agencies, both American and allied, that the hacks were done by Russia. No reasonable person can doubt that this is the case. What "evidence to the contrary" has Hannity found? (He had better be careful, his finances may be investigated soon.)
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Right, according to Facebook these Russian groups spent 50K and Hillay spent 1.2 Billionon advertising. If the Russians were so effective with so little everyone would be trying to recreate that effect.
everyone knows John Podesta ordered it with Clinton approval
They got what they asked for. Defeat and the golden award in humiliation.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Sillyolme
Well everyone of the Dem side had thought Trump couldn't win, but the conspiracy theorists won on that one.