Originally posted by nyarlathotep
Those are some pretty big "what-if's". I tend to go with what has already been proven mathematically as seen by here:
....snip.....
Therefore, we can conclude that it is not possible to travel up to or beyond the speed of light.
granted, those are big ifs. i don't believe any of them circumvents any working physics formulas. if you add something to one side of an equation,
you simply must add it to the other side as well.
i'm a huge math fan. however, i like dealing in concepts even more. the thing with math is you need to have ALL the signifigant variables.
what about that mysterious place where particles wink in and out of existance? where do they go? where do they come from? this is where einstien
breaks down, just as newton did before him. what about nonlocality? that is the instantaneous transmission of information over vast distances. i
think you know what i'm talking about. that is faster than light.
of course there is the whole wormhole possibility, too.
quantum formulas work both forwards and backwards in time, in fact, they insist on time going in both directions.
and then, there is the fabric of spacetime. we don't really know what it is, although the theory is in constant advance. all that dark matter
making up the majority of space is a newborn in our collective consciousness.
i think just putting a gazzilion horsepower motor on a spaceship and putting the petal to the metal won't work, i agree. but the linitations
described by you are asuming you are interested in galactic travel through space at 'warp' speeds. the philadelphia experiment is supposed to have
happened on a stationary ship. so it would be the enviroment that is changed, not the ship. a portal that bypasses spacetime, and therefore the
'laws' of spacetime, would have to have been created.
so, while you are free to come to that conclusion, i will keep my mind working on possibilities. science is never finished.
i'm going to do a phylodough ferya experiment, soon, to prove that thyme travel is possible.