It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Scrubdog
a reply to: FamCore
riiiighttt
Schumer the "bigot" drinking with "George Soros" and you JUST HAPPEN to have that handy.
I am positive that bigoted people offend you.
Positive.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: carewemust
Try this. From Fox and quoting Shumer:
“It is long past time that the judiciary starts looking a lot more like the America it represents,” Schumer said. “Having a diversity of views and experience on the federal bench is necessary for the equal administration of justice.”
www.foxnews.com...
So justice should be dished out on skin color instead of the LAW.
Schumer is a real piece of work.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: neo96
Pandering in the most obvious fashion.
He should give up his seat for an AA instead.
I hope Trump supporters understand the importance of ADDING Republican seats to the Senate. If Republicans can get 60 or more seats, nutjob Schumer will be totally shut-down.
originally posted by: Scrubdog
I suppose it doesn't matter at all that both Obama's 2 judges that he nominated to fill that seat (it's been open since 2011) were blocked by the 2 South Carolinian senators, Graham and Scott, right? That doesn't matter the least bit?
I'm also sure it doesn't matter that 83% of Trump's nominees to the federal judiciary have been male, 92% have been white, and the fact that South Carolina - one of the heaviest African-American states in existence could use a judiciary that "looks" like South Carolina. Again, doesn't matter in the least to y'all, I realize.
Anyway, too typical. Repubs blocked the first person Obama nominated in 2011 (Obama's first term), and Obama honored the with-holding of the blue slip, submitted another person which both blocked through 2016, and then Trump submits his.
But, hey, block 2 perfectly qualified black judges (no one disputed they were qualified, just didn't like that Obama nominated them), then Trump submits his white man and its through in a year and you guys btch. Pretty typical.
originally posted by: Outlier13
a reply to: carewemust
The left could care less if their "leaders" are racists and bigots. The left are the highest level hypocrites I've ever witnessed.
Hippies! There are no hippies on the bench. That is why it is taking so long to legalize cannabis. It started with Nixon. Nixon was a known bigot against hippies. And then it just seemed to pass from presidency to presidency as they just simply won't address it ever. Hippies are not represented by any of the 2 party system.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Scrubdog
I suppose it doesn't matter at all that both Obama's 2 judges that he nominated to fill that seat (it's been open since 2011) were blocked by the 2 South Carolinian senators, Graham and Scott, right? That doesn't matter the least bit?
I'm also sure it doesn't matter that 83% of Trump's nominees to the federal judiciary have been male, 92% have been white, and the fact that South Carolina - one of the heaviest African-American states in existence could use a judiciary that "looks" like South Carolina. Again, doesn't matter in the least to y'all, I realize.
Anyway, too typical. Repubs blocked the first person Obama nominated in 2011 (Obama's first term), and Obama honored the with-holding of the blue slip, submitted another person which both blocked through 2016, and then Trump submits his.
But, hey, block 2 perfectly qualified black judges (no one disputed they were qualified, just didn't like that Obama nominated them), then Trump submits his white man and its through in a year and you guys btch. Pretty typical.
You had your chance to bitch back then.
Clarence Thomas? Anita Hill?
Who cares what color this guy is, Oh wait!
YOU do!
I don't see any trannies on the fed bench. What about them? or Pets?
Women? I'd love to see Dr. Laura or Erin Brockovich on the SC.
Shoemacher is in trouble.
originally posted by: bulwarkz
Hippies! There are no hippies on the bench. That is why it is taking so long to legalize cannabis. It started with Nixon. Nixon was a known bigot against hippies. And then it just seemed to pass from presidency to presidency as they just simply won't address it ever. Hippies are not represented by any of the 2 party system.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Scrubdog
I suppose it doesn't matter at all that both Obama's 2 judges that he nominated to fill that seat (it's been open since 2011) were blocked by the 2 South Carolinian senators, Graham and Scott, right? That doesn't matter the least bit?
I'm also sure it doesn't matter that 83% of Trump's nominees to the federal judiciary have been male, 92% have been white, and the fact that South Carolina - one of the heaviest African-American states in existence could use a judiciary that "looks" like South Carolina. Again, doesn't matter in the least to y'all, I realize.
Anyway, too typical. Repubs blocked the first person Obama nominated in 2011 (Obama's first term), and Obama honored the with-holding of the blue slip, submitted another person which both blocked through 2016, and then Trump submits his.
But, hey, block 2 perfectly qualified black judges (no one disputed they were qualified, just didn't like that Obama nominated them), then Trump submits his white man and its through in a year and you guys btch. Pretty typical.
You had your chance to bitch back then.
Clarence Thomas? Anita Hill?
Who cares what color this guy is, Oh wait!
YOU do!
I don't see any trannies on the fed bench. What about them? or Pets?
Women? I'd love to see Dr. Laura or Erin Brockovich on the SC.
Shoemacher is in trouble.
There was that "rent-is-too-damn-high" party that guy tried to start and run for president though. I think he was a hippy. If not I am pretty sure he was high.