Debunking Flat Earth and the Hollow Earth

You all fools, stop looking for excuses, go buy and learn how to fly or pay for a trip with a Mig and go check it out for yourself, dummies. And watch it all then come with your lame excuses like the fish eye idiotic stuff

Explain how the fish eye only works once they are out there, probably is so smart that it knows when to switch to the round earth and when not to.

Go see for yourself, is not expensive, don't take a camera look through the window

Stomp fools

originally posted by: turbonium1
It doesn't explain the case I'm referring to, only pretends to be, like usual.

The problem is when the sun and moon are both seen directly above Earth, at the very same time, in daylight, while the moon is half blocked out....

What can block the moon, here?

Here you have a better one, look at it all, explain, go buy yourself a trip, is not too expensive, then tell us

Fish-eye lenses make the world look round, this makes it a most popular tool of deception.


A very stupid tactic, obviously.

originally posted by: turbonium1
Fish-eye lenses make the world look round, this makes it a most popular tool of deception.


A very stupid tactic, obviously.

Fish eye lens have a mind of their own, they know when to go full "fish eye" and when not to

originally posted by: WarriorMH

Click on the link above (that you posted)and look straight away at the image at the beginning - notice how the earth appears to be concave behind the plane. Look at the lines on the ground along side the plane (left bottom corner) also - see how the 'straight lines' are not straight - they curve.

originally posted by: WarriorMH

originally posted by: turbonium1
Fish-eye lenses make the world look round, this makes it a most popular tool of deception.


A very stupid tactic, obviously.

Fish eye lens have a mind of their own, they know when to go full "fish eye" and when not to

And back at NASA, where space is a various assortment of oil paintings, image creation, and special effect footage, it's time
we landed on Mars.... soon after they've hired more artists

Earth's not proven to be a sphere with a bunch of ridiculous, inconsistent, oil paintings.

North America must have taken Viagra, growing twice the size - in only a couple of years, too!!


Sad

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: WarriorMH

Click on the link above (that you posted)and look straight away at the image at the beginning - notice how the earth appears to be concave behind the plane. Look at the lines on the ground along side the plane (left bottom corner) also - see how the 'straight lines' are not straight - they curve.

And even the runway looks to be very 'curved', which proves that all runways are actually 'curved', right?


I thought they were flat, until a video showed me otherwise!

'NASA' - Needs All Space Artists


Express what space means to you, on a canvas.


Remember, there's never enough brilliant colors, when it comes to painting 'space'!

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: turbonium1

Which means we would never see a half moon... or anything but a full moon in your theory

Im not even going to respond to your reply to me

Its just not worth it

The moon has nothing to block half of it out, although it is being blocked halfway.

There has to be another object blocking the moon, near enough to block the moon, and in the same cycle of the moon, while nobody dares speak of it, at least, in public.

What they say about the half-blocked moon is total nonsense. It cannot be replicated, with any actual models, or with even one, single, valid simulation.

Because there is nothing they can make to block out half the moon, with simulations, or with models, so obviously it's never done. Not possible to realistically support it.

(Hysterical laughter)
Oh, please keep trolling us all with lunacy like this. Gawd, I haven't laughed so hard in ages.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Yeah...

the last page and a half is a must read!!

shameless bump

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: WarriorMH

Click on the link above (that you posted)and look straight away at the image at the beginning - notice how the earth appears to be concave behind the plane. Look at the lines on the ground along side the plane (left bottom corner) also - see how the 'straight lines' are not straight - they curve.

Buy a trip so you can see it with your own eyes

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: turbonium1

Which means we would never see a half moon... or anything but a full moon in your theory

Im not even going to respond to your reply to me

Its just not worth it

The moon has nothing to block half of it out, although it is being blocked halfway.

There has to be another object blocking the moon, near enough to block the moon, and in the same cycle of the moon, while nobody dares speak of it, at least, in public.

What they say about the half-blocked moon is total nonsense. It cannot be replicated, with any actual models, or with even one, single, valid simulation.

Because there is nothing they can make to block out half the moon, with simulations, or with models, so obviously it's never done. Not possible to realistically support it.

(Hysterical laughter)
Oh, please keep trolling us all with lunacy like this. Gawd, I haven't laughed so hard in ages.

So when you weren't going to bother replying to my post, you lied, or suddenly changed your mind, then?

And the only reason you decided to 'bother' replying was to act like a grubby, childish troll?


To laugh at another view, is one thing. To laugh at someone for HAVING that one, specific view, on one, specific issue, is far worse. When it's done without even addressing the points I brought up, you should leave this thread, to others who want to discuss/debate the issue. You obviously don't want to stick to the issue. I'm tired of dealing with all your crap, and I'm sure others are, too.

It doesn't help your case... just the opposite.

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: WarriorMH

Click on the link above (that you posted)and look straight away at the image at the beginning - notice how the earth appears to be concave behind the plane. Look at the lines on the ground along side the plane (left bottom corner) also - see how the 'straight lines' are not straight - they curve.

And even the runway looks to be very 'curved', which proves that all runways are actually 'curved', right?

I thought they were flat, until a video showed me otherwise!

It is a fish eye lense lmfao

Go take the trip and see for yourself, i don't get it, it is cheap!

If you take the trip and see a round earth and still don't believe it then you are lost forever if you can't trust your own eyes

originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Yeah...

the last page and a half is a must read!!

shameless bump

See my last post, it applies to you, same way.

You can encourage another troll, or you can have a bunch of trolls, polluting the entire thread with endless posts, of crap..
I've seen it happen before, so when I see another thread going in the same, ugly, direction, it's not a good thing.


For you, it is your only goal. At least, it sure seems to be..

It is not good for anyone who wants to discuss issues, like this. And not good for the overall integrity of the forum, itself.

a reply to: turbonium1

Sorry brother

We actually aren't discussing issues of every day individuals

These are "your" issues... specifically

Which in actuality are settled.... and i've even given you a demonstration of said issues which you can test for yourself

So who is the troll here?

originally posted by: WarriorMH

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: WarriorMH

Click on the link above (that you posted)and look straight away at the image at the beginning - notice how the earth appears to be concave behind the plane. Look at the lines on the ground along side the plane (left bottom corner) also - see how the 'straight lines' are not straight - they curve.

And even the runway looks to be very 'curved', which proves that all runways are actually 'curved', right?

I thought they were flat, until a video showed me otherwise!

It is a fish eye lense lmfao

Go take the trip and see for yourself, i don't get it, it is cheap!

If you take the trip and see a round earth and still don't believe it then you are lost forever if you can't trust your own eyes

When you are on a plane, and it stays in level flight, over the entire flight, and at the very same altitude throughout, which is also confirmed with instruments on the plane, do you trust what the instruments measure? I do, so should you.

Pilots trust their eyes, when they see the horizon, which they see as a flat, horizontal line, straight across Earth. No matter how high in altitude, the horizon goes straight across Earth. If the horizon can't be seen, there is also a 'simulated' horizon, shown on their instrument panel. It also has a straight horizontal line, to simulate the actual horizon.

So when all the instruments measure a level flight, at the same altitude, along X axis, and uses a flat, level line, straight across Earth, as the Y axis, what does that tell you about the 'curvature'.

It's rather odd that you can see a 'curve' on the Earth's horizon, when pilots see the horizon as a straight line. That's why all planes ALSO use a straight line to simulate the actual horizon.


I trust the instruments, and I trust my eyes, which all show, in every way, that the Earth is, indeed, flat.


I'll once again ask for you, or anyone else, to try and account for 1800 feet of curvature, over a 6 hour flight, because it's still 'missing'!!!

1800 feet doesn't vanish away with 'little adjustments, made along the way', obviously. And it would show a descent of 1800 feet over the 6 hour flight, which it doesn't. And it stays at the same altitude, throughout.

This, in a nutshell, is your inexplicable dilemma

Have fun trying to resolve it...

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: WarriorMH

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: WarriorMH

Click on the link above (that you posted)and look straight away at the image at the beginning - notice how the earth appears to be concave behind the plane. Look at the lines on the ground along side the plane (left bottom corner) also - see how the 'straight lines' are not straight - they curve.

And even the runway looks to be very 'curved', which proves that all runways are actually 'curved', right?

I thought they were flat, until a video showed me otherwise!

It is a fish eye lense lmfao

Go take the trip and see for yourself, i don't get it, it is cheap!

If you take the trip and see a round earth and still don't believe it then you are lost forever if you can't trust your own eyes

When you are on a plane, and it stays in level flight, over the entire flight, and at the very same altitude throughout, which is also confirmed with instruments on the plane, do you trust what the instruments measure? I do, so should you.

Pilots trust their eyes, when they see the horizon, which they see as a flat, horizontal line, straight across Earth. No matter how high in altitude, the horizon goes straight across Earth. If the horizon can't be seen, there is also a 'simulated' horizon, shown on their instrument panel. It also has a straight horizontal line, to simulate the actual horizon.

So when all the instruments measure a level flight, at the same altitude, along X axis, and uses a flat, level line, straight across Earth, as the Y axis, what does that tell you about the 'curvature'.

It's rather odd that you can see a 'curve' on the Earth's horizon, when pilots see the horizon as a straight line. That's why all planes ALSO use a straight line to simulate the actual horizon.


I trust the instruments, and I trust my eyes, which all show, in every way, that the Earth is, indeed, flat.


I'll once again ask for you, or anyone else, to try and account for 1800 feet of curvature, over a 6 hour flight, because it's still 'missing'!!!

1800 feet doesn't vanish away with 'little adjustments, made along the way', obviously. And it would show a descent of 1800 feet over the 6 hour flight, which it doesn't. And it stays at the same altitude, throughout.

This, in a nutshell, is your inexplicable dilemma

Have fun trying to resolve it...

Go pay and take the flight, take it up to 50+ thousand feet, pay the cash and see it for yourself, why is that so hard?

keep going up until you see it then you go down and see it go flat, your eyes will tell you

originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: turbonium1

Sorry brother

We actually aren't discussing issues of every day individuals

These are "your" issues... specifically

Which in actuality are settled.... and i've even given you a demonstration of said issues which you can test for yourself

So who is the troll here?

Those who don't, or rarely do, care to discuss the ACTUAL ISSUES of this thread...because they prefer to go on and on, mocking, and insulting, anyone, who 'dares' to claim anything else .... are absolute trolls.


And if you think the issue is settled, why are you still here?

Now, could you please tell me exactly when the 1800 feet of 'missing curvature' were 'settled'? I don't recall anyone accounting for it, do you?