It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Jonathan M. Winer, the Obama State Department official who acknowledged regularly interfacing with the author of the controversial, largely discredited 35-page anti-Trump dossier, served as senior vice president of a firm that did lobbying work for Tenex, the U.S. subsidiary of Rosatom, the Russian state corporation headquartered in Moscow.
Says Hillary Clinton’s State Department "approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation."
The bottom line: While the connections between the Clinton Foundation and the Russian deal may appear fishy, there’s simply no proof of any quid pro quo.
originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: Krazysh0t
This ENTIRE line of inquiry has been proven to be a nothingburger
Do you mean the whole Trump Russia collusion and that pesky impeachment thing?
Hows that going anyway?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
So you DO know that bias doesn't prevent a court from using evidence to obtain a warrant right? You don't need to prove that someone is guilty to get a warrant; you just have to establish the possibility of guilt. Something that is allowed with biased evidence. This ENTIRE line of inquiry has been proven to be a nothingburger and Nunes shot himself in the foot with the memo fiasco.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
So you DO know that bias doesn't prevent a court from using evidence to obtain a warrant right? You don't need to prove that someone is guilty to get a warrant; you just have to establish the possibility of guilt. Something that is allowed with biased evidence. This ENTIRE line of inquiry has been proven to be a nothingburger and Nunes shot himself in the foot with the memo fiasco.
You are telling me that you can submit known lies on a FISA application and still get a warrant?
That is mind blowing if true, more mind blowing if its accepted.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: kurthall
Nothing in that dossier is real.
A hit piece created by Clinton.
Political hit job.