It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Someone needs to show her various types of body armor and helmets (ck the police dept), She sounds like an excellent witness not rattled at all. He fired 3 rounds and the glass didn't break! He must have been firing blanks. Interesting she said she had never seen a rifle like that before. I too am worried about an ever desperate deep state.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
Hanging on her calling armor metal is pretty dense.
What is the first thing you think of with armor?
That it's covered in fabric and kevlar?
It's a pretty obvious mistake with her description, she's not a cop or soldier.
She is associating armor with metal imo.
originally posted by: MisterMcKill
Just as we saw with the massacre in Las Vegas, a number of questions and inconsistencies have arisen following the Parkland High School shooting.
As Intellhub's Shepard Ambellas reports, Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School teacher Stacy Lippel was grazed by a hot bullet which left the chamber of the shooter’s gun as she closed the door to her classroom after letting a number of students file into what would presumably be safety. However, nothing could have prepared the teacher for what she was to witness next.
“I suddenly saw the shooter about twenty feet in front of me standing at the end of the hallway actively shooting down the hallway, just a barrage of bullets, and I’m staring at him thinking why are the police here, this is strange because he's in full metal garb, face mask, bulletproof armor, shooting this rifle that I've never seen before."
Questions Emerge Over Florida Shooter's "Full Metal Garb"
I really do not like the sound of this. As one more mass shooting narrative falls apart, I just get a sinking feeling that we are all being manipulated in the worst possible way. I will leave you all to make of this what you will. As for me, I think that something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
The article goes further into the alleged timeline, and... well, it just doesn't add up.
... prosecutors have already offered Cruz a deal to spare his life in exchange for his plead of guilt. However, if school cameras, video footage, and other hard evidence reveals that Cruz was, in fact, the shooter, why would there be a need for Cruz to plead guilty? Wouldn’t the case be cut and dry?