The Case for Roswell: Part I.

Kevin Randle and Don Schimtt work already panned by critics as sloppily researched books..

Kevin Randle denounce Don Schimtt work when the latter admit he lies on his personal credentials and then also admit lies when researching Roswel materials.

Basically there are a lot of bad guys on every UFO case :
1. UFO believer who write books to support their belief , without even researching the contradictory elements/facts
2. Debunkers who write books to support their belief, without even researching the contradictory elements/facts
3. Con Men / Huckster who say anything for the money

The good guys are : UFO Researcher who write balanced research and know how to view each case factually , example : Jacques Vallee, Allen Hynek, Aime Michel

a reply to: milomilo

valee and hynek were of course, also part of the official coverup efforts, so there is that....

originally posted by: Kidfinger
If this were a murder trial, and all this evidence was presented, even though its mostly circumstantial and eywitness accounts, the defendant would be found guilty.

But this isn't a court of law, and besides, there's no corpus delecti.

Personally I think the video interviews of Major Jesse Marcel Sr. hold the most truth to this whole story. He was one of the first witnesses to the crash site and he only came forward with his story after the left the army and at the end of his life.

originally posted by: Intrepidmind
Personally I think the video interviews of Major Jesse Marcel Sr. hold the most truth to this whole story. He was one of the first witnesses to the crash site and he only came forward with his story after the left the army and at the end of his life.

Some misinformation here that could only spread to others that read this. Jesse Marcel requested and received release from active duty in 1950 to provide needed assistance to his mother. He was officially released in 1958. 28 years later in 1978, Stanton Friedman caught wind of the Roswell tale from someone during one of his UFO lectures. He searched and found Marcel and interviewed him. Marcel did not come forward on his own. It was brought to the public by a UFO lecturer. He also didn't die until 1986. So this wasn't a situation where Marcel waited until he left the Air Force and near the end of his life to bring this out. Which implies a great secret that he was dying to tell but had to wait until the right time. He had 28 years to tell his story, but did not. It took someone steeped in the UFO/alien phenomenon to sell it.

What good is military testimony? Absolutely worthless. Worth even less than a CTers.

The military doesn't tell you anything. They dont care if you cant tell what they've told you to look at.

How to get the point acrossed.. Hmmm.. Well if radio says to check something out and see if you can get eyes on it, it doesn't mean they don't know what it is. It means they wanna see if an uninformed party can locate it, how it appears to them, etc.

No one in the military has a clue what they are doing. Its a need to know system.

That's why the Roswell case remains so unique though. They didn't have the system, they didn't have much previous experience in this kind of thing, so it was BEFORE they really developed the response. (assuming you believe we actually retrieved something otherworldly).