It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Times They are A Changing

page: 4
36
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




I never said anything of the sort.


Yep ya did.

Many a time with that common sense gun bull snip.

Disparaging your next door neighbors with that gun culture bull snip as well.

Gun control IS legalized discrimination.

One group gets special treatment another group gets told no.




posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

It's not about banning fire arms, I don't want to give up mine, the elk will miss me.

But no one needs the soldier toy they like to play with.

Shotgun for home defense, limited internal mag long rifle for sport & hunting, no more hand cannons if you're fearful to go to the grocery store unarmed put some mace or a tazer in your purse.

K~



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Maybe if you were a little more of an extrovert you could get out and meet some gun owners irl.

You glossed over the fact that I personally know hundreds of gun owners that create most of the jobs in the state with some lame "cool story bro bs"

You result to smack talking, because your argument is garbage.

Your response to the dicipline issue we are seeing proves your argument is a joke.

It's fun arguing with emotional people for a bit, but they will suck you down into their unhappy reality if you let them.

I've learned early in life to associate myself with positive people, doing good things, that want to watch me do good things.

Therefore, this is my last rebuttal to your whiny post, I have met cooler people on here that don't want to just manipulate people with toxic bs and bring them down to their level.

Carry on, but you can send me a thanks in the future when your life improves, assuming this concept ever sinks in.
You can't "negative" your way out of a bad attitude.

I wish you the best, I truly hate seeing people suffer like you appear to be, it's a really bad place to be when your stuck in a negative feedback loop.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96



Yep ya did. Many a time with that common sense gun bull snip.


I never said anything about "common sense gun" anything.

You are making things up again.



Disparaging your next door neighbors with that gun culture bull snip as well.


My neighbor is a firearm owner, but he is not a nut.



Gun control IS legalized discrimination.

One group gets special treatment another group gets told no.


Ok. Were did I advocate for gun control?

Can yo at least get your # together and make a decent argument?

Lying is not a decent argument.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: introvert

It's not about banning fire arms, I don't want to give up mine, the elk will miss me.

But no one needs the soldier toy they like to play with.

Shotgun for home defense, limited internal mag long rifle for sport & hunting, no more hand cannons if you're fearful to go to the grocery store unarmed put some mace or a tazer in your purse.

K~



Using these children to further your anti-gun agenda is despicable just saying. Btw still waiting for the list of NRA members committing school shootings.
edit on 24-2-2018 by Perfectenemy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:40 PM
link   
a reply to: aethertek



It's not about banning fire arms, I don't want to give up mine, the elk will miss me.


For some/many, it is about banning firearms and that bothers me.



But no one needs the soldier toy they like to play with.


That is an aspect that needs to be discussed.



Shotgun for home defense, limited internal mag long rifle for sport & hunting, no more hand cannons if you're fearful to go to the grocery store unarmed put some mace or a tazer in your purse.


I don't think it will matter. Restrictions only lead to innovation.

Where there is a will there is a way.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: introvert

It's not about banning fire arms, I don't want to give up mine, the elk will miss me.

But no one needs the soldier toy they like to play with.

Shotgun for home defense, limited internal mag long rifle for sport & hunting, no more hand cannons if you're fearful to go to the grocery store unarmed put some mace or a tazer in your purse.

K~



If you think an ar is a soldier toy, you have never been around guns.
They are liked by people who like the Army and the Police. The law, the good guys.
They are the most popular gun in the US.
You can put a bunch of accessories on them.
A 223 is a weak round that deflects off a tree.
As far as power goes the .223 is a complete joke.
Its a high velocity .22 round
Try a 300 win mag, or Barrett .50 cal.
It will shoot through an engine block and cut a body in half.

This ar talk is about removing the most popular gun in the US.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Mandroid7



Maybe if you were a little more of an extrovert you could get out and meet some gun owners irl.




Now that is a garbage argument.



You glossed over the fact that I personally know hundreds of gun owners that create most of the jobs in the state with some lame "cool story bro bs"


How does them being job creators have anything to do with an individual right?



You result to smack talking, because your argument is garbage.


See above.



Your response to the dicipline issue we are seeing proves your argument is a joke.


No. It proves that you cannot seem to make a decent argument yourself. Discipline has nothing to do with this.



It's fun arguing with emotional people for a bit, but they will suck you down into their unhappy reality if you let them.


OK. How is that relevant?



I've learned early in life to associate myself with positive people, doing good things, that want to watch me do good things.


I don't care.



Therefore, this is my last rebuttal to your whiny post, I have met cooler people on here that don't want to just manipulate people with toxic bs and bring them down to their level.


Oh no! I'm not one of the "cool" kids you want to hang out with?

Darn. My life is over...



Carry on, but you can send me a thanks in the future when your life improves, assuming this concept ever sinks in. You can't "negative" your way out of a bad attitude.


My life is great. Not sure why you have to make things up, like the other member. Perhaps you must resort to assuming and projections since you cannot seem to come up with a better response?

Again, see above comment about garbage arguments.



I wish you the best, I truly hate seeing people suffer like you appear to be, it's a really bad place to be when your stuck in a negative feedback loop.


I wish you the best as well, and I hope one of your million dollar job-creating pheasant hunters can take a little bit of their time to show you how to properly and logically converse.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: CB328

Well then, I'll just have to send 'em a bit more money, when next I renew my membership.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mandroid7

originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: introvert

It's not about banning fire arms, I don't want to give up mine, the elk will miss me.

But no one needs the soldier toy they like to play with.

Shotgun for home defense, limited internal mag long rifle for sport & hunting, no more hand cannons if you're fearful to go to the grocery store unarmed put some mace or a tazer in your purse.

K~



If you think an ar is a soldier toy, you have never been around guns.
They are liked by people who like the Army and the Police. The law, the good guys.
They are the most popular gun in the US.
You can put a bunch of accessories on them.
A 223 is a weak round that deflects off a tree.
As far as power goes the .223 is a complete joke.
Its a high velocity .22 round
Try a 300 win mag, or Barrett .50 cal.
It will shoot through an engine block and cut a body in half.

This ar talk is about removing the most popular gun in the US.








Your usual pathetically ignorant response.

You didn't answer this in the other thread want to try again.




Describe to me the effective or functional difference, besides the cyclic rate, of a civilian model AR-15 & a military issued "M-16".


K~



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 02:58 PM
link   


if your going to label millions of people nuts because they own a gun


No, I am talking about people that are against any regulating of guns no matter how necessary, and for the belief that guns are the most important thing in life and never a problem. These delusions are seriously hurting our country.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: aethertek

Context is everything.

Lets quote what he was responding to.




There is no difference, you guys just want your weapons of war so you can fufill your Rambo fantasies.


'No' difference!!!!!






It's not about banning fire arms, I don't want to give up mine, the elk will miss me.


As opposed to elk fantasies?



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: aethertek

Still waiting for my answer.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Trump Weighs ‘Red Flag’ Orders to Take Guns Away Quickly
www.bloomberg.com...

Like I said something seems different this time.

K~



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Can't you all just do pistols at dawn to decide?.
Guns guns guns I miss the end of the world threads.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 03:05 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Describe to me the effective or functional difference, besides the cyclic rate, of a civilian model AR-15 & a military issued "M-16".

K~



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 03:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: neo96

Describe to me the effective or functional difference, besides the cyclic rate, of a civilian model AR-15 & a military issued "M-16".

K~


Basic primary function.

Aim and pull the trigger.

After that apples to oranges.

Different design tolerances.

A semi automatic rifle is not designed to function at a high rate of fire.

The M variant IS designed to function at high rate,high heat tolerances, and wear.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 03:13 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

All BS.

The only difference between a civilian AR -15 & a military issue M-16 is the cyclic rate which as you people have been so kind to point out can be increased to fire faster than a standard issue M-16 which doesn't have full auto either but is limited to 3rnd bursts when not firing in semi-auto mode.

All this was pointed out in this thread,,,
www.abovetopsecret.com...
& yet here you are posting all the same lies I exposed there.

Really pathetic.

K~



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 03:14 PM
link   
a reply to: aethertek

It is sure is bs.

Anyone trying to make an issue out of rate of fire is trolling for lulz.

Aimed fire is the name of the game.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Then,,




Describe to me the effective or functional difference, besides the cyclic rate, of a civilian model AR-15 & a military issued "M-16".


You can't because there is no difference, they are the same weapon designed to do the same thing, kill enemy solders.

K~



new topics

top topics



 
36
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join