It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I’m going to take a detour for a moment because understanding 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Section 230) is what this all hinges on. Here is the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s straightforward explanation: ‘ Section 230 says that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider” (47 U.S.C. § 230). In other words, online intermediaries that host or republish speech are protected against a range of laws that might otherwise be used to hold them legally responsible for what others say and do. The protected intermediaries include not only regular Internet Service Providers (ISPs), but also a range of “interactive computer service providers,” including basically any online service that publishes third-party content. Though there are important exceptions for certain criminal and intellectual property-based claims, CDA 230 creates a broad protection that has allowed innovation and free speech online to flourish. ‘ Think of it like a billboard at a local college. The college puts a billboard up for students to make community announcements. The college never uses it. Then Adam writes something defamatory and false about Betsy. Betsy is upset and sues Adam and the college. A court would allow the lawsuit to proceed against Adam, but not the college because they just provided the platform and had nothing to do with the comments.
originally posted by: aethertek
My goodness listen to all the "shadow conspiracy they're taking my rights" crap.
Amazing to see so many defend the drunk at the end of the bar getting kicked out because he's too loud & obnoxious & the other patrons have begun to complain.
Regardless all you're "waaa, censorship" nonsense this is merely a case of being bounced out the bar because you can't keep from acting like a total idiot.
K~
Furthermore, how does changing a post differentiate from deleting one
You mean to tell me every video on inforwars youtube channel violated the ToS?
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: UKTruth
The bar near my house has a sign that says "we reserve the right to refuse service for ANY reason."
And that's the way it should be.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: UKTruth
That's simple, visit us at Bitchute. The smart people left google, fakebook and ytube last year or so. You folks are late to the party and praise the wrong gods.
Kudos for your other reply btw! Always a pleasure to disagree with people, who at least try to understand where I'm coming from.
Censorship is a weapon of cowards and tyrants.
originally posted by: Deplorable
InfoWars Link
Yeah, it looks like the fake news conglomerates are now circling the wagons. Hold on - it gets better.
The internet giant pulled down the following videos on the Parkland, Florida school shooting, and according to CNN YouTube will ban The Alex Jones Channel outright if two more videos receive strikes.
CNN Promotes Censorship of Conspiracy Theory Site
CNN is dying to watch Alex Jones' channel get yanked from YouTube.
My take: If InfoWars wasn't doing some real hurt to CNN's credibility, why would they seem to be so interested in promoting their unfair takedown. Looks like everything people have been saying about the Hogg kid has been validated. Who is CNN gonna come for next??
(CNN)InfoWars, a far-right media organization run by Alex Jones and known for peddling unfounded conspiracy theories, is on thin ice with YouTube after it posted a video that portrayed the survivors of the Parkland school shooting as actors.
The Alex Jones Channel, Infowar's biggest YouTube account, received one strike for that video, a source with knowledge of the account told CNN. YouTube's community guidelines say if an account receives three strikes in three months, the account is terminated.
originally posted by: aethertek
My goodness listen to all the "shadow conspiracy they're taking my rights" crap.
Amazing to see so many defend the drunk at the end of the bar getting kicked out because he's too loud & obnoxious & the other patrons have begun to complain.
Regardless all you're "waaa, censorship" nonsense this is merely a case of being bounced out the bar because you can't keep from acting like a total idiot.
K~