It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

No, Australia's gun ban didn't reduce violent crime

page: 9
36
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 23 2018 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Kryties

Enough do, though... Though for the life of me, I don't understand why.

Reality TV. Thankfully most know it's not reality, at all. Though there are some about who one might safely wonder...




posted on Feb, 23 2018 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull

I'll admit I'm guilty of watching the very first season of Australian Big Brother when it came out over a decade ago, but that was probably my first and last foray into reality tv. I learnt my lesson from that lol. It did have some substance though, in comparison to what I understand of the Kardashian show which I would wager actually kills brain cells.



posted on Feb, 23 2018 @ 09:18 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

You're not even reading the articles and studies correctly you knuckle dragger



posted on Feb, 23 2018 @ 11:32 PM
link   
a reply to: ziplock9000


Hey look at that, you decided to hop around and reply to a half dozen of my posts


Good for you. At least someone is reading them



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 08:45 AM
link   
No austrailias gun ban didn't reduce violent crime.

It only changed the medium.

A person is more likely to get stabbed( 3 times MORE LIKELY) than shot(STILL).

crimestats.aic.gov.au...

Great job!



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 10:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
No austrailias gun ban didn't reduce violent crime.
It only changed the medium.
person is more likely to get stabbed( 3 times MORE LIKELY) than shot(STILL).
crimestats.aic.gov.au...
Great job!

Got stats for mass stabbings in schools?



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
No austrailias gun ban didn't reduce violent crime.

It only changed the medium.

A person is more likely to get stabbed( 3 times MORE LIKELY) than shot(STILL).

crimestats.aic.gov.au...

Great job!



Did you miss the line in your link about lowest homicide rate since 1990. ( A rate about a quarter of the US rate).



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot

A quarter of the already extremely minor rate of 4.9/100,000 ?

That's not even a blip on the radar. Check out other causes of death, and get back to me once you solve those.

Or as I said before, as soon as movie stars and politicians feel secure enough here to give up their armed security, my guns won't be going anywhere. And that is a promise.



posted on Feb, 24 2018 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: ScepticScot

A quarter of the already extremely minor rate of 4.9/100,000 ?

That's not even a blip on the radar. Check out other causes of death, and get back to me once you solve those.

Or as I said before, as soon as movie stars and politicians feel secure enough here to give up their armed security, my guns won't be going anywhere. And that is a promise.


Yes because we shouldn't worry about murder until we cure cancer. Good thinking!



posted on Feb, 28 2018 @ 07:59 PM
link   
at least there are very few mass shootings in Australia since 1996...
anyway, now is the time to alien + zombie invade them after the recent firearms surrender amnesty.



posted on Feb, 28 2018 @ 09:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo
a reply to: Edumakated

We’re actually in the process of making cars even safer (self driving). We’ve also passed many measures and regulations (seatbelts, car seats, strict DWI laws), to make cars safer.

So since you brought up cars, should we go the same way with guns? Passing regulations and safety measures to make guns (or ownership) “safer”.


No because owning a car isn’t a right, the other is. We are on ATS after all, shouldn’t we be debating if the only thing holding back the NWO, is the armed American public and once we are forced to give up our arms the police state NWO can take over. Or something?



posted on Feb, 28 2018 @ 10:18 PM
link   
It is not about "crime". Crime, is an end to a means, for these politicians. It is about, a establishing a "New World Order" Now. All the Lib, Commie, Socialist, NAZI, F U, antifi, kind, are "politely", asking you, to wear this, .. .this,...this "gold star". If you don't want to wear it? You probably have a "mental illness", and shouldn't be able to by a useful "gun".
You can not compare the U.K., Australia, Canada, or any other third world country, to the U.S.A. It's not about "them". We, (American Colonial black sheep) fought the U.K. twice, and won!..Both times! Then we came to their aid twice. I'd be the first to do it again! Just like my Fathers before me. I love my cousins up North, and across the ponds. But GDamn! Don't put your foreign BS on me.
The UK, Australia, Canada, have already fell to the "new order". Only us American "cousins" are,..are the last redoubt... Don't judge us to harshly. We'll go down hard! Very hard!



posted on Feb, 28 2018 @ 10:47 PM
link   
OP: Why is Australia even an example? I know the U.S.A. libs, love Australia, as an "example" but? .. But this is, The U.S.A.!.., and we haven't castrated all our malefactors yet. ..There's still a couple hundred thousand of us, still "free balling" and rocking America! Australian "gun crime", is no issue to us. Not even a relevant issue. They already have lost their ability to be "free"... I'm sure we'll have to unF'em again, in WW3.




top topics



 
36
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join