It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Can anyone here answer Trumps latest question(s) for him?

page: 3
38
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 09:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: luthier

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: network dude

I feel the news is incredibly biased towards trump. But I also feel he purposely gives them fodder and plays with fire. Sometimes to wag the dog sometimes just for his personal amusement.

He is like a celebrity bill Clinton.


so while you blabber about his fan club, you cheerfully ignore the fanbois on the left who propagandize their reporting and stories against the sitting president? But it's OK because Trump said mean things about them?

I don't think you are this ignorant, but I could be wrong. Look up "double standard".


You usually are (wrong) I am an equal opportunity hater.

If you notice. I call out Obama, Clinton, reno, lynch, and radical leftists on a regular basis.

Hence why I rarely get stars from the true believers.

I personally can't stand the media,

Just like you don't call out fox for bias towards trump. Right?


Um, did you see in my post where I mentioned Fox news specifically? A smart guy would understand why. Yes, I do think that Fox News leans to the right and can be full of #. I also think Alex Jones is that way. Now that I have explained myself, what do you have to say about how the media (excluding Fox News) treats Trump and the right in general? Do you feel it is in any way a direct comparison to how you described Trump fans?

(hint, that was my point, if you still require clarification, just let me know)




posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: luthier




It's really not that simple.


Yeah it is that simple.

Don't start none.

Won't be none.

The US and Russia been playing tit for tat since the end of world war 2.

Whining bout it in the 21st century and ignoring our own snip is a Mount Everest level of hypocrisy.



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 09:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
You have never met, and are unlikely to ever meet, someone who can accurately interpret or translate alternative meanings from my words. Read them and quote them as you find them, because you will never find a psychologist or a linguist who is better at working out what I am talking about, than I am myself.

Yes, that's why my post was directed to you, telling you to correct me if I am wrong. You didn't correct me, you just wrote a paragraph stating the obvious. It certainly seems like you are saying it was right to withhold the truth because of the interpretation of it from others casting a negative light on the left.

Can you clarify what you mean then? How else could that be interpreted?



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 09:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12


Can anyone here answer Trumps latest question(s) for him?


I almost pity Trump with his consuming obsession with Obama and Hillary.

www.rawstory.com...

no doubt. There is no proof whatsoever that ANYONE on the democrat side has done anything even remotely shady at this point. to even insinuate that such things have taken place is a ludicrous idea.

The left has been beyond reproach. Those damn republicans are fkn evil to the core though.



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 09:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: luthier

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: network dude

I feel the news is incredibly biased towards trump. But I also feel he purposely gives them fodder and plays with fire. Sometimes to wag the dog sometimes just for his personal amusement.

He is like a celebrity bill Clinton.


so while you blabber about his fan club, you cheerfully ignore the fanbois on the left who propagandize their reporting and stories against the sitting president? But it's OK because Trump said mean things about them?

I don't think you are this ignorant, but I could be wrong. Look up "double standard".


You usually are (wrong) I am an equal opportunity hater.

If you notice. I call out Obama, Clinton, reno, lynch, and radical leftists on a regular basis.

Hence why I rarely get stars from the true believers.

I personally can't stand the media,

Just like you don't call out fox for bias towards trump. Right?


Um, did you see in my post where I mentioned Fox news specifically? A smart guy would understand why. Yes, I do think that Fox News leans to the right and can be full of #. I also think Alex Jones is that way. Now that I have explained myself, what do you have to say about how the media (excluding Fox News) treats Trump and the right in general? Do you feel it is in any way a direct comparison to how you described Trump fans?

(hint, that was my point, if you still require clarification, just let me know)


If you were as smart as you pretend you could read clearly that I stated I don't like the media, the radical left, true believers, and that the media is incredibly biased against trump.

I know it's very hard for the partisan mind to comprehend but I also don't view it as a vacuum. That trump is more than mean but he actually is impulsive and gives ammunition to his enemies.

So let me clarify. The media is incredibly biased and is fed by a troll who sometimes impulsively says stupid things to egg on his hater trolls.

If he spent more time working on advancing realistic policy maybe he wouldn't have as big of an issue though it would still be considerable because the liberal media is biased against normal conservatism.

Hell conservatives are biased against conservatives. Look at rand Paul. He is an island for trying to be conservative. He gets heckled by his own party.



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 09:50 AM
link   
The BS narrative of Russian collusion changing to Russian meddling is as insidious as global warming changing to climate change. Sheeple eat this stuff up like candy!



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 09:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: luthier




It's really not that simple.


Yeah it is that simple.

Don't start none.

Won't be none.

The US and Russia been playing tit for tat since the end of world war 2.

Whining bout it in the 21st century and ignoring our own snip is a Mount Everest level of hypocrisy.


Maybe Washington should have lost the war and stuck to a moral ground as well huh?

Thankfully he didn't. He used subversive means to win. And here we are.

Does that mean it doesn't need to be reigned in no.

But it sure as hell isn't simple.



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 09:56 AM
link   
a reply to: luthier




Maybe Washington should have lost the war and stuck to a moral ground as well huh?


Well had twitter existed at the time.

They would have been French bots, not russian.

Paid for by the Dutch.



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Blah blah blah,

Deflect.

Your pretty naive if you think stopping meddling with Russia would stop them meddling with us.

When you are on top people want to take you down.

Thankfully you don't run the country.



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:02 AM
link   
a reply to: BelowLowAnnouncement

Well, if you get that impression, you need to get better at reading.

Its not in there.

It was right to withhold the truth, because releasing that information early, would have rendered any investigation into the origin and intent of that meddling, not to mention who might have been co-ordinating that meddling, and indeed the hacking of the DNC campaign, unable to make any headway.

This is very similar to not publishing every last detail of a crime, so that someone caught talking about it, using information which was not released publicly, can be identified simply by way of what they know, since only investigators or collaborators involved in a plot, could possibly know the information in question.

Its actually entirely common practice in investigative efforts, to withhold information from the public, in order to better flush out those responsible or involved with a thing. In this instance, this is the reasoning behind the prior governments unwillingness to be forthright.



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:12 AM
link   
Well he gave you the answer.......ask Jeff Session.

~Morpheus



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Christosterone

I personally find it ironic the Trump has more lapdog than any president I can remember.

People constantly carry his argument strait from his tweets. They fully support anything he does.

You gotta ask yourself, why does Trump have such a surprisingly high level of support despite his not so easy-to-love personality? And who is it that actually supports Trump? Why does the MSM hate him so much while the common guy has a level of respect for the president which hasn't been seen in quite some time?



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: luthier

it's interesting that you claim to hate both sides. Your posts do seem to be very specific towards one group. But whatever, you know who you are, and if you don't, you have the kind of problems I sure as hell can't help you with.

But I would like to draw your attention to why you should thank Trump. You owe him. he did all of us a solid.
Love him, hate him, loath him, he made the corruption take center stage and the world now sees it for what it is. Without Trump, this would have continued to be hidden, and the government would have continued to operate as is had.

I am super confused as to why the left seems to want the corruption to remain and seem to be against removing it.



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: BelowLowAnnouncement

Well, if you get that impression, you need to get better at reading.

Grow up man, you used to be better, I wasn't even attacking you, I was asking for clarification. I made a perfectly reasonable interpretation of your words. Maybe you need to get better at writing?



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

The funny thing is the moment I mentioned 'Russia' my internet went down so I had to retype this, no joke.

Trump was not guilty of anything except of throwing childish tantrums on social media, and at the end of covfefe



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t




He only shifted to this narrative now that he can't deny that the meddling didn't happen anymore


I keep hearing that and having to go through the many motions, shooting down every bit of innuendo placed in our conversations way.

There is no evidence of hacking, collusion, or meaningful alterations to results.

There ARE serious accusations WITH SUPPORTING EVIDENCE showing the whole thing was a hoax. A product of weaponized federal institutions under partisan leadership.

Have you been under a rock?

The dems are now saying social media ads bought after the election, FOR NOT MY PRESIDENT movements and such were what altered the election.

So ABSOLUTELY no Russian interference in the election.

If you disagree show me evidence.

I get that you do. Now show why.


edit on 2 21 2018 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: luthier

originally posted by: Christosterone

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Christosterone

I personally find it ironic the Trump has more lapdog than any president I can remember.

People constantly carry his argument strait from his tweets. They fully support anything he does.

Obama may have had his share but they at least got pissed when his rediculous promises didn't come to be.

Personally as someone who calls it all bullcrap. It's amusing to watch.

It's amusing to watch the ohh poor white people under attack because some crazy liberals said something in news crowd. Same people who say ignore the nazis and they will go away.

Fighting extremism with rational calm independent thought is gone I guess.


Ignoring nazis is the sole dominion of the left...
“Neville Chamberlain” ring any bells?
I’ll give you the one sentence he deserves:
In typical liberal fashion, he chose to avoid conflict with “talk”....

I find it rather funny u would use “ignoring nazis and they will go away” as an argument...
Because Nazis nearly took over the western world when ignored..

That’s what socialists do, by the way....they take all the power...
The National Socialist Party (NAZI) sought control over every aspect of German life...
They controlled everything from healthcare to railroads...
And when they were done with Germany, they wanted everyone to follow their rule...
They were typical socialists...despotic and controlling every one of them

-Chris


Your post was pretty much.

Blah blah blah blah blah.

Out of context bs.

Pretty sure you know I was referring to Charlottesville.


Why? The one person that died didn't die being hit by a car..
edit on 21-2-2018 by Wardaddy454 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:33 AM
link   
a reply to: tadaman
Thanks for your angry rant with no evidence.



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

You made claims. Provide your evidence. Thats how it works.

You are now in the realm of absurdity by contradicting the known facts after over a year of revelations.

Do you have reasons or feelings for doing that?


edit on 2 21 2018 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 10:39 AM
link   
Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Putin & I discussed forming an impenetrable Cyber Security unit so that election hacking, & many other negative things, will be guarded..
4:50 AM - Jul 9, 2017



new topics

top topics



 
38
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join