It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cheeser
why cant America spend a small fraction of there warefare funds (possibly as high as 400billion) and save many of these lives?.. it frustrates me... thats 14.6million kids a year.
Originally posted by cheeser
an esitmated of 40,000 starving, malnutritioned kids die every day.
why cant America spend a small fraction of there warefare funds (possibly as high as 400billion) and save many of these lives?.. it frustrates me... thats 14.6million kids a year.
Originally posted by jawapunk
I have a feeling this topic has now expired.....the UN was the final blow, this type of thing is the only thing the UN DOES do right.
Originally posted by Odd
so you think world hunger is america's fault?
you're dumb
Originally posted by mwm1331
Ahh cheeser theres the rub ah? Its not feasible for your country to do it but you think its feasible for mine to?
You must be the australian equivalent of a democrat because you have no problems spending other peoples money.
Of course, if you consider that our job, we can eliminate all that corruption by taking over the world and feeding all those starving kids directly.