It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


quote It’s the talk of the f---ing White House. /quote

page: 6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in


posted on Feb, 20 2018 @ 09:45 PM

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: soberbacchus

Here is the actual evidence.

Judge Orders Mueller to Provide Flynn’s Attorneys With 'Any Exculpatory Evidence'

A federal judge has issued an updated standing order in the case of U.S. v. Flynn, suggesting that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team may have withheld exculpatory evidence in prosecuting former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, United States district judge for the District of Columbia, on Friday issued what is called the “Brady rule," which requires the prosecution to turn over "any exculpatory evidence" to the defendant in a criminal case, meaning Mueller must provide Flynn with all information that is favorable to his defense.

So the Flynn plea might be off the table

it is going to burn the dems to the ground when this gets thrown out
i hope they cling to their rUsSiA until november
as there will be more scotus seats to fill

posted on Feb, 20 2018 @ 10:02 PM

originally posted by: shooterbrody
it is going to burn the dems to the ground when this gets thrown out
i hope they cling to their rUsSiA until november
as there will be more scotus seats to fill

That, and so far every single thing from the SC has
been process crimes and financial crimes.

Without the SC, there would be no process crimes.
That leave financial crimes from 2014 and earlier.

Even the Russian trolls were only charged with
financial crimes. Notice - No Electioneering.

And Nancy Pelosi is out there every day
freaking out about tax cuts and how
ungodly that is. These Dems have
really lost sight of what people actually
care about.

edit on 20-2-2018 by burntheships because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 01:17 AM

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: pavil

??? No indictment has indicated collusion.

My point exactly. And no big fish.

posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 05:38 AM
a reply to: JBurns

Got your stars for the day huh.
Everyone wants a piece of me. Lol. Get in line.
Of course nothing you said made any sense and so....

posted on Feb, 21 2018 @ 05:39 AM
This article is a good recent summary of events in the Flynn case.

The Michael Flynn guilty plea stinks to high-heaven

- The reason that Flynn was originally interviewed was mostly for suspected violations of the Logan Act - a law that has never been enforced and for which no one has ever been prosecuted.

- Acting Attorney General Sally Yates was the one who sent agents to interview Flynn. She was totally resistant to Trump, for which she was fired. She was also in the meeting Jan 5 to discuss the "Russia investigation", attended by Obama, Biden, Comey and Rice.

- Comey told Congress that agents who interviewed Flynn did not think he lied.

- The original judge on the Flynn case was mysteriously removed. It turns out he is also a FISA judge, and rumors are that he was the one that allowed the spying on US citizens based on the phony dossier.

- Flynn may have pleaded guilty only because he ran out of money and the FBI were threatening action against his son.

- The new judge, Sullivan, immediately demanded all exculpatory information on the case. He said that he would decide what was relevant, not the prosecutor. This is a rare request at the sentencing stage after a guilty plea. New evidence could include the findings in the Page FISA warrant situation, showing that any reasons to interview Flynn in the first place were based on illegal wire taps.

... more in the article

top topics
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in