Nancy Pelosi flails arms uncontrolably in latest rant against 'whites'

originally posted by: AMPTAH

The Donald said America should be letting in more people from Norway, and less from these other "S*hole" nations.

If he did say that are you sure he put in the time and effort that you put in it to connect something to his statement? I would say he has two concerns... One is we do not need to become a country of 100 million refugees since I'm sure there are billions that would come here in a second. Second, we do not need to open the flood gates to countries that just happen to be physically located near us when there are a lot of other countries that are not physically near us that would bring diversity with them too,.

a reply to: AMPTAH

So, their prosperity is a result of an accidental happenstance.

Same with the oil rich Murikkkans, eh? Or Iceland, Denmark and Finland for that matter?
Can't be the Scandinavian Model or something...

BTW, Sweden just happened to fall behind after adopting neoliberal "reforms" to "solve" their "banking" crisis in the 90ies. Who woulda "thunkt"?

Norway is filthy rich thanks to that oil, sure. Otherwise they'd probably just strive forward with a fresh nordic breeze as fcking usual.

This is why Norwegians don't want to immigrate to America. Because they'd then have to do an awful thing, like "work."

Let me flail my socialists arms uncontrollably around you, my sweet 'n silly piece of work! Work... you guys never really wrapped your heads around that Thing thing either, did you?

a reply to: JBurns

I noticed to changed the title and yet stilll chose bald faced lie..

Palosi waved arms and attacked trump..

She made zero comments against white people..


Man.. you went full retard in no time on here...

a reply to: TrueBrit
we need to make america great again because since busg senior every damn president up till january 19th 2017 have only been about lining there pockets . its not a race thing thats just what power brokers use to divide us.
i think jeff daniels speaks best truth about america the prevous 24 years www.youtube.com...

Get her out of here!
The woman has proven to be more harmful than beneficial for her party and constituents.

Skeletor needs to go...
Sadly her district predominantly consists of sea monkeys as voter's so I'm not holding my breath there.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Tundra

I will be the change I want to see. What will you do?

Laugh at you and cliché comments like this one. You might want to get to work at being that change instead of dreaming of that one day when you "will be."

a reply to: odzeandennz

For starters: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi slammed President Trump’s immigration plan as an effort to “make America white again.”

a reply to: neo96

Shhhhhh ... she is doing just fine! Even the millennials are figuring out that dividing us isn't right!

a reply to: smurfy

What has he done to be a racist? Oh, he lowered non-white unemployment to the lowest levels since the Johnson era?

a reply to: kaylaluv

That was a movie, and those scenes were put in it (50's) to show how awful that behavior is. This is Texas we move forward and lead. Don't fret.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Great is great. The opposite of crap. Btw, we're not going anywhere and to suggest it is pure racism aka La Raza.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

So when someone calls you a racist when you're not what are they again? The left has practiced race based politics so long the lie has become truth to some. I've seen where universities are regressing, professors punishing white students, whole left wing cities not protecting conservative speech. I guess reality isn't allowed to be logical anymore either.

a reply to: odzeandennz

Pelosi should give up her seat to an immigrant Hispanic person if that is what she feels.

a reply to: moyeti

Easy , they are Wrong, idiots, a political shill, misinformed, lying ,exc....

There are all kinds of options..


Racism has a very specific definition that is in no way “if you falsely accuse someone of racism..


Which is why I hate conservatism.. it has people lie to themselves wit the most broken logic ever..

Literally every rightwing talking point I can think of is s logical fallacy...


Guns don’t kill people..

GOVERNMENT is the problem...

The Bible says so..

Shiria law is comming to America...


It about Islam, but ignore the Bible has all the same horrific texts....


Trickledown economics...

War on drugs...

Exc..


The entire thing is based on playing off traditions to get poor people to protect their
Rich overlords..

a reply to: moyeti

You have seen individual examples of idiots at universities...

Individual idiots out of the MILLIONS or college professors and students..


That has been conservative bread and butter for a generation..


Find a single idiot with no real power, authority or following who makes your point for you and pretend they represent your opponents philosophy..


It is such a common and well known propaganda tactic it has its own funny little Latin name on the logical fallacy list..


It’s propagand for stupid people..

Which is why the vast majority of scientists, college professors and intellectuals are liberals..

They have taken debate classes and know a logical fallacy when they see one.

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: neo96

She is either white or the color of a Baboons ass .Maybe she is of mixed color

This is the most fitting reference ever dude. Nice clip. I adore that movie.

a reply to: proteus33

I would agree with you, if you went back quite a bit further than 24 years.

You could go back to just after the end of the Second World War, to find examples of American governments and administrations, making decisions which had nothing to do with the people, and everything to do with reinforcing the affluence of a scant few, politicians included.

Look at the Bush family. Prescott Bush, who was a senator at one time, was also a director and shareholder in companies which benefited from the rise of the Third Reich, despite knowing full well what the cost of his actions were. It was only in 1942 that his assets were seized under the Trading With The Enemy act. The war had been going on since 1939, and yet still, Bush was involved and happy to be. Also, General Motors were involved with Nazis, all for profit of course, and they did benefit from their association, in a financial sense.

Then you have the assassinations of figures from the socialist movements in South America, actions undertaken either directly by agents of the US government, or proxy agents from organisations created and trained for the purpose, by CIA operatives. Also, you have economic sabotage, committed by the same agency, for the same reasons, keeping all the profit and the trappings of wealth, concentrated in the United States, preventing success in South American nations to remain unchallenged financially, keep the neighbours poor and needy, so they could later be used as scapegoats for Americas problems. This sort of crap went on from the mid fifties, and as far as anyone can tell, is still going on to one extent or another. This sort of malarkey is what lead to the War on Drugs, which as near as an examination of actual historical context can show, turned out to be largely an excuse to keep already destabilised nations, from making the best of their natural resources and mineral wealth, as well as becoming an absolute money spinner for the private prison industry, and a control methodology to divide and disrupt people power at street level in America.

Then you have the debacle that is the beginnings of the War on Terror, a group of activities which should NEVER have been undertaken, the recruitment of Osama Bin Laden as a CIA asset, which to this day remains a problem, if only because no one can prove that he was no longer an asset by the time the 9/11 attacks came about, the creation of funding, supply and armament smuggling routes to feed the insurgency, and the birth of the monster that would eventually become IS, which is STILL a bought and paid for proxy outfit, which, whether the majority of its members realise it or not, owned and operated by the United States government and its allies. Its existence as an entity, in its various guises over the years, has bought about huge amounts of defence spending, permitted governments to violate the rights of their own citizens by illegal surveillance of their private business without probable cause, has enlivened the PMC industry...

This sort of pocket lining has been going on for DECADES longer than you seem to be taking account of. Its the underpinning of the modern United States. People like Trump are not here to fix that, because they do not see it as a problem. Trump has proven already, by his consistent refusal to speak only the truth, to refer to reality rather than his feelings, by his inability to be transparent about his businesses and their operation, and his involvement and debt exposure to hostile nations and organisations in hostile nations, that he has NO intention of Making America Great Again. He intends instead to continue the "fine" American tradition of bombing the hell out of innocent civilians, in proxy wars his nation actually started, against foes his nation invented and created and actually control from an agency perspective, and make money hand over fist from backhanders all the way along, which is exactly the same as it has always been.

The only things that differ about the man, when compared to previous abusers of their position is that he is a fascist appeasing turd, and too ill educated and poorly read to be believable, while acting the part for the camera. Even at a shell game for which the instructions are well known and documented, such as governing while robbing the people, a game many have played before him without so much as letting slip a fart, the current President of your country screws your people, and makes your citizens watch him do it, like some kind of sexual deviant running amok in a nunnery. He is an amateur at best, and a worse power player than you have ever seen at worst.

a reply to: [post=23159950]JoshuaCox[/post

Yes I have. Reality hurts, I know, but these things are out there and are being effected on real people. Perhaps if you left your liberal bubble. In a debate when you you use a derogatory you have already lost.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

So when a more fitting, more logically targeted pejorative is used against the "progressives" it is idiotic, but because someone has a bad day at the tanning both they are called racist for no actual reason it is OK. Deductively, this is going to be a great show to watch as the left's must beloved idioms burn.

a reply to: moyeti

What?!?!

I don’t at all know what point your trying to make....


I say “the right just finds random idiots and pretend they get to speak for “the left” and that is why all the scientists and intellectuals are liberals.”

You say reality hurts?!?!

Is that supposed to be a counterpoint?!!!

Lol..

I mean you are someone who thinks falsely accusing people of racism. Makes you a racist.. Webster’s dictionary definition be damned lol...

So.....


I often wonder if I’m not fooling myself expecting a logical conversation on a conspiracy site..