It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Does Mueller Indictment Mean Clinton Campaign Can Be Indicted for Chris Steele?

page: 5
53
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

I didn't think you would.



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert


ive used ths tactic before. i know it when i see it. GPS has a verifiable track record of shady things. dismissing it is foolish.



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 10:40 AM
link   
These criminal actions on the part of Hillary Clinton are
being investigated as we speak.

Several investigations.

Games up for her.



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 10:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: burntheships

They should be.

Perkins Coe,DNC,Clinton,Fusion GPS= Pedino. That California guy.

Steele= 13 Russian Nationals.


Yeah, and you know what else? Troll farms
paid for by Hillary Clinton - such as her prized
Correct The Record, and Shareblue.

I am sure there are handfuls of communists
paid postings all over the net, paid for by
Hillary herself. Her trolls should not be exempt.



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 10:50 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships




I am sure there are handfuls of communists paid postings all over the net, paid for by Hillary herself. Her trolls should not be exempt.


Those are called social justice bots!

I snip you not.



In addition to social justice bots, there are also bot services that seek to enhance everyday life online.


This has been a interesting read.




The Federal Elections Commission has shown no evidence of even recognizing that bots exist.


www.theatlantic.com...



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 10:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: introvert


ive used ths tactic before. i know it when i see it. GPS has a verifiable track record of shady things. dismissing it is foolish.


Ok. How does that equate to the Hillary campaign being indicted for something they had no choice in?



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: introvert


ive used ths tactic before. i know it when i see it. GPS has a verifiable track record of shady things. dismissing it is foolish.


Ok. How does that equate to the Hillary campaign being indicted for something they had no choice in?


Same for trump then. if the law is equal right?



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:08 AM
link   
That is utterly nonsensical and remeniscient of Snipbot.

www.thedailybeast.com...

Poor,Poor Clinton didn't have a choice!

She's just a victim of a corporate lawyer hired gun!



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:10 AM
link   
Hillary Clinton wrote the book on Sleaze.

Need I list all of the prior criminal matters
she has been involved with? Where to even
begin right?



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RadioRobert



FusionGPS is a well-known oppo research firm. What do you suggest their intent in hiring them was?


For them to do oppo research, just as they are well-known for.



Do you know any lawyers who hire services and accrue costs for their client without their clients prior approval and vetting?


No, but I'm not sure that means anything of substance in regards to this topic.



Clearly someone was not following the rules... Who should be the fall guy?


Ok. What laws were broken, who broke them and how is the Clinton campaign accountable?


Great! So you admit the obvious that they were being paid to produce oppo research finally. Nothing illegal about opposition research. Now, is opposition research subject to campaign finance laws regarding disclosure of use of funds? Was the use of those funds for opposition research disclosed accurately? Or was that campaign money described as "legal services"? Why did the campaign deny involvement for so long? Why was the service provided by third and fourth parties? Remember there is nothing illegal about hiring FusionGPS. So why not disclose it accurately instead of describing it as "legal services"?
So why would someone pay someone to pay someone to pay someone to pay someone simply to acquire a service that would otherwise be legal and above the board? Was it to avoid disclosure? Why do you think that might be relevant looking at the big picture as this slowly unravels?
edit on 17-2-2018 by RadioRobert because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:24 AM
link   
In rwnj land all things are possible but never materialize. a reply to: neo96



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: introvert


ive used ths tactic before. i know it when i see it. GPS has a verifiable track record of shady things. dismissing it is foolish.


Ok. How does that equate to the Hillary campaign being indicted for something they had no choice in?


Same for trump then. if the law is equal right?


The law is supposed to be equal. The difference thus far is that Trump hasn't broken any laws, but Hillary has.

I know that just isn't fair when you need Trump to be a criminal to vindicate your cognitive dissonance.

You are also correct about Hillary having no choice in breaking every law on the books. She just can't help herself.



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: neo96


No, unlike the alt rights popular belief the Dossier is not illegal. Sucks that now we are stuck with a illegitimate president, because of Russia.






This President is legit.

The last one was not. Fake birth cert shows he cant tell the truth and was under deep state control. The woman, who represented his true biological father Mohammad Subuh, was murdered sometime after presenting his fake cert on behalf of Hawaii



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: visitedbythem




The last one was not.


I wonder how many of his twitter followers were BOTS.




posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:36 AM
link   
That whole golden shower stuff is nonsense. Trump would never climb into a bed where two men had previously had sex



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: neo96


No, unlike the alt rights popular belief the Dossier is not illegal. Sucks that now we are stuck with a illegitimate president, because of Russia.

1. The existence of the dossier isn't really the problem. Ask your parents to explain it to you.
2. Winning the electoral vote IS legitimate. What's notnlegitinate is crying about the rules when you don't win. If you're next argument is "so and so cried too," that's even more pathetic.







posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: visitedbythem




The last one was not.


I wonder how many of his twitter followers were BOTS.




Most of them. He is a socialist, same as Russia, and China. He offered flexibility to Putin through Medvedev. The whole world saw that



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:41 AM
link   
a reply to: visitedbythem

The whole world saw Feinstein march out Simpson to legimatize a foreign spy's dossier.

They don't care.

Like they called it earlier in the thread.

Theres more proof on CLinton collusion than Trump collusion.



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: RadioRobert

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RadioRobert



FusionGPS is a well-known oppo research firm. What do you suggest their intent in hiring them was?


For them to do oppo research, just as they are well-known for.



Do you know any lawyers who hire services and accrue costs for their client without their clients prior approval and vetting?


No, but I'm not sure that means anything of substance in regards to this topic.



Clearly someone was not following the rules... Who should be the fall guy?


Ok. What laws were broken, who broke them and how is the Clinton campaign accountable?


Great! So you admit the obvious that they were being paid to produce oppo research finally. Nothing illegal about opposition research. Now, is opposition research subject to campaign finance laws regarding disclosure of use of funds? Was the use of those funds for opposition research disclosed accurately? Or was that campaign money described as "legal services"? Why did the campaign deny involvement for so long? Why was the service provided by third and fourth parties? Remember there is nothing illegal about hiring FusionGPS. So why not disclose it accurately instead of describing it as "legal services"?
So why would someone pay someone to pay someone to pay someone to pay someone simply to acquire a service that would otherwise be legal and above the board? Was it to avoid disclosure? Why do you think that might be relevant looking at the big picture as this slowly unravels?


Flashback:
Clinton Lawyer denies funding. Why?
Campaign lied about otherwise legal oppo work. Why?

Just a mystery, I guess why they funneled money (illegally) through third parties (laundered) to produce a service that would otherwise be above the board and then lied about it again to hide it instead of immediately clarifying to attempt to get on the right side of the legal lines. Curiouser and curiouser.



posted on Feb, 17 2018 @ 11:59 AM
link   
And people still think that bare chested, bear wrestling, crafty SOB just wanted Trump to win as the end goal. Nope, it was to turn up the pressure cooker on discord. Unrelated but look at gunners and anti-gunner over the recent shooting.The people are nearly ready to tear each other apart.

And that is what Putin wants, for America to fail on its own. Just like the USSR did. All Reagan did was force them to build more nukes and promote democracy until the cost collapsed them.




top topics



 
53
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join