16 people indicted by Robert Mueller's probe of election meddling to support Donald Trump

a reply to: JBurns

It's not over for Trump. Trump or his Campaign may not have had any direct dealings with these indicted people but that doesn't mean Cambridge Analytica didn't. CA collected copious data on Trump's behalf. Mueller only has to prove CA paid these troll farms.

www.vox.com...

a reply to: Sillyolme

There is no indication in public because it would cause another issue like the tarmac visit. Damn that was dumb and brazen.

Again. If he had ANYTHING actual on Trump it would be on the front page of every newspaper.

Who funded these guys who trashed Bernie and Trump? I think you know....

a reply to: Sillyolme


Nice deflection, but this isn't about the memo any more.

Mueller's CONCLUSION on Trump..lets get back to that

a reply to: matafuchs


Oh it is beyond obvious. And no big surprise either.

The establishment, but specifically HILLARY ROTTEN CLINTON.

Who else would go after the only two non-establishment puppets?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: matafuchs

When are they going to indict Hillary for disparaging Trump?

When the Mahdi comes home.

a reply to: kosmicjack


Oh it is absolutely over, KJ.

Otherwise Mueller simply excludes Trump/team from today's indictments as opposed to issuing a CONCLUSION regarding their alleged involvment. Nothing is by chance with a man like Mueller. All information in an indictment is crucial. And when you spell out that Party T is not involved in a conspiracy, it becomes very difficult to turn around and say Party T was involved in said conspiracy after all. The only way this happens is if more evidence somehow comes to light. Which is very unlikely, since Mueller never would've issued this CONCLUSION RE: Trump/team if there was more evidence to sort through/interviews/etc.

You must not have read the indictment or something, Kosmic. I'm disappointed.

Mueller specifically states that Trump/team wasn't involved in the conspiracy, but was manipulated. How do you twist that into "CA paying these troll farms." If that were a possibility, Mueller simply leaves Trump/team's names out of the indictment as he did with Manafort/Flynn/Papa. Mueller specifically stated today that they weren't involved in a conspiracy, with the language he used. Why effectively prevent yourself from prosecuting Trump/team when you can simply leave them out of the indictment entirely (as he always did before this)

You don't think he's investigated that already? If he didn't, he wouldn't have issued a CONCLUSION...

I can't wait for some legal analysts to explain this on the news. I am getting tired of copy/paste or typing. I am not that fast of a typist

a reply to: BaldBassist

At this time it has digressed into they had a very well structured Twitter and instagram campaign where they posted ideas about the election to try and get people to feel a certain way about it.

That’s is what they mean by “social media campaign”

The thing is the “personalities” were “fake” and being given things to say by what is alleged to be Russian state ran sources.

This is as basic as I can put it

a reply to: fatkid

Basically...Marketing....how is that illegal?

a reply to: matafuchs


Especially given the vast realm of information warfare/manipulation that our government/political parties/foreign interests use against us.

Hey, at least this sets the precedent for us to drive ALL Foreign interests out of this country now They were never wanted to begin with.

Time to re-Americanize this place.

But, but it's ok if illegals vote.

a reply to: matafuchs

I’m just explaining it for him because he asked

a reply to: JBurns

Yeah where was that conclusion published again? Because I missed it.
This is an indictment.

www.politico.com...

Here you read it. Highlight the conclusion and vindication part for the class.

Noose is closing...

16 indictments...

3 people on Trump's team already plead guilty to committing crimes...

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
But, but it's ok if illegals vote.

No it's not.

I've seen this deflection being used by many on this site and others.

It's amazing how fast narratives and such spread when necessary.

a reply to: matafuchs

Ah...okay...

Whistles a snappy tune.

a reply to: Sillyolme


Sure, for the part of the class that was sleeping...

The indictment charges that some of the Russian suspects interacted with Americans associated with the Trump campaign, but those associates did not realize they were being manipulated.

Game over

a reply to: Painterz

Must really be serious when you plead guilty and still don’t get sentenced, wow this is so serious I saw it on CNN. I really hope our government keeps spending time on it, it what we really need right now.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: matafuchs
Ah...okay...
Whistles a snappy tune.

...cuz the fat lady ain't sung yet, I'm thinking.

a reply to: Painterz


Which is exactly why this is so important

The indictment charges that some of the Russian suspects interacted with Americans associated with the Trump campaign, but those associates did not realize they were being manipulated.

They don't issue conclusions until the investigation is done. So since they issued a conclusion, it means they're done. With Trump anyhow.

Get ready for at least 3 more years (probably 6) of Trump and Trump's new America.

a reply to: JBurns

There was no CONCLUSION. LOL this is fun.