It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

White House refuses to reveal immigration status of Melania's parents

page: 2
15
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:48 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

Evidence free OP, and the people blindly believing it, on the next ATS.




posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus

Evidence free OP, and the people blindly believing it, on the next ATS.


What evidence are you missing?



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:50 AM
link   
You guys just don't get it. Campaign Platform Promises policies have to succeed in the public eye, not in actual fact.

So shhh, go read a tweet, start a social media race war or something. Everything is just fine. Your gubment has your best interests at heart.



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:50 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

evidence that anything wrong is actually happening

people are following laws

wahhhhh



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus

Evidence free OP, and the people blindly believing it, on the next ATS.


What evidence are you missing?


The immigration status of Melania’s Parents.



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Irishhaf

Nice way to deflect from answering my question to a whataboutism.


Not a deflection when all I did was point out this is literally a who gives a fart...

Every single president has had the ability to do this, so why exactly is it a problem now?

What about this is a scandal?



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Irishhaf

Do you enjoy leaders who encompass the saying, "do as I say, not as I do"?

This discussion is not about Obama , Pelosi , Reid , Schumer , McCain , etc.
This is about Melania's parents and their immigration status



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus

Evidence free OP, and the people blindly believing it, on the next ATS.

Big difference between carrying the flag and believing in it.

Flag bearers are usually zealots,

while those those marching along are getting paid to be there.



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:54 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus



DIFFERENT RULES for the Orange King vs. lowly citizens.

That right there negates any valid information that your OP may have contained.

edit on 2/15/18 by Gothmog because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Irishhaf

Where did I label this as a scandal? The OP is pointing out how Trump is acting hypocritically. He supported the law when he needed it to get his wife's family here but now he wants to say it is a problem for our country. It's not supposed to be a scandal. It's supposed to get a thinking person to say, "what a minute...".



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Irishhaf

Where did I label this as a scandal? The OP is pointing out how Trump is acting hypocritically. He supported the law when he needed it to get his wife's family here but now he wants to say it is a problem for our country. It's not supposed to be a scandal. It's supposed to get a thinking person to say, "what a minute...".


The OP is banking on unverified conjecture. So as a thinking person, your next thought is...what?



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:59 AM
link   
Huddled Masses that long to be free.

First off, they likely arent felons, so as far as my belief goes; If they arent committing crimes, they go on the back burner while we process the thugs out, which will take years.

Why are you wanting to deport her parents ahead of millions of others?




posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 10:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus

Evidence free OP, and the people blindly believing it, on the next ATS.


What evidence are you missing?


The immigration status of Melania’s Parents.


Ahhh...Well they have two possibilities, one being a tourist visa, which would seem very unlikely for a variety of reasons (the least of which is the amount of time they have been here) and the other possibility being the Family Visa IR-5.

If it was some unknown exotic form of extended Tourist Visa you would expect the WH to quickly explain the same rather than give a defensive answer?

This was the answer when the WH was asked what Visa they were here on:




White House official answered a question about the Knavses by saying
that while they were “not going to get into specific cases,” it was a “fallacy” to think that “just because a policy was in place in the past means it should continue indefinitely into the future.”


WHY would he answer that way if they were here on a Tourist Visa?

Please though...this is where I expect you to torture logic.
Have at it.




edit on 15-2-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 10:01 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Just about every topic on ATS banks on unverified conjecture. The mere mentioning of the "deep state" should be laughable to one such as you who demands tons of evidence to believe anything negative about Trump. I don't want to hear that load of baloney from you.
edit on 15-2-2018 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 10:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Butterfinger
Huddled Masses that long to be free.

First off, they likely arent felons, so as far as my belief goes; If they arent committing crimes, they go on the back burner while we process the thugs out, which will take years.

Why are you wanting to deport her parents ahead of millions of others?



There are "Millions" of people here legally on the Family Visa that are "thugs" and "committing crimes"?

Do you have some statistics for that?



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 10:04 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

Oh now there is two possibilities. That’s strange because according to your OP there isn’t.



Bottom lining it.

Trump brought his in-laws over via the IR-5 visa (family visa) to help look after Barron.

The same Visa he has been deriding and calling for the elimination of.

Cuz...It's HIM, not other people.


Why would you suppress one possibility in favour of another?



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 10:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Just about every topic on ATS banks on unverified conjecture. The mere mentioning of the "deep state" should be laughable to one such as you who demands tons of evidence to believe anything negative about Trump. I don't want to hear that load of baloney from you.


So much for a thinking person. What’s that again about holding standards to others you yourself refuse to follow?



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 10:09 AM
link   
I mean, i get the "gotcha" moment here....but what he is doing isn't illegal. He is using the immigration system as it is legally defined currently....and he is somehow derided for it?

Lost ya'll mind, i tell ya'.



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 10:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus

Oh now there is two possibilities. That’s strange because according to your OP there isn’t.



Bottom lining it.

Trump brought his in-laws over via the IR-5 visa (family visa) to help look after Barron.

The same Visa he has been deriding and calling for the elimination of.

Cuz...It's HIM, not other people.


Why would you suppress one possibility in favour of another?


Because each possibility comes with associated likelihood.
Like it is possible that a Mylar Balloon in a grainy youtube video is an extra-terrestrial craft, but it is more likely a Mylar balloon.

The answer the WH offered when asked what Visa the parents were here on was:


while they were “not going to get into specific cases,” it was a “fallacy” to think that “just because a policy was in place in the past means it should continue indefinitely into the future.”


That is not the answer a WH gives when they are here on a simple tourist visa.

That is the answer you give when they are here on a Visa Trump is demanding be eliminated.

Thank you for not disappointing though in breaking out your logic-torture-kit.



edit on 15-2-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 10:09 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

You would know. I've never seen you question anything positive about Trump, no matter how flimsy.




top topics



 
15
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join