It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus
Evidence free OP, and the people blindly believing it, on the next ATS.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus
Evidence free OP, and the people blindly believing it, on the next ATS.
What evidence are you missing?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Irishhaf
Nice way to deflect from answering my question to a whataboutism.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus
Evidence free OP, and the people blindly believing it, on the next ATS.
DIFFERENT RULES for the Orange King vs. lowly citizens.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Irishhaf
Where did I label this as a scandal? The OP is pointing out how Trump is acting hypocritically. He supported the law when he needed it to get his wife's family here but now he wants to say it is a problem for our country. It's not supposed to be a scandal. It's supposed to get a thinking person to say, "what a minute...".
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus
Evidence free OP, and the people blindly believing it, on the next ATS.
What evidence are you missing?
The immigration status of Melania’s Parents.
White House official answered a question about the Knavses by saying
that while they were “not going to get into specific cases,” it was a “fallacy” to think that “just because a policy was in place in the past means it should continue indefinitely into the future.”
originally posted by: Butterfinger
Huddled Masses that long to be free.
First off, they likely arent felons, so as far as my belief goes; If they arent committing crimes, they go on the back burner while we process the thugs out, which will take years.
Why are you wanting to deport her parents ahead of millions of others?
Bottom lining it.
Trump brought his in-laws over via the IR-5 visa (family visa) to help look after Barron.
The same Visa he has been deriding and calling for the elimination of.
Cuz...It's HIM, not other people.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Just about every topic on ATS banks on unverified conjecture. The mere mentioning of the "deep state" should be laughable to one such as you who demands tons of evidence to believe anything negative about Trump. I don't want to hear that load of baloney from you.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: soberbacchus
Oh now there is two possibilities. That’s strange because according to your OP there isn’t.
Bottom lining it.
Trump brought his in-laws over via the IR-5 visa (family visa) to help look after Barron.
The same Visa he has been deriding and calling for the elimination of.
Cuz...It's HIM, not other people.
Why would you suppress one possibility in favour of another?
while they were “not going to get into specific cases,” it was a “fallacy” to think that “just because a policy was in place in the past means it should continue indefinitely into the future.”