It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Humanoid alien wearing white suit outdoors (pic)

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 09:43 PM
link   
Does anyone remember an old color photo of a Caucasian humanoid appearing out of nowhere and in the foreground of the picture? If I remember correctly a photographer was taking several series of photos on top of a green mountain valley and in one of his exposures, there was this one picture that captured the image of a Nordic humanoid type of figure. Anyone remember this picture or know the whole story?

Thank you!




posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 09:45 PM
link   
Nope. Please embellish...
a reply to: GodKilla



posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: GodKilla


5. The Solway Firth Spaceman
This particular story is mired in conspiracy and has the public divided. Me, i'll post it here for your discernment because its steeped in ATS philosophy.....strip it and lets get to the bottom of it once and for all. "The GUT" might find this story interesting as well because the M.I.B feature therein.
Bloody good story nonetheless......




On May 24th, 1964, Jim Templeton, a fireman from Carlisle in North England, snapped some pictures of his young daughter out to the marches overlooking the Solway Firth. Although it was an uneventful outing, Templeton and his family noticed an odd "aura" to the area there - as if there was an electric charge in the air before a storm.
No storm came, but Templeton did observe that some nearby cows seems overly upset and spooked. A few days later, after the film was developed, Templeton was shocked to discover that a strange man appeared in one of the photos of his daughter even though they had been alone on the marshes. The man appeared to be wearing a space suit like an astronaut! Kodak offered a reward for anyone able to give a rational explanation for the space man picture, but no one was able to. Experts concluded that the picture was not the result of a double exposure, nor was it the result of tampering with the negative.



The mystery didn't end there.
Templeton reported that shortly after the picture became public, he was harassed by men in dark suits who asked him odd questions about the weather conditions on the marsh, bird behaviors, and what Templeton was doing out there on the first place. They then tried to make him admit that he had faked the picture and, when Templeton refused to, they became angry and left.

Cumberlandspaceman.co.uk


www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: GodKilla

Solway Firth Spaceman

ETA Sublimecraft's link is better and hes faster hehe

edit on 12-2-2018 by Vector99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 10:00 PM
link   
Thank you Sublimecraft, that’s it!!

I’ve been trying to re-review a lot of these old pictures for new clues. Thanks again



posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 11:20 PM
link   
i think that's his wife, seen from behind, overexposed.

www.bbc.com...



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: fiverx313
i think that's his wife, seen from behind, overexposed.

www.bbc.com...


Yeah, I've seen the same thing elsewhere several times over the past years. Likely that is his wife



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 01:16 AM
link   
a reply to: fiverx313

That's exactly what it was and this fraudster knew it.

In his original statement he swore he and his daughter were alone on the hillside.

When another photo, with his wife shown in it, from the same set came to light he swore she was behind him when the photo was taken.

It's obvious from the arm position it's a photo of someone's back and when you see the photo

of the wife it becomes apparent that the "spacesuit" is her sleeveless dress.

This photo had traction for decades, I still remember being captivated by it as a boy 35 years ago.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 05:44 AM
link   
That's one tall manly looking woman then dont ya think? Look at the arms on her?



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 06:24 AM
link   
That guy made a ton of $$$ as He was the first to market 'the hoody'. I can't tell if that is the full zip, 1/4 zip or non-zip but that is the back.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 06:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: JimNasium


That guy made a ton of $$$ as He was the first to market 'the hoody'. I can't tell if that is the full zip, 1/4 zip or non-zip but that is the back.


If that's true, it must of been one hell of a Marketing ploy.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 06:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: fiverx313
i think that's his wife, seen from behind, overexposed.

www.bbc.com...


I have never in my life heard it being his wife overexposed. I also don't see anywhere in that link where it states that.

What if it is something from maybe another dimension and the only reason we can see it is because it was in a picture? What IF there are people and beings around us all the time we can't see because we aren't in their "time."? I have often wondered that and to me it could be possible........or not.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 07:15 AM
link   
a reply to: mblahnikluver

It was his wife, the other photos prove without a doubt that he knew it was his wife.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 07:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: AdKiller
a reply to: mblahnikluver

It was his wife, the other photos prove without a doubt that he knew it was his wife.


What other photos?



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 07:29 AM
link   
a reply to: mblahnikluver

It was his wife, Annie. If there was a spaceman wandering about behind his daughter in the open do you not think that one of the three would have seen him/it?



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

very likely this



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:08 PM
link   
Here's some more analysis with other photos taken the same day showing the wife

debunkedmyth.blogspot.com...



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: fiverx313

That's exactly what it was and this fraudster knew it.

In his original statement he swore he and his daughter were alone on the hillside.

When another photo, with his wife shown in it, from the same set came to light he swore she was behind him when the photo was taken.

It's obvious from the arm position it's a photo of someone's back and when you see the photo

of the wife it becomes apparent that the "spacesuit" is her sleeveless dress.

This photo had traction for decades, I still remember being captivated by it as a boy 35 years ago.

It amazes me when I see a mindset such as yours. I instinctively wonder why? Do MIB's actually wear, white?


When another photo, with his wife shown in it, from the same set came to light he swore she was behind him when the photo was taken.
Can you produce this photo?

I think, maybe, this wife you speak of, was actually wearing a "Cloaking" suit, not a dress. A suit that had a little oppsi happen.

Are you trying to cover the wife's tracks, sort of speaking? Or are you pointing them out.

Interesting tid bit from the story.


The photograph was then sent by the Cumberland News team ‘down under’ following a request and was published in Australian newspapers, soon after. The Australians contacted Jim directly and requested a copy of the negative of the picture.

Shortly after this, Jim reported that a Technician from the ‘Blue Streak missile project’ in Australia contacted him and told him they had spotted similar looking figures, wandering around the launchpad, during an aborted countdown on May 23rd (the same day).
spacemancentral.com...



The Wife's headgear kind of gives it away. Don't ya think it looks kind of like "Netting"??



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: vlawde
Here's some more analysis with other photos taken the same day showing the wife

debunkedmyth.blogspot.com...
This other source says that's her older sister in the other photo instead of the wife. Whoever it is, it's easy enough to believe the "spaceman" is just a person facing away from the camera, I don't know what's so hard to accept about that.

fotocat.blogspot.com.es...


"3. Elizabeth and her older sister, same morning and place. © James P. Templeton, courtesy of Dave Armitage."

In the last few years, several researchers have graphically demonstrated the now accepted conclusion to this photograph, i.e., that it just shows a normal person, moving behind the child that escaped the attention of the cameraman, who was preoccupied with taking the picture. Motion and wrong focus produced the blurred, spurious image


edit on 2018213 by Arbitrageur because: clarification



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Arbitrageur

Whoever it is, it's easy enough to believe it's just a person facing away from the camera, I don't know what's so hard to accept about that.
Its not hard at all, that is exactly what we see. Its the "Who" "What" "Where" and "Why", of this person that is the puzzle.

Just a "Person"? Why was that person there, for a split second? You know, ramifications?

So maybe, the "Watchers" have finally been "Watched"? No, couldn't be, must be anything but that.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join