It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ex CIA Director Brennan Target of Perjury Investigation

page: 3
51
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 14 2018 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

I just hope when it's all said and done we can do to barry, as a country, what egypt did to hatshepsut.




posted on Feb, 14 2018 @ 09:32 AM
link   
Good.

Lock this "Boris" look-alike up


I imagine Brennan speaking in one continuous and monotone voice droning on and on about banal subjects.

I have a feeling people pretend to listen to him due to his clearly deteriorating mental status.



posted on Feb, 14 2018 @ 10:48 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus


Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.


So, some of it might be true, but mostly not.... And what was the source giving him the intel ?

Russian Agents, wasn't it ?

So Russian Agents, gave Steel information that would influence the election ; By smear or allegation against another candidate ? HRC's campaign and the DNC, laundered money through a law firm paying out to Russians to get slanderous information that could influence people not to vote for Trump....

Isn't that colluding with Russians to influence an American election ?



posted on Feb, 14 2018 @ 11:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: soberbacchus


Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.


So, some of it might be true, but mostly not.... And what was the source giving him the intel ?

Russian Agents, wasn't it ?


That's the way spying works.

They don't look to Jim at the corner gas station for FSB secrets, they talk to people with inside knowledge.

Impossible to have normal debate with folks that refuse to cognate.

BTW - Trump banged a Porn Star while his wife was still nursing Barron.
Hi lawyer admitted to paying her off last night.

Trump's defense that he is too much a germophobe to watch hookers pee or has any moral standards is not credible.

Reporting is that there are at least 3 video's of trump+hookers up for sale in Europe right now by current or former FSB looking to cash in. The CIA turned down an offer just last year.

Eventually it is going to hit the fan.



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 08:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: soberbacchus


Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.


So, some of it might be true, but mostly not.... And what was the source giving him the intel ?

Russian Agents, wasn't it ?


That's the way spying works.



So HRC campaign, and the DNC cooperated with a hostile foreign government to spy on a political candidate? And you're ok with that ? That's not colluding with Russia to influence a U.S. election ?


They don't look to Jim at the corner gas station for FSB secrets, they talk to people with inside knowledge.



So, again they hired someone through laundered payments, and cooperated with the Russian Government to spy on the opposition, and you're ok with that ?


Impossible to have normal debate with folks that refuse to cognate.



Wasn't it you that couldn't read a paragraph written in plain English, and then had a complete melt down when pointed out you misunderstood what you were reading ? Ya that was you.


BTW - Trump banged a Porn Star while his wife was still nursing Barron.
Hi lawyer admitted to paying her off last night.



Jealous much ? And so what ? That have something to do with anything ? bill Clinton cheated on his wife lots of times, and you were like 'so what it's just sex'. So again, what does that have to do with anything ? Nothing, correct.



Reporting is that there are at least 3 video's of trump+hookers up for sale in Europe right now by current or former FSB looking to cash in. The CIA turned down an offer just last year.



ROFLMAO... Ya we all read/heard about the Adam Schiff phone call. Funny stuff.

edit on 15-2-2018 by CrawlingChaos because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 08:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: soberbacchus


Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.


So, some of it might be true, but mostly not.... And what was the source giving him the intel ?

Russian Agents, wasn't it ?


That's the way spying works.



So HRC campaign, and the DNC cooperated with a hostile foreign government


Yes..in the same way the CIA "cooperates with" North Korea when it spies on them?

Jesus...can't have rational discussions with partisan-malformed brains.



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 09:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: soberbacchus


Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.


So, some of it might be true, but mostly not.... And what was the source giving him the intel ?

Russian Agents, wasn't it ?


That's the way spying works.



So HRC campaign, and the DNC cooperated with a hostile foreign government


Yes..in the same way the CIA "cooperates with" North Korea when it spies on them?

Jesus...can't have rational discussions with partisan-malformed brains.


I know which branch, and with which authority the CIA operates.

Which branch of government is the HRC campaign affiliated to ? What U.S. Code do they operate under ?

So if HRC campaign and the DNC, make laundered payments to agents of a foreign hostile government are they colluding to influence an election ? Under what authority does the DNC and HRC campaign operate, that allows them to negotiate on behalf of the U.S. Government or it's I.C. branches ?


Jesus...can't have rational discussions with partisan-malformed brains.


Is there something wrong with you ? Like is there some medication you're supposed to take ? Do you talk to everyone like that ? Did no one buy you a puppy as a child ?


edit on 15-2-2018 by CrawlingChaos because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 10:15 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus


Reporting is that there are at least 3 video's of trump+hookers up for sale in Europe right now by current or former FSB looking to cash in. The CIA turned down an offer just last year.


LOL! I heard about that. According to reports, the CIA paid $100,000 for what was touted as a video of Trump with a hooker, but it turned out the video was so blurry the guy could be anybody. The CIA denied the story.



posted on Feb, 15 2018 @ 11:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: soberbacchus


Reporting is that there are at least 3 video's of trump+hookers up for sale in Europe right now by current or former FSB looking to cash in. The CIA turned down an offer just last year.


LOL! I heard about that. According to reports, the CIA paid $100,000 for what was touted as a video of Trump with a hooker, but it turned out the video was so blurry the guy could be anybody. The CIA denied the story.


You seem to be confused or made that up.

The CIA was pitched a listing of what NSA Hacker tools were stolen, they were then offered the Trump Tape and refused it.



posted on Feb, 16 2018 @ 05:17 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

He needs to face the consequences.

I thought he was an spy, not a politician.

Intelligence...more like illegal self serving crap.
Disband the CIA.


edit on 2 16 2018 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2018 @ 06:39 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

What tape? There was an offer. Nothing was ever exchanged except for the CIA losing 100k, which they paid to receive nothing. Now...their story is what it is. But those SOBs lie for a living.



posted on Feb, 16 2018 @ 07:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: mobiusmale

originally posted by: Butterfinger

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
All I care about is if the info in the dossier is true or false. If it was false there is a problem. if it is true then the problem is Trumps and all these allegations of an improper FISA process are worthless. Give the actions of the right here it would sure appear that the dossier has some serious nuggets of truth.


Youre guessing at actions and press releases, or lack thereof.

Facts are in. HRC, DNC, FBI, CIA, DOJ... all are involved with creating, pushing it, or trying to clear a path for this Collusiuon narrative via the dossier.



And ironically the only clear evidence of collusion with Russia was between them and the Clintons (and their Foundation), the State Department and the DNC. The only clear evidence of Obstruction of Justice are actions taken by the DOJ (including Lynch), the FBI (including Comey and before him Mueller), the Clintons and possibly (okay, likely) even Obama himself.

Pushing the Trump/Russia collusion narrative - with the complete and active support of the MSM - is one of the most spectacular smoke screens, or diversion tactics, I have ever witnessed.

Unfortunately, for a lot of people, the one big flaw in their master plan was that they believed the Polls that said that Hillary had a 95% chance of winning the Presidency...now (the) FOX (instead of CNN) is definitely on the inside of the (hen) house, and the corruption onion is slowing being pealed, layer by layer.



Here, it's an older one but it has some good stuff.









One more on the dossier




edit on 2 16 2018 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)

edit on 2 16 2018 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2018 @ 09:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: soberbacchus

What tape? There was an offer. Nothing was ever exchanged except for the CIA losing 100k, which they paid to receive nothing. Now...their story is what it is. But those SOBs lie for a living.


The CIA said that the guy showed them a 15 second "trailor" clip of someone that looked like Trump with Hookers.
They said their was no way to confirm from the clip it was actually Trump.
They also suspected the whole thing could be a Russian operation to further sow discord and pit the CIA against Trump.
They refused to proceed and turned down all offers of Trump Kompromat.
This was not just the CIA saying it, there was some US Businessman that the NYT interviewed that was working as an intermediary that confirmed it.
Lastly, just for accuracy. The CIA did not make the 100k payment to the Russian, it was the intermediary. It's not clear that the CIA reimbursed him. It might have been the go-between putting a down payment in hopes of a full fee when the deal closed.

The CIA, The intermediary and others the NYTs talked to all said it was definitely bait and switch. CIA was pitched a listing of NSA hacker tools that had been stolen/compromised, then eventually pitched the Trump Material and didn't deliver the hacker tools, saying the FSB had told him not to sell the hacker tools...Which also means they must have approved him trying to sell the Kompromat.

Other outlets, including the NYTs have said shady characters in Europe that have FSB associations have tried to sell a "Trump Tape" and also said they didn't buy, mostly because there was no way to validate it was Trump on the "Preview" clip of the video they were shown.
edit on 16-2-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2018 @ 10:05 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

Probably someone dressed up like Biff Tannen doing a Back to the Future parody porn. LOL

That is a reasonable synopsis. I still don't believe anything the CIA ever says, though.



posted on Feb, 16 2018 @ 10:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: soberbacchus

Probably someone dressed up like Biff Tannen doing a Back to the Future parody porn. LOL

That is a reasonable synopsis. I still don't believe anything the CIA ever says, though.


There is money to be had there for Trump look-a-likes.



posted on Apr, 5 2018 @ 08:16 PM
link   
April 5, 2018

This is unreal! It seems that FBI Director CHRISTOPHER WRAY and DOJ Asst A.G. ROD ROSENSTEIN are protecting Obama's CIA Director JOHN BRENNAN.

For months, various congressional committees have been attempting to obtain the Electronic Intercepts that triggered the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign in 2016.

When Congress attempted to get these early last year, the FBI told them to "drop dead". I think Trey Gowdy was heading up the investigation then. He immediately backed-off, for some reason.

Now, Chairman Devin Nunes has requested the same document(s). Only this time, the FBI and the DOJ have been stalling. When he finally received the key document last month, it was dipped in black ink...all the important details were not viewable.

Instead of backing down like Trey Gowdy did, Devin Nunes is preparing to take legal action, if the CLEAN/ORIGINAL document is not produced by April 11, 2018.

STORY: theconservativetreehouse.com...-14774 1

I'm not quite sure how, but the article says that former CIA Director JOHN BRENNAN is a key operator in the spying on candidate, and then President-elect Donald Trump, his family, and his campaign staff.



posted on Apr, 5 2018 @ 08:26 PM
link   
This is stupid, we have a President and his administration who are all criminals and the retarded Republicans are complaining about a file?! Nunes is an ass hopefully he will be voted out soon.



posted on Apr, 5 2018 @ 08:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: CB328
This is stupid, we have a President and his administration who are all criminals and the retarded Republicans are complaining about a file?! Nunes is an ass hopefully he will be voted out soon.


What if Bob Mueller finds "a file" that enables him to charge President Trump with a crime. Would you then like FILES better? Would you have more respect for the POWER of files????




top topics



 
51
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join