It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ex CIA Director Brennan Target of Perjury Investigation

page: 2
51
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 04:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
The only way these guys are going to stop lying and trampling on our rights are if they know it'll come back to bite them on the ass, hard.

And their agency as well. A 50% reduction across the board (salaries, operational expenses, logistics, etc.). After that's been meted out, poll the surviving employees on what they would consider a fair penalty for the liars.




posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 04:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Butterfinger

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
All I care about is if the info in the dossier is true or false. If it was false there is a problem. if it is true then the problem is Trumps and all these allegations of an improper FISA process are worthless. Give the actions of the right here it would sure appear that the dossier has some serious nuggets of truth.


Youre guessing at actions and press releases, or lack thereof.

Facts are in. HRC, DNC, FBI, CIA, DOJ... all are involved with creating, pushing it, or trying to clear a path for this Collusiuon narrative via the dossier.



And ironically the only clear evidence of collusion with Russia was between them and the Clintons (and their Foundation), the State Department and the DNC. The only clear evidence of Obstruction of Justice are actions taken by the DOJ (including Lynch), the FBI (including Comey and before him Mueller), the Clintons and possibly (okay, likely) even Obama himself.

Pushing the Trump/Russia collusion narrative - with the complete and active support of the MSM - is one of the most spectacular smoke screens, or diversion tactics, I have ever witnessed.

Unfortunately, for a lot of people, the one big flaw in their master plan was that they believed the Polls that said that Hillary had a 95% chance of winning the Presidency...now (the) FOX (instead of CNN) is definitely on the inside of the (hen) house, and the corruption onion is slowing being pealed, layer by layer.



posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 04:46 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

We could quit with the "get out of jail free" cards, and stop paying pensions /insurance on these bastards.

You take away their unofficial tax exempt status - stop paying their undeserved pensions, and stop giving away health care- and all of a sudden you'll have these bastards rolling on each other left and right. ..

It would be truly entertaining to hear what really occurs at these fine institutions. ..



posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 04:56 PM
link   
a reply to: mobiusmale

That is the playbook , accuse your opponent of what you are doing yourself . All this crap is because Hillary lost .



posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Dear Viewers,

This is Trumps fault because had he not announced his candidacy then the deep state would not have needed to spy on him.

Now, back to the North Korean Princess....

Yours Sincerely,
CNN & the tards.



posted on Feb, 12 2018 @ 08:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hewhowaits


It would be truly entertaining to hear what really occurs at these fine institutions. ..


Apparently, it is a very politically charged atmosphere, where they
make fun of lots of different people.

Sad, I don't know how some of them keep their head up.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 02:06 AM
link   
I wish Hillary would have won, so we wouldn't' have to hear about all of this email nonsense.

/sarcasm



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 08:30 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

I can't find any substance in your OP?

Has a recommendation been made to the IG or DOJ?

Can you quote where in testimony you think Brennan lied? Specifically?



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 11:18 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

Link to article





Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.

In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”

Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.


Some intelligence head......doesn't even know what the DOJ knew for a year.

He's got some splaining to do.
edit on 13-2-2018 by pavil because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 11:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: soberbacchus

Link to article





Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.

In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”

Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.


Some intelligence head......doesn't even know what the DOJ knew for a year.

He's got some splaining to do.


That's repeating the talking head.

Where is the transcript of Brennan's testimony?



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:01 PM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

I'm sure Nunes has those transcripts. You could try asking him.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

This made me laugh.

Thank you for your great sense of humor Sublime!




posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

Where is the transcript of Brennan's testimony?


It was closed door setting I think.

Nunes has the transcript.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:08 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

He is such an evil man.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Sending it into the universe again today!



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: soberbacchus

Link to article





Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.

In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”

Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.


Some intelligence head......doesn't even know what the DOJ knew for a year.

He's got some splaining to do.


That's repeating the talking head.

Where is the transcript of Brennan's testimony?


Coming from someone who thinks the Steele Dossier is true.

Nice.

Realclearpolitics is a legit site. I'll let this play out and then you can apologize.

Here's a good bit from the CNN transcripts where he isn't weasiling out on actually answering a question:

BRENNAN: Yes, it is because it's not CIA's job to make a determination about whether a U.S. person is cooperating, colluding, or whatever in some type of criminal or legal matter.

[10:45:10] It is our responsibility to give the Bureau everything that they need in order to follow that path and make such a determination and recommendation if they want to press charges.




edit on 13-2-2018 by pavil because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 12:59 PM
link   
FBI, HRC, CIA, NBC, MI6,CNN,DOJ,DNC all involved. Train accidents, powder mail. This is getting dicey!



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 01:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: soberbacchus

Link to article





Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.

In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”

Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.


Some intelligence head......doesn't even know what the DOJ knew for a year.

He's got some splaining to do.


That's repeating the talking head.

Where is the transcript of Brennan's testimony?


Coming from someone who thinks the Steele Dossier is true.


Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.






Realclearpolitics is a legit site. I'll let this play out and then you can apologize.


RCP is an aggregate site that simply posts other people's articles.

The CIA's conclusion on Russian Interference was not based on the Dossier.

The FBI is not the CIA. You have to be a Trump supporter to confuse the two.




edit on 13-2-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: soberbacchus

Link to article





Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.

In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”

Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.


Some intelligence head......doesn't even know what the DOJ knew for a year.

He's got some splaining to do.


That's repeating the talking head.

Where is the transcript of Brennan's testimony?


Coming from someone who thinks the Steele Dossier is true.


Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.






Realclearpolitics is a legit site. I'll let this play out and then you can apologize.


RCP is an aggregate site that simply posts other people's articles.

The CIA's conclusion on Russian Interference was not based on the Dossier.

The FBI is not the CIA. You have to be a Trump supporter to confuse the two.





Again, I'll wait to see how this all plays out. You obviously know it all already.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 11:51 PM
link   



new topics

top topics



 
51
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join