-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

originally posted by: Tempter

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: AnkhMorpork

So ridiculous!!!!!! I have always thought he wore his pants way too short. Every time he sits down they are like...2 inches under his knees! I assumed they decided the vines were needed to cover up the ankles! Lol.

Ivy is growth. It connects. It's symbolic, this painting. He is the one who is tied to both sides. The Infiltrator. The Deceiver.

I hope you're not admiring and glorifying him.. jk!

I know what Obama's like and what he's about, as I had a close friend who exhibited the same traits.

Things always came easy for Obama, who had a certain knack for being a bit of a chameleon of sorts and who learned early on that the right words and mannerisms and by cajoling people he could generally slide right on through every time.

Having a malleable personality with strong training in socialist ideological principals as a point of leverage by which to "rule" Obama was groomed by the CIA to become President long before he ran for office.

He's all about image however, from the way he walks to the way he talks. Fundamentally, there's very little or nothing that's truly authentic about Obama. For him it's all about image and appearing in a certain way, sounding the right way, filling a role, but there's really no there there. All fluff and no substance.

Deciever would be a good way to describe him.

The place where the left meets and intersects the left hand path is the path of convenience and "expediency" which inwardly snickers over everything that's running in the background like a racket, a mobsters racket.

"Whitewashed sepulchres filled with dead men's bones and all corruption!"

Peronsally, i was extremely disappointed to see him running Bush's football down the field and to discover that he was really a globalist luciferian satanist who fed on the limelight and the MSM-driven celebrity culture, his role the cool guy, the bro, while the people ate it up, for a time..

It's pathetic. Nothing there to really be admired at all, and for him to glom onto MLK is really the height of absurdity and hypocrisy.

That he and his wife (regarding of her true sex) are and were also reverse racists of a sort with their all-black parties at the Whitehouse, isn't suprising.

I don't think there's any real there there, at all, in the final analysis.

Just a stuffed suit sitting on the edge of his chair overgrown with the slave garden. It's sad, and if I were them I'd be angry about it. It's not even funny, just sad and pathetic.

If these are "the heart wars" where it could be said that "when the hearts of men change, kingdoms will change" (John the Baptist), then they've got a lot to cry over.

And if Q is to be believed, and I think he/they are credible, then from their perspective and POV (Obamas, Clintons etc) all is lost and Babylon is tree times fallen!!!

And in some strange way the presentation of the portraits today somehow epitomizes it, according to all their best and worst intentions summed up, right down to the selection of the artists to the finished works.

It's funny, actually. Funny sad.

Is this the start off all the Seal indictment

Thirty-six Defendants indictment for Alleged Roles in Transnational Criminal Organization Responsible for More than $530 Million in Losses from Cybercrimes

Seal indictment



files.abovetopsecret.com...

In that portrait painting of Barack Obama, why depict him sitting on the edge of his chair partially obscured by the bushes and leaves? Also when you view it in a certain perspective it's very unbecoming and unflattering, with his right leg narrowed to a point, and both feet "hobbled" by the vegetation, his left hand the prominent one, his right touching his left leg. Step back and take another look at the whole composition..

When I consider what Q posted today


I find that the violet flower at his right foot distinctly reminds me of a segement early in this annimated short that so many already know so well called "I Pet Goat II"


In a rather creepy turn, this relates to the Sandy Hook massacre and a little girl in a red dress photographed with Obama, as described at one time by the creator of the film (now stricken from his website).

Operation Merlin (tech).
>Iran
>NK
Iran Deal (funding).
>Iran
>NK
>T cells
>Payoffs
NK Nuclear (mini suc)(icbm suc)
>War engine
>Protection
Q

originally posted by: Skyfloating

I think Q might have ranked them this way on purpose. It would appear that Soros is on top of the Pyramid, Rothschilds second and Saudi Royalty third. But since he ranked Saud first, Rothschild second and Soros third, it may be that Saudi Royalty held the capstone of the Pyramid.

The reason this would make sense to me is because those peoples palaces and mansions are so ridiculously opulent they make anything Rothschilds or Soros own look bland. What if they started by taken down the mega-trillionaire Saudis because they were closer to the top of the structure? What if thats why Trump FIRST visited and met with the Arabs?

A) I go away for a couple days and POOF! everybody was gone from the other thread. onward and upward!

B) and I do actually mean B is still incognito. one of the anons said she's still there, but you have to know where to look. B has been a very valuable asset...losing her input would be tantamount to losing Dashen here. (thanks for all you guys' hard work!) I hope that we can manage to get B to resurface.

C) regarding money and rank. the Saudis being the capstone OR cornerstone would make absolute sense. the Rothschilds and soros have money, yeah, but the middle East has a solid how many thousands of years lead on them? the middle East IS money. empires built upon vast amounts of wealth. their wallets may not be fat, but when you have a golden palace you don't need no stinkin wallet.

a reply to: Trillium

Breaking more seal indictment



Twitter

originally posted by: METACOMET

Operation Merlin (tech).
>Iran
>NK
Iran Deal (funding).
>Iran
>NK
>T cells
>Payoffs
NK Nuclear (mini suc)(icbm suc)
>War engine
>Protection
Q

The Wiki on it

Merlin

I hear Hanoi is educational.
Q

Think image drop.
Think OP.
Think United.
When does a bird sing?
Everything has meaning.
[I]
Q

Interesting image on her shirt.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Re: Bill Clinton chair leg:

I don't have a thought on this either way...but here is some forensic evidence regarding the photo:

I see evidence of photo shopping

See Image:
twitter.com...

If, indeed, photo shopped...the question is WHY?

Ok so along the line of thought regarding the chair, the way he looks like he was placed into the image...kind of awkward and weird, he appears to sit higher as someone mentioned...which can be symbolic of a place of power. Magnolias are the national flower of North Korea, and the question of who really controls NK...

Idk...just bouncing all this back and forth with my neighbor. And he feels like the reason they wanted Hillary in that oval office so badly was to put Bill back into power. He thinks Hillary is just a patsy. I thought that was a pretty interesting idea so I'm sharing it.

originally posted by: METACOMET

Interesting image on her shirt.

What is it, flowers? If I zoom it just gets blurry.

These people are stupid!

Sexually
Transgressive
Unrepentant
Pedophiles
Invoking
Demons, Darkness, Death, Destruction

STUPID

a reply to: METACOMET


That's an August 2015 photo of Ruth Ginsburg with Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung, of Vietnam.
www.vietnambreakingnews.com...

Re: qcodefag.github.io...
Perhaps the next Q post, #750, is a clue to Nguyen Dung, or (less likely) Ruth Ginsburg? There was an Operation to put someone on a United airlines flight (to Gitmo) to make them sing.

747Feb 12 2018 15:15:20Q!UW.yye1fxoID: 4bcc84354139

Our attack on big pharma came w/ a warning letter today. Message received. Response forthcoming. Q

qcodefag.github.io...


When I first read this I took it as: they sent big pharma a message and were expecting a response from them.

Now, add in the context of the letter scare at Trump Jrs.

Could it be that they went after big pharma and the letter was a warning from them?

Q's time stamp is 15:15. Isn't that 3:15 pm? Then Trump Jr. Tweets about his white and the scare at 4:31 pm.

a reply to: nikkib0421

This is my big problem with Q. The socratic method requires concise statements and questions as well as feedback. Q gives neither (because it's probably just a troll group)

If we read this as a whole statement, it says:
1) Q team attacked big pharma and sent a warning letter
2) Confirmation that big pharma received the message (odd to claim something is received rather than delivered if you sent it)
3) Waiting for response. (Doesn't make sense, forthcoming requires inside knowledge)

If we read it as individual sentences it's completely different.
1) Attacked big pharma and warned them (if he was referring to big pharma responding to the attack w/ warning letter he used all of the wrong words, you can't change the meaning of this sentence because it's not ambiguous)
2) Q team received a message.
3) Q team will respond soon.

Neither of these makes much sense but the second one is logical. They attacked big pharma and warned them, pharma struck back, Q team will respond.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

The flower on the apple is a lotus.
The flower between Ginsburg and the Vietnamese Justice is a lotus.
Lotus Eaters

a reply to: Dfairlite The attack on big pharma came at state of the union it was in trumps speech Q is implying the envelope to dt junior was a response from big pharma and Q said message received response forthcoming meaning there will be a response to the envelope being sent to Donald jr that's how I read it anyway

a reply to: butcherguy

White lotus society is something that rings a bell. I wondered about that before but the other pics were identified as Magnolias (remember the movie Magnolia anyone? Raining frogs!!!).
Also Blue lotus was considered a myth but is actually a psychoactive plant associated with ancient Egypt and ritual magic.

I'm just riffing from memory here.

from #742

Perfectly lined up?
Why?

The heads (and also the shoulders) of the people lined up in the second row form wave patterns echoing the waves in the painting.


Interpretation 1) There is a 3D wave pattern spreading from an unknown source out of the picture but positioned in direction of the viewer (us). The unknown source is the hidden hand, the puppeteer controlling both Bill Clinton and Kim Jong-il who in turn control the line behind them, who controll the waves spreading out behind them and so on.

Interpretation 2) wave particle duality - we (society) look at the individual politicians and expect the behaviour of particles but in truth they also act like a wave.

And as for reality?

I think Professor Feynman has the last word on that one, too: “ … the paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling of what reality ought to be.”

Explainer: what is wave-particle duality