-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

#874 (snippet)

JA - have you learned & eliminated L-6?

JA = Julian Assange
L-6 = Leaker #6?

Leaker #6: The person who just leaked secret information about the US drone program to the Intercept and Der Spiegel. This also might be Leaker #2, since there is a Germany connection. According to the Intercept: "The slides were provided by a source with knowledge of the U.S. government's drone program who declined to be identified because of fears of retribution." That implies someone new.

Leaker #2: The person who leaked secret documents to Jake Appelbaum, Laura Poitras, and others in Germany: the Angela Merkel surveillance story, the TAO catalog, the X-KEYSCORE rules. My guess is that this is either an NSA employee or contractor working in Germany, or someone from German intelligence who has access to NSA documents. Snowden has said that he is not the source for the Merkel story, and Greenwald has confirmed that the Snowden documents are not the source for the X-KEYSCORE rules. This might be the "high-ranking NSA employee in Germany" -- or maybe that's someone else entirely.

link you will have to manually add WikiLeaks dot org for the link to work.

ETA:

Leaker #5: The person who leaked secret information about WTO spying to the Intercept and the New Zealand Herald. This isn't Snowden; the Intercept is very careful to identify him as the source when it writes about the documents he provided. Neither publication give any indication of how it was obtained. This might be Leaker #2 since it contains X-KEYSCORE rules.

So leakers #2, #5 and #6 might all be the same. Is A suggesting leaker #6 was feeding Assange's disinfo? Leaker #1 according to this link would be Edward Snowden btw.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

A build for you TOL:

Queen Elizabeth has a friendship with the Aga Khan, ostensibly through horse racing.

An image search will throw up photos of them always smiling in each other's company and almost bowing to each other.

This might indicate horse racing is used as a way of unofficially meeting for the Queen and many rich arabs also into horse racing.

Follow the horses?

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Was the low alloy steel used in WTC buildings?

May be worth checking which airports in US and Asia Mauritania Airlines flies to/from!

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Re Internet Bill Of Rights, this Tweet implies there are only 1544 signatures on the whitehouse petition for it?

a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex

I did a search on C-link and found this answer funny in a Toilet humour kinda way. A C-link is what hooks together the arm of a float and the siphon, so it makes the loo flush!

I have a gut instinct that a C-link is to do with joining together 2 otherwise separate telecommunications networks. Wouldn't google want to join NK network with rest of the globe so CIA get a full set of data to analyse?

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Was Margaret Trudeau also a "womb" to strengthen a bloodline?

Who was she having an affair with 9 months before Justin was born?

Q started mentioning Snowden Nov 6, about a week after dropping his first crumbs. On Jan 23 he started trolling him through use of @Snowden. Yesterday Q hinted strongly that we will see live footage of Snowden within 24 hours. @Snowden We are going LIVE -24 [comb your hair].. To me that sounds like he will either be arrested or spill the beans on an important topic in a live stream.

Snowden and his girlfriend both grew up in the vicinity of the NSA centre at Fort Meade in Maryland and Q directed our attention to The FATHER is who? which is expressed in such a way that it could apply to both his or her father or even somebody or something different entirely.

All of which makes me think that at least two recent events in Maryland (both mentioned in this thread) may hint at somebody trying to tie up some loose ends:


FBI agent, estranged wife dead in apparent murder-suicide at Crownsville home


Shooting at NSA headquarters in Maryland leaves 3 hospitalized, 3 in custody

a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex
The magic square I did on the recent happy hunting post yesterday indicated both an airport and the type of warrant that will be used to arrest him.

Therefore I'm guessing the arrest option.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
Are you using a specific app or website to create your magic square?
Not familiar with it.

a reply to: abago71

Yes, the one built into Unanswered Q spreadsheet under Q links on Q Wiki. Only needs a chan post number and a number of characters to roll forward.

As I haven't yet added that post to s/sheet I copied it into one of the top empty cells (row D or below).

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Wind forward 1 character and look at right hand side 15x15 square, second row. (LHS 2nd row shows Snowden ID)

Sweet!

Josh Hawley opens antitrust suit against Google in MO. That's our state AG.

a reply to: ketsuko

Missouri here as well.

nvm

Q Wiki news

HRC leaked emails up to ID 10.000 added.


Will add:
DNC/Podesta email leaks
Vault7/8 leaks


Q Wiki is starting to be instant research tool.

Please add your work! If you dig something, save it as "ARTICLE/Title" to Wiki ... you will find hint on Main page.

Archivists, editors, coders and SKEPTICS needed! Q Wiki accepts any opinion and any content unless it is CP. No copyright or T&C worries (for now).


Add:
I'm trying to save every interesting article from this thread but it is beyond my capabilities + it is vasted of energy as I should be focused on OS/engine things and bulk data import.

Editors are in high demand!

Whoa! The same Anon who says the NYPD has the HRC video is also saying they have one with Chuck Schumer and a 14-year-old boy!

These videos better be real. If they really do have "100 dead man switches," the video is bound to surface eventually. The recent spate of articles about fake videos definitely suggests that the MSM is trying to preemptively discredit the evidence.

I read a report yesterday that says the NYPD wants to prosecute Harvey Weinstein. It's up to the NYC Attorney General now.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I think people are confusing two different issues, and the petition linked at that tweet is a great example.

As an effort to promote free access, there needs to be a seperation between cencorship at the ISP level, versus sensorhip at the interface level.

I'm for open, unrestricted access to all legal content on the internet. Theoretically, we already have this.

I'm also against forcing thse who provide access, as a business, to run their business in a certain way.

I'm a little concerned where this may end up.

Why not codify in law an equal protection clause that makes discrimination based on political affiliation illegal?

Be careful what you wish for, though, and remember that peope who vehemently disagree with common sense would be afforded equal protection.

NEW Q
#878

Mar 08 2018 08:46:32
Q !UW.yye1fxo 587467
Do you TRUST SESSIONS?
BOOM.
Q

qanonposts.com...

originally posted by: MindBodySpiritComplex
IBOR
#internetbillofrights

Italy has been mentioned but there is also Brazil to consider:

In April 2014, Web luminaries Sir Tim Berners-Lee and Vint Cerf joined over 850 academics, government officials and activists in São Paulo to attend NETmundial, Brazil’s unique Internet forum. At the opening ceremony, Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff signed into law the Marco Civil da Internet (Civil Rights Framework for the Internet), which established a groundbreaking Internet bill of rights for Latin America’s largest digital economy. 

Brazil's Internet Bill of Rights


But then of course the government changed and two years later (April 2016):

BRAZILIAN INTERNET FREEDOM activists are nervous. On Wednesday, a committee in the lower house of Congress, the Câmera dos Deputados, will vote on seven proposals ostensibly created to combat cybercrime. Critics argue the combined effect will be to substantially restrict open internet in the country by peeling back the right to anonymity, and providing law enforcement with draconian powers to censor online discourse and examine citizens’ personal data without judicial oversight.

The bills are ripped straight from what has become a standard international playbook: Propose legislation to combat cybercrime; invoke child pornography, hackers, organized crime, and even terrorism; then slip in measures that also make it easier to identify critical voices online (often without judicial oversight) and either mute them or throw them in jail for defamation — direct threats to free speech.

BRAZILIAN CYBERCRIME BILLS THREATEN OPEN INTERNET FOR 200 MILLION PEOPLE


And just two months ago (Jan 2018):

THE MOVE TO obtain new censorship authority over the internet by Brazilian police officials would be disturbing enough standing alone given Brazil’s status as the world’s fifth most populous country and second-largest in the hemisphere. But that Brazil’s announcement closely follows very similar efforts unveiled last week by French President Emmanuel Macron strongly suggests a trend in which governments are now exploiting concerns over “fake news” to justify state control over the internet.

In his New Year’s speech to journalists at the Élysée palace, the French president vowed that his new law would contain some robust transparency obligations for websites — ones for which valid arguments may be assembled. But the crux of the law is censorship: During elections, “an emergency legal action could allow authorities to remove that content or even block the website.” As in Brazil, the new French power would cover social media platforms and traditional media outlets alike, allowing the government through an as-yet-unknown process to simply remove entire political websites from the internet.

First France, Now Brazil Unveils Plan to Empower the Government to Censor the Internet in the Name of Stopping “Fake News”


ETA:

Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Alphabet and former Google chief executive, has been closely involved in the "strategic planning" of the 2016 Democratic Party presidential campaign for at least two years, emails released by whistleblowing outfit WikiLeaks suggest.

A number of emails, which were directly highlighted by the WikiLeaks Twitter account, show how Google has previously loaned a company jet to the Democratic Party for an official trip to Africa and how Schmidt himself wanted to be "head outside advisor" to any future presidential candidate.

WikiLeaks emails shows close link between Google's Eric Schmidt and the Democrats

This scares me because I fear the US is trying to do the same thing. Trump Sessions and the cyper task force are out to save the kids I believe that.

This road is a slippery slope. They put an internet bill of rights in place and later it can be changed or abused.

Also the fake news CNN etc. They want to be able to charge journos with libel. They cannot start to do that because it works both ways for both sides. As bad as CNN etc. Are they need to be allowed to speak. Cleaning up the system has to come from dismantling the control behind it not censoring the front people.

Someone mentioned the storm being about just cleaning up America and what connects to directly affect America. Q keeps repeating how this mission directly affects everyone all over the world. It is about cleaning up America but that will in turn affect all these other countries, it has to because America has been the crux of so much control in other countries. So if America cleans up and isolates itself what will happen to the whole world that has always been controlled behind the scenes by the cabal, clowns and others? A vacuum , just like someone else here said.

So cleaning up and the storm might be good and have the best intentions but what does the aftermath look like? Not leaders that lead for life, lol. How does this new found method stand the test of time? Past Trump?

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Be careful what you wish for, though, and remember that peope who vehemently disagree with common sense would be afforded equal protection.

So who will decide what is "common sense" and what is not? You?

You are sliding down a very slippery slope if you are OK with censorship of "wrongthink" - aka what is "wrongthink" according to YOU. You'll just have to hope that your own opinions won't be labeled "wrongthink" some day. It sure would suck if you were censored and silenced because the people in power had decided that you "disagree with common sense", wouldn't it.