-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

Q#830
Mar 3 2018 20:15:14
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 85cc02
544206
What I say a class action lawsuit?
When is it effective?
Who controls the narrative?
WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm?
WHO deployed the algorithm?
WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm?
SAME embed across multiple platforms.
Why?
Why is the timing relevant?
Where is @Snowden?
Why did ES leave G?
Why has NK out of the news cycle?
Define false flag?
What event(s) change the news cycle?
Why didn’t LV change the news cycle?
You have more than your know.

BOOM.
Q

In find this post interesting and CIA centered.

When is Class action effective?: Frankly never, lawyers win in all of them with crumbs going to plaintiffs - you need lawyers and by god is that a rabbit hole. But, it is effective when you know who to sue, and why, but they are never effective when you sue the wrong thing. As in, who is really in charge? Is Q saying in this post, coupled with the rest, CIA chain of command here in what follows?

WHO, World Health Organization. The "chain of command" Q alluded to earlier was a reference to the CIA controlling Pharma, mentioned directly. This indicates WHO is a CIA front too, which leads me to wonder when the AMA gets called out?

For the looking glass bridge angle "where is @snowden" would suggests their version is beyond misguided so the CIA narrative coming up this week will be wrong headed or misguided and those Q followers will see it as being off in some way.

False Flag is an event done by X but blamed on Y for X's benefit. Planned or staged event is something not blamed on another but is designed to control the energy - FL is staged.

NK out of news cycle, suggests that NK as a staged event and or false flag has again changed. NK=CIA. The olympics seemed to betray the CIA narrative with both Korea's connecting. Going back in the mirror we see the CIA a target over Q/Clock break.

a reply to: crankyoldman

That particular Q drop is very interesting and multi-leveled, I think.

As I read the drop and noticed the misspellings and grammatical oddities, I initially thought that perhaps this was not the real Q. Q had not posted in several days after a rough ride on 2/24 with security issues. But, 3 minutes later Q said the misspellings and sentence formations mattered.

This Q drop came after the young adult male shot himself near the WH. If you look at drops #830 - #832, one gets the sense that Q is trying to tell us something about WHO/WHAT/HOW regarding the controll and manipulation of the Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA).

Look at that first sentence in #830:

What I say a class action lawsuit?

Could it read, 'What Is a YA class action lawsuit?" --- What is AYA class action lawsuit? (Adolescent/Young Adult)

A few minutes later, Q talks about the young adult male that killed himself, and stated that it showed they could control 'innocents'. Who is "they", and how do they control them, and through what mechanism? GAMES?

Here is another misspelling clue:

This destabilizes certain minds to become suspectable to outside control.

sus P e C t [ a] ble
sus C e P t [ I ] ble

Notice the mirror? Then we have the hint in the 'a' and the 'i'. A+I = Artificial Intelligence.

Q always says this is not a GAME. Are our Adolescents/Young Adults being controlled through games that are not really "games"?

See...I absolutely love comments like this:

It's from Church of the Sub-genius, a parody art project poking fun at conspiracies, like Q-Anon, and using their memes freely. 

Nothing at all serious.

When I see things like that, regardless of intent, it makes my brain go...Psst! Look closer.

So I do. And it's interesting what I find where the claim is made that there is nothing to see.

This Church of the Sub genius has a Wiki, naturally. And the guy who denies founding it does as well. And on his page, I found a link which then redirected me to This VERY interesting guy:

He joined this Church, and they called him Pope Bob. Read his page. Among his influences listed is Crowley.

They always. Always. Have to tell us what they are doing. And satire is one of their very most favorite ways of hiding in plain sight.

Immediately pertinent or not, there is most definitely a connection to the bigger picture here.

a reply to: ketsuko

I agree with that as well. Loving the new background, by the way.

I think @snowden refers to snowden and ES means Eric Schmit. Former ceo of alphabet inc. I cannot seem to get the links to Q to work when I quickly look through my many bookmarks but I am (pretty sure) somewhere in the Q drops he asked why did ES go to north korea? Here's just a little opinion piece on that and other subjects:

Speaking to Google, I would ask about the secretive visit of Google Chairman Eric Schmidt to North Korea in 2013.  Then, the North Korean regime was on life watch.  Now, just four years later, North Korea has an intercontinental ballistic missile, a thermonuclear bomb, and a cyber-warfare corps.

defyccc.com...

I know, so partisan. I don't really see it all that way anymore. No matter who is doing this stuff it's evil left or right.


Here is a little play book on creating fake news to protect certain interests. Now this game is about climate change specifically. Not supporting either side but it goes to show HOW the game is played...baiting people with articles that are planted then later shown to have photoshoped pictures or incorrect facts. Just what they did with PG. As well as censoring it because "people might get hurt" when actors go into restaurants with guns or "innocent" people have their details released. Just interesting to see a case with Time magazine appearing to edit it's own cover from the 70s and also another interesting fact about snopes...they do not archive their results. Makes it easier to change it over and over as necessary.

An important figure or organization on the Left is caught doing something wrong, saying something outrageous, or blatantly lying.

The Left injects into public discourse an absolutely fake, but believable, account of this action and immediately “debunks” this account.

The fake narrative is accepted by the public as truth because the public knows that something similar has happened.  The immediate debunking is rejected as a cover-up attempt.

Later, when people accuse the original wrongdoer they use elements of the fake narrative.  This is when “fact checkers” jump on them.  Fake news networks accuse honest statesmen and commentators of spreading fake news.  The liberals’ conviction that the conservatives are stupid and uninformed gets deeper.  Google buries honest pieces far from public sight.  Facebook tries to prevent their sharing.  Leftist politicians cry that they lost elections because of fake news.

wattsupwiththat.com...


Again it says "the left" but really boths sides can play exactly the same game.

originally posted by: tigertatzen
See...I absolutely love comments like this:

It's from Church of the Sub-genius, a parody art project poking fun at conspiracies, like Q-Anon, and using their memes freely. 

Nothing at all serious.

When I see things like that, regardless of intent, it makes my brain go...Psst! Look closer.

So I do. And it's interesting what I find where the claim is made that there is nothing to see.

This Church of the Sub genius has a Wiki, naturally. And the guy who denies founding it does as well. And on his page, I found a link which then redirected me to This VERY interesting guy:

He joined this Church, and they called him Pope Bob. Read his page. Among his influences listed is Crowley.

They always. Always. Have to tell us what they are doing. And satire is one of their very most favorite ways of hiding in plain sight.

Immediately pertinent or not, there is most definitely a connection to the bigger picture here.

first, everything in your post is in italics, even your username. Strange.

Second, I've felt it for a while now but this post seals the deal, it's time for me to re-read the Illuminatus Trilogy again. It holds many clues and truths.

This whole Q saga reads like a major Discordian operation.

Edit: the "all italics, all the time" thing goes back several posts. How strange!

a reply to: tigertatzen

Yeah the comment about HRC,NK and "factories" posted under the bizare video is not wrong. In fact it's highly accurate to be just a mere coincidence. The best and most effective way to bury any conspiracy is to make it sound unbelievable and outlandish as possible. They did it to PG. They did it to LV. They did it to Seth Rich.

a reply to: crankyoldman

I think all this is starting to point in the direction of the CIA being completely corrupt and secretive enough that there hasn't been much anyone can do about it (not that anyone has wanted to). Maybe the news cycle didn't change because the CIA runs the media platforms and then pushed it aside because they were involved directly with whatever happened in LV. Just speculation on my part, obviously. Been finding more interesting stuff about the CIA in the JFK files...

Investigation of CIA involvement in plans to assassinate foreign leaders: Scroll to pg. 4 for Phase II...coincidence? (still haven't had time to read the whole thing)
catalog.archives.gov...

CIA control of firearms:
www.archives.gov...

From an earlier Q post:
www.intelligence.senate.gov...

Worth reading:
www.amazon.com...

a reply to: queenofswords

In terms of sentence formation, the line that stands out in #830 is:

SAME embed across multiple platforms.

This leads me to believe "SAME" is an acronym?

A quick search brought up the following as some of the possibilities:

1) Small And Medium enterprises (maybe ties into the deadcat bounce?),
2) SAMe = S-adenosylmethionine - Wiki says its linked to DNA/RNA regulation in humans and biosynthesis of ethylene in plants,
3) Society of American Military engineers,
4) Specific Area Message Encoding appears to be related to military/weather and wiki says its protocol used for Canadian Emergency Alert System (EAS). (Brings RAIN to mind).

Items 1 and 4 could be the most relevant from my perspective.

originally posted by: [post=23201060]tigertatzen[/post

Immediately pertinent or not, there is most definitely a connection to the bigger picture here.

Being in the art field, I've known of this internet art project since the late 70's, Tiger. Believe me, they're simply neo-Dadaist iconoclastic hippies who only enjoy mocking religion. Pure antiestablishmentarianism, imo. Their product is probably best appreciated while stoned. Sure, you can add it as an element of the conspiracy mix if you want, but then why not just lump in the whole 60's counter culture while you're at it? Mothers of Invention, Firesign Theater, Monty Python, Robert Crumb and the SF underground comic scene, etc. etc. come to mind. Btw, R. Crumb (of whom I'm a huge fan) originally promoted and published Church of the SubGenius literature during the later Haight Street heyday.

a reply to: srb2001

Is NOVA the same art group that wrote the comment and made the video?

a reply to: tjack

Second, I've felt it for a while now but this post seals the deal, it's time for me to re-read the Illuminatus Trilogy again. It holds many clues and truths.

That's funny, I was thinking the same thing. I managed to pick up the Illuminatus Trilogy and Behold a Pale Horsearound the same time and I have no I idea what led me to either one. I might as well dust off Bob Frissell's Nothing in This Book is True, But it's Exactly How Things Are while I'm at it. After 20 years passing since I read all three, who knows what I might find.

a reply to: tigertatzen

Happy St. Patric's Day ... although I am not really sure the new avatar is actually a leprechaun.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: srb2001

Is NOVA the same art group that wrote the comment and made the video?

I believe Nova Is simply a moniker for the channel. If you look at the channel's history before Q, you'll find scatological satire against all cherished icons, including Hillary and Obama. So the targets are non-partisan, if you will. Subversive art, maybe, but aimed at all American culture regardless of political affinity. This is fairly common for "edgy" art form in general.

originally posted by: srb2001

originally posted by: [post=23201060]tigertatzen[/post

Immediately pertinent or not, there is most definitely a connection to the bigger picture here.

Being in the art field, I've known of this internet art project since the late 70's, Tiger. Believe me, they're simply neo-Dadaist iconoclastic hippies who only enjoy mocking religion. Pure antiestablishmentarianism, imo. Their product is probably best appreciated while stoned. Sure, you can add it as an element of the conspiracy mix if you want, but then why not just lump in the whole 60's counter culture while you're at it? Mothers of Invention, Firesign Theater, Monty Python, Robert Crumb and the SF underground comic scene, etc. etc. come to mind. Btw, R. Crumb (of whom I'm a huge fan) originally promoted and published Church of the SubGenius literature during the later Haight Street heyday.

I hate to say it but in all of these crumbs lately and the reading on the follow up there is a whole lot that points to the CIA and mind control experiments with L s d starting the whole 60s counter culture. That and the unbelieveable connections between many musicians and the military industrial complex. Of course they cannot have controlled it all and it is plain there were many like say John Lennon who they couldn't control or control enough for their liking. "Turn on tune in drop out. " Timothy Leary.

The art world. There are a whole lot of people who say CIA created the entire "modern art " movement. I am not saying I am one of those people, I don't personally know enough. Being in that world what do you think of the possibility that CIA could be involved in the art world?

originally posted by: srb2001

originally posted by: [post=23201060]tigertatzen[/post

Immediately pertinent or not, there is most definitely a connection to the bigger picture here.

Being in the art field, I've known of this internet art project since the late 70's, Tiger. Believe me, they're simply neo-Dadaist iconoclastic hippies who only enjoy mocking religion. Pure antiestablishmentarianism, imo. Their product is probably best appreciated while stoned. Sure, you can add it as an element of the conspiracy mix if you want, but then why not just lump in the whole 60's counter culture while you're at it? Mothers of Invention, Firesign Theater, Monty Python, Robert Crumb and the SF underground comic scene, etc. etc. come to mind. Btw, R. Crumb (of whom I'm a huge fan) originally promoted and published Church of the SubGenius literature during the later Haight Street heyday.

Didn't know that about Crumb.
I remember him from when I was a little kid.
He was friends with my dad and used to come over to the house to play jazz together.
I remember he once drew an entire deck of cards for my sister and I.

If only I still had those.

Huh ... sorry was chasing some tails ...

Isn't it interesting that Jim Jones' People's Temple set up in a former Scottish Rite Temple?

Is there anything the FBI and CIA don't have their mitts on?

A second argument put forward in these pages is that Jones instigated the massacre because he feared that Congressman Leo Ryan’s investigation would disgrace him. Specifically, Jones appears to have been terrified that Ryan and the press would uncover information that the leftist founder of the Peoples Temple was for many years a witting stooge, or agent, of the FBI and the CIA. This concern was, I believe, mirrored in various precincts of the U.S. intelligence community, where it was feared that Ryan’s investigation would embarrass the CIA by linking Jones to some of the Agency’s most volatile programs and operations.

This may be why the cult-leader’s 201-file was purged by the CIA immediately after Jones’s friend, and suspected case-officer, Dan Mitrione, died.[1] And it may also be why Congressman Ryan’s contingent was escorted to Jonestown by the CIA’s undercover chief-of-station in Guyana, Richard Dwyer.[2]

originally posted by: ketsuko
Huh ... sorry was chasing some tails ...

Isn't it interesting that Jim Jones' People's Temple set up in a former Scottish Rite Temple?

Is there anything the FBI and CIA don't have their mitts on?

A second argument put forward in these pages is that Jones instigated the massacre because he feared that Congressman Leo Ryan’s investigation would disgrace him. Specifically, Jones appears to have been terrified that Ryan and the press would uncover information that the leftist founder of the Peoples Temple was for many years a witting stooge, or agent, of the FBI and the CIA. This concern was, I believe, mirrored in various precincts of the U.S. intelligence community, where it was feared that Ryan’s investigation would embarrass the CIA by linking Jones to some of the Agency’s most volatile programs and operations.

This may be why the cult-leader’s 201-file was purged by the CIA immediately after Jones’s friend, and suspected case-officer, Dan Mitrione, died.[1] And it may also be why Congressman Ryan’s contingent was escorted to Jonestown by the CIA’s undercover chief-of-station in Guyana, Richard Dwyer.[2]

The CIA did the killing entirely. That was a CIA program and they murdered everyone there with syringes and guns. Jones was a patsy. It was truly a horrible event.

a reply to: srb2001

Interesting. Thanks for the reply.

a reply to: crankyoldman

... and what did they learn? What are they using from that experience today?