-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

a reply to: IAMTAT

Different tax status for charities? I.E. this method stops Soros losing X% moving his money around?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thanks, J&C.
Added.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Maybe this? Too much to quote but maybe pertinent to the question.

Law Enforcement and National Security

One little snippet, but the whole article is interesting I think.

Finally, the Court in Quirin readily rejected Haupt's claim of constitutional rights by virtue of his purported U.S. citizenship. U.S. citizenship, the Court held, "does not relieve him from the consequences of a belligerency which is unlawful because in violation of the law of war." [23] By virtue of his allegiance to a foreign enemy and his taking up arms on behalf of that enemy, therefore, Haupt was subject to military punishment, rather than criminal justice.

I've learned so much (NEW Stuff)...just going back over these first two Q posts with you all.
Very effective...at least for me.
TY

a reply to: IAMTAT could RC be a registered charity. The official reason seems to be that Soros had a December 2017 deadline to bring back offshore profits that he had deferred paying taxes on. His tax bill would have been into the billions
even made a thread about it a long while back

a reply to: IAMTAT

In UK RC stands for Registered Charity.

Isn't the OSF a charity (a.k.a. slush fund ;-) )?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Interesting enough it is referred to as a registered charity in the UK Australia and Canada but not in the United States

a reply to: dashen

Thanks.
Already added Registered Charity.
FYI there IS an answers section (lower right corner of post) on some of the earlier posts HERE:
qanonmap.github.io...

However, coming to them 'blind' felt much more productive and produced excellent new results.

a reply to: dashen
It could be interesting to identify the difference in requirements for a Registered Charity in U.S.

a reply to: IAMTAT

But did you add a 7 billion dollar tax deferment scam as an answer to why he stuck his cash into a charity?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

it appears the common denominator to be accredited as a charity is that you have to provide funding or donations in advancements in certain Fields such as education helping the poor furthering religion or unburdening the government in assisting the citizenry to name a few

a reply to: IAMTAT

The existing Answers sections DO help point us to Questions not yet answered!

Useful for Triage of what to investigate next.

a reply to: dashen

DONE.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: IAMTAT

The existing Answers sections DO help point us to Questions not yet answered!

Useful for Triage of what to investigate next.

ABSOLUTELY.
At least for Q's earlier posts.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
I've learned so much (NEW Stuff)...just going back over these first two Q posts with you all.
Very effective...at least for me.
TY

YES INDEED.. Big thank-you to all contributors. Still soaking it in and (finally) building a the picture that Q suggested we build.

I posted yesterday that Q could have stepped away for awhile, just so everyone could regroup and get in the right frame of mind for the big take-down mission. (Prepare for battle)

a reply to: dashen

I was thinking more "What is different in US RC definition that meant OSF did NOT qualify as one?"

I may be getting the wrong end of the stick.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

What I meant to say is there's no designation of registered charity in US tax law as far as I can tell.
You have to either be registered as a 501 c 3 charitable organization or as a charitable Trust. There are also other legal organizations that can be used to dispense charity and collect money.

here's a list and breakdown by country of different types of nonprofits around the world

Anyone interested in collecting a list of currently UNANSWERED/UNSETTLED Q questions from posts?
Finding the answer to ONE, may lead to solving ALL.

"Where We Go ONE, We Go ALL."

a reply to: IAMTAT Possibly Barenblatt vs USA I am reading it now hopefully someone better versed in law can comment but it is certainly an interesting read barenblatt case

Hmmm.... rounding up all these folks would make REX 84 seem like a legitimate thing, except instead of rounding up innocent citizenry, they'll be rounding up treasonous dogs. That makes the whole red blue thing make a little more sense, depending on which party these dogs were taking cover under.

Smells like the movie Winter Soldier was onto something.... maybe we should refer to the deep state as Hydra.