It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: UKTruth
Kleenex stocks continue to be on the rise.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
Oh I know what you and Trump are telling yourselves to justify a lack of transparency, and that is what makes me weep more. Well, you not so much, I really don't care what you think since you aren't American.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
I don't care what he put in the memo. If Nunes' partisan hit job of a memo was good enough for release then the Democratic response sure as # is. If you want to discuss classified # that shouldn't be released, too bad. That ship sailed with Nunes' memo being released. Now it just appears to be a double standard Trump is setting on this memo.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: UKTruth
Kleenex stocks continue to be on the rise.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
Whatever. I'm not under any illusions that you'll ever side against Trump. Transparency be DAMNED. Trump said so so that's all the reasoning you need. Releasing partisan hit job memos that unfairly put the FBI on the defensive by making spurious and no evidence claims is a-ok, but releasing a rebuttal memo to help even the waters of discussion is somehow not fair. Psh. Typical.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
Whatever. I'm not under any illusions that you'll ever side against Trump. Transparency be DAMNED. Trump said so so that's all the reasoning you need. Releasing partisan hit job memos that unfairly put the FBI on the defensive by making spurious and no evidence claims is a-ok, but releasing a rebuttal memo to help even the waters of discussion is somehow not fair. Psh. Typical.
I've already been on the opposing side to some of the thigs Trump has done.
It's not about taking sides. You are, though by saying; Republicans released a memo so Democrats should be able to as well. Do you realise how partisan that thought process is?
Each memo/release of information has to be judged on it's own merits. We've been told that he Democrat memo reveals sources and methods. It is going back to the House Intel committee to be adjusted. That is fair. Nothing dangerous to US national security was in the Republican memo.
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Yes, we were told that about the Nunes memo, and nothing was in it that matched the claims. It was fine.
In truth, Schiff is being accommodated when he should not be. There is no Nunes memo - its the House Intel Committee memo of which Schiff is a part. Because he doesn't like playing by the rules, he wants his own memo.
and said his recusal — which applies only to the committee’s Russia investigation — would be in effect while the committee looks into the matter.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Yes, we were told that about the Nunes memo, and nothing was in it that matched the claims. It was fine.
So why do you believe the claims about Schiff's memo?
In truth, Schiff is being accommodated when he should not be. There is no Nunes memo - its the House Intel Committee memo of which Schiff is a part. Because he doesn't like playing by the rules, he wants his own memo.
Oh PLEASE! Don't even pretend to believe that memo was written between a united front of all parties on the House Intel Committee. If anything Nunes should be censured for having released that memo. He already recused himself from the investigation earlier for clearly being partisan biased for Trump.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: shooterbrody
He is recused.