It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Editor's Note: This article was originally posted on Forbes.com on Feb. 5th, 2018 at 11:36 AM (local time) but taken down shortly afterward for unknown reasons. We were able to recover all five pages from Google cache. Original URL (of first page; replace the "1" at the end with 2, 3, 4, 5 to see other pages):
Author: Thomas Del Beccaro
There can be no question, at this point, that certain higher ups in the FBI and the DOJ did not want Hillary to be indicted and did not want Donald Trump to become President. Those efforts were not entirely independent of each other.
Below is a timeline of events – abbreviated though it is – that makes it rather plain that the FBI and DOJ were not investigating potential crimes objectively.
Indeed, they were committing crimes during the process in aid of their preferred outcomes.
1. 2007. Hillary Clinton wanted to be President. Hillary’s ambitions to be president started long ago. She ran for President in the 2008 cycle. In 2009, after losing to Obama, Hillary became Obama’s Secretary of State. She stayed in that post until 2013.
2. March 2015. The Hillary email scandal breaks. Hillary was using an unapproved/unsecured server and devices to communicate. She was using a private email account. Classified information was being sent through that email, server and devices – including when Hillary was abroad.
All of that is illegal. As 2015 unfolds, it becomes clear to the FBI and the DOJ that President Barack Obama was communicating with Hillary using her non-state department email. Obama was using an email and a name that masked who he was.
That had to be known to authorities long before March of 2015 given that it occurred prior to 2013.
As Andrew McCarthy points out in his recent article, there was no chance that the DOJ was going to indict Hillary because that would have required implicating President Obama. That was never going to happen. From thereafter, DOJ officials acted with that understanding, however illegal, in mind.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: GuidedKill
So why take it down?
To mess with people's minds.
only to take it down so NO ONE READS IT....
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: GuidedKill
only to take it down so NO ONE READS IT....
Yet here you are reading the article and linking to forbes giving them ad revenue.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: GuidedKill
So why take it down?
To mess with people's minds.
So that's how forbes makes money? Paying employees to investigate, confirm, write, proof read, edit, proof read, type, publish....only to take it down so NO ONE READS IT....
Great business model..yea right. Something else is at play here.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: GuidedKill
So why take it down?
To mess with people's minds.
So that's how forbes makes money? Paying employees to investigate, confirm, write, proof read, edit, proof read, type, publish....only to take it down so NO ONE READS IT....
Great business model..yea right. Something else is at play here.
Maybe that is how they make money.
Are there any wealthy folks out there that might have paid to have that article pulled?
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: underwerks
Well, show us which part has been proven false.
I'll wait....