It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
At the rate new info is arriving, the lies in the Democrat's SCHIFF MEMO will be glaringly obvious when it's released later today.
I spent the evening looking through the text archive, again, and I think they we've been had. Whatever system the FBI has in place to *capture* texts, it's a failure.
That, or someone has picked through them and deleted some texts.
Here's one example I found...notice the "B)" in the text with the timestamp 12:37:16, on 9/10/2016?:
Where's "A)?"
Going back to the archive from Strzok's phone...that day hasn't been captured, at all:
In fact, eight days of texts during that period of time are missing.
***
And that's not the only time I noticed odd gaps in the conversation.
So, what good are these texts? Anything incriminating has long been deleted and we've been given an edited archive.
Useless batch of crap.
originally posted by: burntheships
He was mentioned as having something to do with the altered 302's
and that they were withheld from Congress.
302’s are FBI forms used to document interviews/interrogations.
They detail answers to questions given as well as who was present
during the interview.
"It's 'trust, but verify' is how it works," Chaffetz told FBI acting legislative affairs chief Jason Herring. "You don't get to decide what I get to see. I get to see it all."
After Herring said he could not promise to deliver all the investigative summaries—known as 302s—in an unedited form, Chaffetz sent the subpoena down from the dais to the witness table where the FBI official sat with colleagues from six other agencies.
"I've signed this subpoena. We want all the 302s....and you are hereby served," Chaffetz said.
The chairman also complained that the FBI was trying to decide for itself what was relevant to the committee's probe.
"That’s the way a banana republic acts, not the way the United States of America acts," he said. "I don’t expect to have to issue a subpoena to see unclassified information."
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: carewemust
At the rate new info is arriving, the lies in the Democrat's SCHIFF MEMO will be glaringly obvious when it's released later today.
The "redacted" stuff will place the credibilities of many into Question 🔮
😳🤧
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I really think the gig is up. Something is dawning on me here,
none of these people are moving to any Government jobs.
Either retiring, or going public sector.
This is starting to look like the real deal!
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: KansasGirl
ETA:
Comey was fired. So I don't think he had an opportunity to do
much else, hence a teaching position and a book.
One guy went to CNN, and Brand is going to WALMART.
But still, I agree there needs to be consequences,
if they did something illegal, indictment and no pension.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burntheships
Strozk wasn't demoted.
Lie # one.
I'll be back with more.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
Hers to hoping our constitution and the rule of law really does apply to everyone, no matter how high they reside in our public institutions.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Martin75
I like Silly. I think she provides a valuable counterpoint to what would otherwise be an echo chamber.
While I disagree with her so often, due to the rarity of the viewpoint she represents here (despite being rather widespread in the real world), i value her input on ATS quite highly.
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: KansasGirl
If these people really did what it looks like they did/some are speculating they did, and they get DEALS and get to just walk away, we should be PISSED.
Oh, they did.
As the meeting broke up, George Z. Toscas, a national security prosecutor, ribbed Mr. Comey. “I guess you’re the Federal Bureau of Matters now,” Mr. Toscas said, according to two people who were there.
www.nytimes.com...
At the time that might have been somewhat inside joke.
But here we are now....
,Strzok text reveals that the DOJ was forced to tell Congress about the Weiner laptop
emails only because George Toscas at the DOJ found out about them.
We already knew that Comey sat on the messages and lied under oath about this matter. But now we have proof that these clowns would have hidden this evidence had it not been for their inability to hide the evidence from George Toscas. Why hide the info from Toscas?
In 2011 George Z. Toscas worked as deputy assistant attorney general for counterterrorism and counterespionage in the Justice Department’s National Security Division. In 2016 Toscas worked as a General Attorney at the Offices, Boards and Divisions in Washington, District Of Columbia.
When Comey capitulated to fellow criminal partner Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and referred to the investigation into Clinton’s email server as a “matter” instead of an investigation, Toscas was not happy.
theblacksphere.net...
I am just hoping there are some agents out there that are super mad too,
and will turn states evidence on the entire thing.