It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude
the Steele Dosier (which I believe you still think has validity)
Which I know has validity and so does everybody else except his base. Most of it has been validated. So sorry. You can call it fake if you like but it's not going to change the fact that it's not.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude
the Steele Dosier (which I believe you still think has validity)
Which I know has validity and so does everybody else except his base. Most of it has been validated. So sorry. You can call it fake if you like but it's not going to change the fact that it's not.
But I never saw you speak ill of Hillary's emails or connections to uranium one
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CriticalStinker
But I never saw you speak ill of Hillary's emails or connections to uranium one
And you won't here me chime in on stupid conspiracies. Hillary was not charged with anything and careless isn't a crime now or ever. U1 is a joke. You should let it go. As an argument it doesn't hold water.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy
What kind of info on trump could they get if, as trump insists, he wasn't really part of the campaign in the first place and was officially off the campaign when they got the warrant?
Where is your disconnect occurring on this?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CriticalStinker
But I never saw you speak ill of Hillary's emails or connections to uranium one
And you won't here me chime in on stupid conspiracies. Hillary was not charged with anything and careless isn't a crime now or ever. U1 is a joke. You should let it go. As an argument it doesn't hold water.
originally posted by: Grambler
Well if you followed the news, yesterday the infomant on the Uranium One scandal, Douglas Campbell, testified to congress about what he saw going on with russia in their efforts to buy Uranium.
Bacially he says that these russians, a couple which have actually been charged with crimes related to bribing, were actually bribing hillary and Obama connected people. In fact he goes on to say that he gave the FBI info that russia was helping iran with their nuclear program as well.
Now keep in mind, Campbell had worked for the CIA or FBI for decades.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude
Too hard to understand? What is wrong with you? There is no proof they spied on trump now or ever. They have already made that announcment. You're gonna keep stumbling over this fact . They did not spy on trump. They did not wire tap him. Trumps own appointed IC has already determined that. So don't use it as an argument anymore because it's a flat out lie.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude
the Steele Dosier (which I believe you still think has validity)
Which I know has validity and so does everybody else except his base. Most of it has been validated. So sorry. You can call it fake if you like but it's not going to change the fact that it's not.
I have yet to see a point by point breakdown of what was verified as opposed to what wasn't...can you provide that? I mean you must have seen one since you "know" its been mostly verified and credible.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude
the Steele Dosier (which I believe you still think has validity)
Which I know has validity and so does everybody else except his base. Most of it has been validated. So sorry. You can call it fake if you like but it's not going to change the fact that it's not.
originally posted by: SRPrime
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude
the Steele Dosier (which I believe you still think has validity)
Which I know has validity and so does everybody else except his base. Most of it has been validated. So sorry. You can call it fake if you like but it's not going to change the fact that it's not.
What; I'm not part of his base and haven't seen one claim in it "validated." Please show me what parts have been validated, and how.
I've seen you say this before; I've seen you proven wrong, and I've also seen you fail to provide any sort of information that could even insinuate something was "validated."
Stop repeating non-sense; if it's validated, post it. The problem is, it's not, nothing in it is, and not even the left or the DNC is claiming it's valid at this point.