It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

So now there is no credibility that Russia hacked our election. AT ALL. NONE.

page: 1
66
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+42 more 
posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 12:09 AM
link   
What's the difference between the Steele dossier and the "hacked" DNC server?

Nothing.

The DNC conveniently REFUSED to turn over the hacked server to the FBI for the FBI to investigate, instead, they gave it to CrowdStrike a Democrat linked company to examine. CrowdStrike declared that Russia hacked the server, a few more "independent companies" confirmed it and guess what.

THE FBI TOOK THE DNC'S WORD AS FACT.

So where the hell is the evidence of Russian hacking in our election? What has the FBI actually examined themselves?

NOTHING, THEY TOOK THE DNC's WORD.

Well watch this, Crowdstrike will end the Russian collusion narrative once and for all.




posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 12:15 AM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

I thought it was established that the Clinton crew plus whoever else were responsible for lying about the Russian hack thing?


+23 more 
posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 12:16 AM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

The word of known liars is enough for the FBI nowadays, apparently.


+12 more 
posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 12:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: xstealth

The word of known liars is enough for the FBI nowadays, apparently.


Only if they're Democrats.


+18 more 
posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 12:22 AM
link   
Amazing.All this corruption and the dems still couldn't steal the election.
And now people are seeing"What REALLY Happened"



posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 12:27 AM
link   
a reply to: xstealth


Who hacked the DNC to get those e-mails to Wiki-leaks?



posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 12:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: xstealth
What's the difference between the Steele dossier and the "hacked" DNC server?

Nothing.

The DNC conveniently REFUSED to turn over the hacked server to the FBI for the FBI to investigate, instead, they gave it to CrowdStrike a Democrat linked company to examine. CrowdStrike declared that Russia hacked the server, a few more "independent companies" confirmed it and guess what.

THE FBI TOOK THE DNC'S WORD AS FACT.

So where the hell is the evidence of Russian hacking in our election? What has the FBI actually examined themselves?

NOTHING, THEY TOOK THE DNC's WORD.

Well watch this, Crowdstrike will end the Russian collusion narrative once and for all.



The difference is one was used to sway the election(emails! dont forget all the EMAILS!) and the other was not.


+7 more 
posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 12:39 AM
link   


Who hacked the DNC to get those e-mails to Wiki-leaks?


Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory

DNC Email leak Responsibility


edit on 7-2-2018 by Infoshill because: (no reason given)


+5 more 
posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 12:41 AM
link   
a reply to: xstealth


So now there is no credibility that Russia hacked our election. AT ALL. NONE.

In reality there never was any credibility.

Just a sideshow on the part of the DNC the Clintons and the FBI.

More later on CNN if you're interested.


+8 more 
posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 01:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xstealth


Who hacked the DNC to get those e-mails to Wiki-leaks?



There is more evidence that Seth Rich leaked them than there is Russia hacked them.

Is the FBI in the habit of confiscating laptops from victims killed in botched robbery attempts?

Idk, you tell me if that's normal operations.
edit on 7/2/18 by xstealth because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 01:46 AM
link   
She was "right" afterall !!

'There will be conseQuences' Wasserman Schultz to Police Chief

👸😆👸




posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 01:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xstealth


Who hacked the DNC to get those e-mails to Wiki-leaks?



Maybe the Awan Family gave Rich the goods but that all led to a ⚰ "coffin fit" ⚰

😱




posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 01:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: Diisenchanted
In reality there never was any credibility.

Just a sideshow on the part of the DNC the Clintons and the FBI.

More later on CNN if you're interested.



All of it reminds me of the famous tape that supposedly cause Benghazi, damn they are good at misdirection...



posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 03:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Diisenchanted
In reality there never was any credibility.

Just a sideshow on the part of the DNC the Clintons and the FBI.

More later on CNN if you're interested.



All of it reminds me of the famous tape that supposedly cause Benghazi, damn they are good at misdirection...






I'm not so sure they are good at misdirection, the base they are pandering too simply isn't able to discern fact from fiction, or more to the point care to.



posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 05:21 AM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

Yup. Russia hysteria hides the fact that leaks came from wiki leaks.

Wiki leaks got them from Seth Rich.

Seth Rich is dead now.

Russia hysteria conveniently took pressure off the DNC and Clinton for obvious politically motivated assassination of DNC whistle blower.

Lets get back to that if this whole Russia hacking lie is known for the sham it is.



posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 07:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xstealth


Who hacked the DNC to get those e-mails to Wiki-leaks?



Their password was literally "password." It could have been anyone. Might it also be possible they somehow managed to have a single ethical mind in their ranks who would do it



posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 07:30 AM
link   
see....you are so wrong on your assertions, due to so much publicly available information, that nobody gives a damn to explain it to you....



posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 09:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: BotheLumberJack
a reply to: xstealth

I thought it was established that the Clinton crew plus whoever else were responsible for lying about the Russian hack thing?


I recall Hillary pushing the war with Russia thing pretty hard on the campaign trail...anyone else remember that?? A Hillary presidency, at that point, was a guarantee that we were going to war with Russia.

Trump got elected and !!POOF!! that narrative was G-O-N-E...

(Thank God.)
So then the Democrats pushed a baseless collusion and tampering campaign against President Trump because, you know... !IT HAD TO BE! because they couldn't believe they lost. They had nothing left, so they ran with it.




edit on E28America/ChicagoWed, 07 Feb 2018 09:17:15 -06002amWednesdayth09am by EternalShadow because: add



posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 09:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: xstealth
What's the difference between the Steele dossier and the "hacked" DNC server?

Nothing.

The DNC conveniently REFUSED to turn over the hacked server to the FBI for the FBI to investigate, instead, they gave it to CrowdStrike a Democrat linked company to examine. CrowdStrike declared that Russia hacked the server, a few more "independent companies" confirmed it and guess what.

THE FBI TOOK THE DNC'S WORD AS FACT.

So where the hell is the evidence of Russian hacking in our election? What has the FBI actually examined themselves?

NOTHING, THEY TOOK THE DNC's WORD.

Well watch this, Crowdstrike will end the Russian collusion narrative once and for all.


Ugh

Youre so frustrating

It makes sense if you actually THINK about it. Why would you hand it over to the FBI? The emails and content on the server are private.. not only that but its possible they could contain other things they have legal implications against the owners of the server or private information they wouldnt want leaked about people (innocent things.. but things that need to remain private). If they give it to the FBI to look at the FBI has an obligation to take action on other things they find. If they use a.third party they trust to investigate it.... its much more likely whats private will remain private.


+11 more 
posted on Feb, 7 2018 @ 09:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lucidparadox

originally posted by: xstealth
What's the difference between the Steele dossier and the "hacked" DNC server?

Nothing.

The DNC conveniently REFUSED to turn over the hacked server to the FBI for the FBI to investigate, instead, they gave it to CrowdStrike a Democrat linked company to examine. CrowdStrike declared that Russia hacked the server, a few more "independent companies" confirmed it and guess what.

THE FBI TOOK THE DNC'S WORD AS FACT.

So where the hell is the evidence of Russian hacking in our election? What has the FBI actually examined themselves?

NOTHING, THEY TOOK THE DNC's WORD.

Well watch this, Crowdstrike will end the Russian collusion narrative once and for all.


Ugh

Youre so frustrating

It makes sense if you actually THINK about it. Why would you hand it over to the FBI? The emails and content on the server are private.. not only that but its possible they could contain other things they have legal implications against the owners of the server or private information they wouldnt want leaked about people (innocent things.. but things that need to remain private). If they give it to the FBI to look at the FBI has an obligation to take action on other things they find. If they use a.third party they trust to investigate it.... its much more likely whats private will remain private.


So what your saying is the private interests of the DNC and Podesta were more important than solving russian interference.

yet at the same time, these dems wanted a special prosecutor to look onto trump, and all of his financials and private emails etc.

Absolute hypocrite garbage.




top topics



 
66
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join