It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nunes: Fine, the FBI Didn’t Lie, But Its Font Was Too Small

page: 3
29
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: luthier

You do understand that in march of 16 trump had not even won the gop nomination?
You are the one attempting to conflate a gop nomination campaign meeting with a "national security meeting".

nice try
try harder


The literal headline from Trumo's campaign headline on his Web page was "national security meeting"

The point is he obviously met the man and Nunes is a proven liar just like Adam schiff..

His words are about as credible.





edit on 6-2-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:35 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian




Yea, details matter.

details do matter
what "national security" meeting was trump holding in march of 16?
none
he was not even the gop nom

what is humorous is we have gone from "trump lies about being wiretapped", to well there were fisa warrants, to well the fisa warrant was issued on someone who already had a warrant(paige who may have been WORKING FOR THE FBI), to we didnt use the dossier to get the warrant, to well we only used part of the dossier to get the warrant

the truth is going to be revealed
why did rogers make that trip to speak with president elect trump in nov of 16?



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:37 AM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Don't move the goal posts. The info was provided. They said it wasnt.
That was a lie.
Period end of report.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Southern Guardian

I'm a bit confused. Are you saying the warrant for Page wasn't for the purpose of gathering Intel?

Then why was the dossier paid for by the Clinton Foundation and DNC?



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:39 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Do you know that campaigns strategize about national security policy before going into office?

No?

Or just flailing around.
edit on 6-2-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:42 AM
link   
a reply to: luthier




The point is he obviously met the man and Nunes is a proven liar just like Adam schiff.. His words are about as credible.

And are yours after repeating what was given to you with no discernment on your part.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:42 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Source of which? That Nunes said trump never met Papadopolis? Or proof that trump did meet him?
Trump funny enough announced both him and Carter Page as his top foreign advisors and there's a photo of trump sitting at a conference table with the man.

Photo and story:
www.vox.com...

Guess this is me not providing sources again huh bubba?



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: shooterbrody

Do you know that campaigns strategize about national security policy before going into office?

No?

Or just flailing around.

lol
try as hard as you like, that was not what you represented
a campaign meeting is not a "national security" meeting
you are ridiculous attempting to hold others to standards you clearly cant meet



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: luthier




The point is he obviously met the man and Nunes is a proven liar just like Adam schiff.. His words are about as credible.

And are yours after repeating what was given to you with no discernment on your part.




Right.

So you have no rebuttal you are just flailing around trying to find one and the ad hom was all you could grab..



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: shooterbrody

Do you know that campaigns strategize about national security policy before going into office?

No?

Or just flailing around.

lol
try as hard as you like, that was not what you represented
a campaign meeting is not a "national security" meeting
you are ridiculous attempting to hold others to standards you clearly cant meet


Read the headline buddy. It's strait from the trump campaign.

Or not. Keep up the lapdog argument.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme
Funny you hop in


That Nunes said trump never met Papadopolis?

You missed a bit from Nunes quote.
Shall I add it here for you?



As far as we can tell

Interesting you left that bit out. Not really important at all is it?
Who is the we?
You obviously know so much about the subject please enlighten us?



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:51 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




ok 
this proves what? 

It proves Nunes is a liar who manipulates information. That picture has been all over the place since Papadopolis' indictment was publicized last October along with Manaforts.
It's been on every news channel . For Nunes to fall back on the "he was just the coffee boy" schtick prooves that he's trying to steer this in favor of trump.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:52 AM
link   
a reply to: luthier




The man outright lied. Now the head of Intel department doesn't know he was in a meeting about national security.

Your quote.
Good luck trying to parse it now.
And you are on about honesty
what a joke



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody




ok 
this proves what? 

It proves Nunes is a liar who manipulates information. That picture has been all over the place since Papadopolis' indictment was publicized last October along with Manaforts.
It's been on every news channel . For Nunes to fall back on the "he was just the coffee boy" schtick prooves that he's trying to steer this in favor of trump.


You misread nunes quote
or intentionally misrepresented it
"As far as we can tell" was in your souce documentation was it not?
You wouldnt intentionally misrepresent what nunes said would you?



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:55 AM
link   
In all seriousness, I'm honestly starting to think that ``theantediluvian`` and ``Southern Guardian`` work for the Kremlin.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Meldionne1

It appears he didn't read any of it. Had his friend read it and wrote his book report from his friends crib notes.
And now his friend is throwing his hands in the air saying no dude that's not what I told you.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Southern Guardian



we have lots of time for all this to get sorted out. Should be an interesting ride for you.


If the memo and Nunes's penchant for grandiose claims are any indication, you're in for a long period of getting your hopes up, followed by a lot of disappointment and then years of you feeling like somebody got away with something.


could very well be, but as I said before, this isn't up to us. I'm just glad it's out of the conspiracy realm, and into the limelight.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 08:59 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

❓❕

Are you saying the photo is a lie?



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 09:03 AM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Nope. Gateway pundit?

No .
Everything they publish is proven to be a lie.

Find a more credible source or don't bother including the info.
They cannot be trusted.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 09:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

❓❕

Are you saying the photo is a lie?

Did you INTENTIONALLY misrepresent nunes quote?




top topics



 
29
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join