Intelligence Committee approves release of Dems’ rebuttal to FISA memo

originally posted by: mkultra11

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: face23785

Exactly, and their lapdogs will eat it up. Even if a sentence reads "the source of this highly sensitive intel was [redacted]" they'll claim that wasn't redacted to protect a source but it was redacted because Trump is hiding something, and the devout collusion believers will take that as fact.

Anything Trump redacts will be exposed by the media using their leaked version. Trump is screwed.

Ive heard that before. It was unanimously voted to be released to the public in unredacted format. Then the FBI will look over it and see that it gives away sources and methods, unlike the Nunes memo, and it will have to be redacted. They'll try to spin it against Trump, but it will backfire because it will show that democrats have no regard for the law and will sacrifice national security for political purposes. Which is exactly what this is about.

Nunes started the ball rolling. He has no business on that committee. Meanwhile, the GOP is circling the wagons around a corrupt fool who is being played by Russia.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: face23785

Exactly, and their lapdogs will eat it up. Even if a sentence reads "the source of this highly sensitive intel was [redacted]" they'll claim that wasn't redacted to protect a source but it was redacted because Trump is hiding something, and the devout collusion believers will take that as fact.

Anything Trump redacts will be exposed by the media using their leaked version. Trump is screwed.

Except when the redactions are all for legit intelligence purposes, then the media will conveniently forget they have an unredacted version and just go with the "those redactions are for political reasons, Adam Schiff said so" narrative.

originally posted by: mkultra11

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: face23785

Exactly, and their lapdogs will eat it up. Even if a sentence reads "the source of this highly sensitive intel was [redacted]" they'll claim that wasn't redacted to protect a source but it was redacted because Trump is hiding something, and the devout collusion believers will take that as fact.

Anything Trump redacts will be exposed by the media using their leaked version. Trump is screwed.

Ive heard that before. It was unanimously voted to be released to the public in unredacted format. Then the FBI will look over it and see that it gives away sources and methods, unlike the Nunes memo, and it will have to be redacted. They'll try to spin it against Trump, but it will backfire because it will show that democrats have no regard for the law and will sacrifice national security for political purposes. Which is exactly what this is about.

Their base will eat it up. Apolitical folks will see exactly what you detailed here. They keep making the same mistake, just catering to their base. That doesn't play well with independents and moderates.

originally posted by: DJW001
Meanwhile, the GOP is circling the wagons around a corrupt fool who is being played by Russia.

The Republicans are not circling the wagons around Obama, Clinton or the other democrats who cant accept the fact they lost even after rigging a primary election, trying to use foreigners to interfere in a presidential election and wasting 1.2 billion on Clinton.

Given the DNC has 400k dollars cash on hand good luck with that blue wave.

a reply to: mkultra11

I’m sorry you lost me lol..

I have no idea which direction you mean that..

a reply to: Xcathdra

They didn’t rig the primary any more than it ever is..

Superdelegates get to vote whatever way they like.. that is an institutional feature in both parties..

Garbage?? Maybe..

Unique to this election??

BWAHAHAHA

Thiz is always my major problem with the rightwing propaganda narrative..

It is not that the system is screwd..

Noooo..

It is that the leftist agenda is out to get the gop..

a reply to: carewemust

Another words..

He doesn’t agree with you and constantly debunks right wing propaganda, so he is inherently the enemy and must be destroyed..

a reply to: mkultra11

Except no one has ever been able to provide anything more than speculation and crazy satanic pedophile conspiracy theories to prove that corruption...

So what reality is proving otherwise??

Is it the laundry list of fbi investigations ??


Nope, none of them...


Maybe it is the list of criminal charges??

Nope none of them..


I assume hillary is corrupt, just because she is a politician, but I have yet to see anything even remotely confirmed that says she is uniquely corrupt...

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Tell that to the Federal judge who reinstated the lawsuit against the DNC for fraud.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Tell that to the Federal judge who reinstated the lawsuit against the DNC for fraud.

BWAHAHAHA

LAWSUIT!!

Not criminal charges...



Anyone can sue for Any reason.. you could be the one sueing them lol

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: face23785

Exactly, and their lapdogs will eat it up. Even if a sentence reads "the source of this highly sensitive intel was [redacted]" they'll claim that wasn't redacted to protect a source but it was redacted because Trump is hiding something, and the devout collusion believers will take that as fact.

Anything Trump redacts will be exposed by the media using their leaked version. Trump is screwed.

Except when the redactions are all for legit intelligence purposes, then the media will conveniently forget they have an unredacted version and just go with the "those redactions are for political reasons, Adam Schiff said so" narrative.

You do not seem to understand the situation. The FISA court will declassify and redact the warrants in order to defend their integrity from the smear attacks of Trump and his colluders. Nunes' lies will be exposed for the sake of national security.

a reply to: DJW001

Are you sure it is not a vast global illuminati conspiracy where all the scientists, unions, celebrities, college professors, intellectuals and media are purposefully lying to discredit the gop and male Christianity look bad, FOR OBAMA?!?!!


I mean I know the logistics required to pull that off are literally impossible to imagaine, so I assume that is where satanic cults and interdiminsional child rapists come in?!!!


Or have I been watching too much Sean hannity??

Lmao

a reply to: JoshuaCox

They didn’t rig the primary any more than it ever is.. 

That's certainly possible. This might just be the first time they documented how they handed the states' fundraising efforts and veto over PR responses to one of the candidates in exchange for cash to keep the wheels spinning...

Superdelegates get to vote whatever way they like.. that is an institutional feature in both parties.. 

Actually, no. The GOP provides for 3 delegates from each state who sit atop the party, but they are bound by rule to the state primary vote.
Democrats have a large number of unpledged delegates who can vote for whomever they please to stop grassroots efforts from making headway.

So your statement isn't true.