It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Narrative-shattering revelation: Clinton campaign fed information to Chris Steele!

page: 2
26
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 5 2018 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: bmullini

I saw that. Unreal. Makes me wonder how many other trumped up (pun intended) warrants they got on other unsuspecting citizens.




posted on Feb, 5 2018 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns




He is saying that you or I, as private citizens, can compile whatever information we'd like on individuals we personally hate (like Hillary) and that everybody should take us seriously.


Yah, those are called lawsuits or even allegations. They happen everyday all over the country. You can certainly bring any grievance you have to court and the other party would need to defend themselves. The court will take you seriously, but it is still your burden of proof.



posted on Feb, 5 2018 @ 02:33 PM
link   
So let me see if this is correct:

What is being stated is that those on Hillaries campaign were feeding Steele information about Trump, that was being funding in part by Hillaries team.

So what is being stated is that members of Hillary Clinton's team were flying to Eastern Europe and Russia and finding out where Steele was, and then giving him information either directly or via a second source so he can send it back to Fusion, to be compiled into a report, to give to Hillary Clinton's campaign as part of opposition research on Donald Trump.

And that they are going to prosecute or try to a man who is not a citizen of the USA. Yet if they were, would not they had at least started the extradition proceedings in Great Britain for the man?



posted on Feb, 5 2018 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: sdcigarpig

You don't have to fly to Europe. They have these new things now, called telephones, and email.

Seriously?



posted on Feb, 5 2018 @ 03:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mach2
a reply to: sdcigarpig

You don't have to fly to Europe. They have these new things now, called telephones, and email.

Seriously?

At this point, I'm wondering if any part the dossier actually did come from Russian sources, or if it all came from the Dems, with Steele being paid to present it as legitimate intelligence work.



posted on Feb, 5 2018 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mach2
a reply to: bmullini

It is a tangled web isn't it?

I really fail to see how any rational person can give any credence at all to Steele, or the dossier, given what we now know.

Ppl need to see past the Trump hate.Don't they realize that the FBI used false, or at the very least unverified, information to secure a FISA warrant to spy on a US citizen? Don't they realize what a dangerous precedent this would set?

It shouldn't be a partisan issue. It erodes the foundation of our republic, as well as our Constitution.




Not only once but several times!

The problem with the FISA court is that they only denied 12 warrants out of almost 34,000 applications.

So the bar seems pretty low for a secret court that can break the 4th amendment.


edit on 2 5 2018 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 5 2018 @ 09:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: JBurns

What part of the dossier was discredited??

Now I am not saying it has all been confirmed, but I have not seen any instance where the dossier claimed trump was in place “X”, but there is proof he was really in a different country, or something else that shows it was false..


The fact that it makes abnormal claims about trump liking to be urinated on , is not proof it isn’t true.. people have way crazier fetishes than that..

That is the only thing I have heard saying that “discredits” the dossier.. which it doesn’t.. we have no idea what ANYONES private fetishs are..


The fact that it was paid for by an anti-trump conservative group, then the contract was picked up by the DNC doesn’t discredit anything..


Just because the evidence came from someone who doesn’t like you doesn’t discredit it..

It means you should check harder.. but it doesn’t mean it is inherently a lie..




I don’t see how any Liberal can try to keep the failed, 100% false dossier narrative going any longer.
It really takes a special kind of derangement to keep pushing it.
Utterly beyond comprehension.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 12:19 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

So seeing new information about Carter Page reported today:

townhall.com...

www.americanthinker.com...

Seems the surveillance on Page in 2013 was because he made contact with two Russian spies. When the FBI interviewed him, they believed that he believed he was talking to legitimate businessmen. Once it was known that they were spies, he worked with the FBI to obtain evidence and convictions. Page was an "asset" in 2013. Fast forward to 2016, the easiest route for the FBI to obtain a warrant was Page. He had already been under surveillance before. Now more than ever, I think we need to see the entire documentation of the 2016 FISA warrant for Page. I am very curious as to what information was shared about Page.




top topics



 
26
<< 1   >>

log in

join