It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: JBurns
Anyone who thinks that memo "proved" anything is an idiot. It presented no evidence and all of its claims are vague and unverified.
Kind like the Russian investigation against our duly elected president?
No. Not like that at all since an investigation is a process to gather evidence to find a guilty party. At no point are investigators required to share their work with the public though. Investigations aren't to be helped along by the public's majority opinion you know?
Oh, and thanks for calling all those that voted for him idiots. It will help in the 2020 elections when the liberal mindset is truly revealed as deplorable.
Hmmm? Are you saying that all Trump supporters blindly believe that memo? Because I certainly didn't.
And this memo seems to be the first part of a continuing list of evidence coming out. It quite likely will lead to an investigation. But at least there is more substance to this memo and more easily qualified an researched for truth) that that beloved dossier that triggered this current year long presidential investigation that has currently revealed ZERO and cost taxpayers millions.
No it won't lead to any new investigations, but hey I'm sure you are just as eager to hear the Democratic rebuttal right? Though I wonder when Trump supporters started believing investigations were merited on public opinion about how much THEY think it is necessary and not so much the investigators.
originally posted by: The GUT
Your suggestion seems that we ignore it and find other ways to identify this greater evil.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: The GUT
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: JBurns
Anyone who thinks that memo "proved" anything is an idiot. It presented no evidence and all of its claims are vague and unverified.
Yeah all of us deplorable idiots who actually use logic and understand that the only real evidence of collusion and corruption is pointing at elements of the last administration. I'm more than happy to be called whatever since I'm on the right side if history. The evidence itself says so.
Logic isn't jumping to conclusions because a piece of paper was written that you agree with.
Especially when it is called a "dossier", huh?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: The GUT
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: JBurns
Anyone who thinks that memo "proved" anything is an idiot. It presented no evidence and all of its claims are vague and unverified.
Yeah all of us deplorable idiots who actually use logic and understand that the only real evidence of collusion and corruption is pointing at elements of the last administration. I'm more than happy to be called whatever since I'm on the right side if history. The evidence itself says so.
Logic isn't jumping to conclusions because a piece of paper was written that you agree with.
Especially when it is called a "dossier", huh?
I didn't say how I felt about the contents of the dossier. I haven't read it personally. You have a knack for writing my arguments for me. How about I shutup and you just argue with yourself then since you have no interest in actually reading and understanding what I've written?
Anyone who thinks that memo "proved" anything is an idiot. It presented no evidence and all of its claims are vague and unverified.
No it won't lead to any new investigations
Maybe you should try reading the source material people are so critical of?
What exactly have I projected in this thread outside of a doubt for the info written within the memo? A memo that I read myself and came to the conclusion the information within isn't properly verified and excessively vague all on my own.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: JBurns
So......basically, the leftist MSM is a tool of the Deep State?
Never thought of it that way.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: JBurns
Anyone who thinks that memo "proved" anything is an idiot. It presented no evidence and all of its claims are vague and unverified.
Kind like the Russian investigation against our duly elected president?
No. Not like that at all since an investigation is a process to gather evidence to find a guilty party. At no point are investigators required to share their work with the public though. Investigations aren't to be helped along by the public's majority opinion you know?
Oh, and thanks for calling all those that voted for him idiots. It will help in the 2020 elections when the liberal mindset is truly revealed as deplorable.
Hmmm? Are you saying that all Trump supporters blindly believe that memo? Because I certainly didn't.
And this memo seems to be the first part of a continuing list of evidence coming out. It quite likely will lead to an investigation. But at least there is more substance to this memo and more easily qualified an researched for truth) that that beloved dossier that triggered this current year long presidential investigation that has currently revealed ZERO and cost taxpayers millions.
No it won't lead to any new investigations, but hey I'm sure you are just as eager to hear the Democratic rebuttal right? Though I wonder when Trump supporters started believing investigations were merited on public opinion about how much THEY think it is necessary and not so much the investigators.
"So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the FISA process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower. The dossier has nothing to with the email sent to Cambridge Analytica. The dossier really has nothing to do with George Papadopolous' meeting in Great Britain. It also has nothing to do with obstruction of justice," Gowdy said.
Other Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee echoed Gowdy in Sunday show appearances.
"This memo has frankly nothing at all to do with a special counsel," said Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, on Fox News Sunday.
"I don't believe this is an attack on Bob Mueller. I don't believe this is an attack on the men and women in the FBI. I've served shoulder to shoulder with them and they are hard-working folks that keep us safe," said Rep. Will Hurd, R-Texas on ABC's This Week.
Speaking Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press, John Brennan the former CIA director under former President Barack Obama, accused Nunes of playing politics with the release of the memo.
"Devin Nunes, over the past several months, all the way back to the spring of last year I think has engaged in these tactics, purely to defend, makes excuses and try to protect Mr. Trump," Brennan said.
Brennan also downplayed the amount of influence the dossier had among those in intelligence circles.
"It did not play any role whatsoever in the intelligence community assessments that was done that was presented to then President Obama and then President-elect Trump."
originally posted by: Thorneblood
a reply to: projectvxn
There is clearly more to the story than the 4 pages we've been shown lead you to believe, and whatever treasonous acts those who were mentioned commited wont lead to a conviction if the core aspects of the investigation are proven true.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Thorneblood
a reply to: projectvxn
There is clearly more to the story than the 4 pages we've been shown lead you to believe, and whatever treasonous acts those who were mentioned commited wont lead to a conviction if the core aspects of the investigation are proven true.
So treasonous acts are okay if it gets Trump from office.
That is my "shocked" face.
Totally agree with this sentiment. When it seemed there may be a shred of truth to Trump collusion with the Ruskies, Republicans were for an impartial investigation.
originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: network dude
If a person sees something like that happening in its own country and still do not get upset and pissed of about it, then there's no point in arguing with this person.
Just sad.
originally posted by: jimmyx
questions for all of you.......how do you think our government finds out about foreign espionage against America in foreign countries?.....do you think the CIA reads the local papers in those countries to gather intel?....or, do you think the "agents" develop intel from local "friendlies"?