It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
Interestingly, if Nunes really wanted to do “oversight” and was worried about the process, he could have followed regular oversight procedures. This isn’t about oversight, however, it is about partisan politics and a scheme to protect a President.
If the Woods procedure has not been adequately followed, that is easy to correct.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
Interestingly, if Nunes really wanted to do “oversight” and was worried about the process, he could have followed regular oversight procedures. This isn’t about oversight, however, it is about partisan politics and a scheme to protect a President.
If the Woods procedure has not been adequately followed, that is easy to correct.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: network dude
the big picture is, this isn't up to you, me, nor anyone else here.
Goes without saying, doesn't it?
From what I see from your posts, is you don't think the "D's" did anything wrong, and the "R's" are just making stuff up.
This is really interesting in what it reveals about how you're approaching this. Who exactly are the "D's" here? The FBI = Democrats? It's almost like in your mind, the FBI has morphed into the Democratic Party.
I think it's worth looking into but I don't see any concrete evidence of impropriety. Nunes is a Trump stooge and a hack. He's not the entire Republican Party though.
It's up to the investigation committee that will be formed and look really deep into all this.
This is just starting, and it's too far along to just ignore it at this point.
Time will tell, and we have lots of it.
I'm sure you're very excited about lots of investigations that you're hoping will serve your partisan desires. That's a normal enough thing. Just remember that you said all this when it comes to investigations into Russian interference and the possibility of collusion with the Trump campaign.
We've got all the time in the world. Certainly no need for right-wing partisans to declare arbitrary time limits on any of them, particularly the Mueller investigation right?
originally posted by: theantediluvian
How much is this dead horse of a talking point going to get beaten? James Comey was refer to parts of the dossier having to do with Trump, particularly referencing the pee-pee incident which again, is the *only* part of the dossier which could be described as "salacious."
originally posted by: bluechevytree
a reply to: DanteGaland
In their minds they didn`t have to be careful or follow procedures because Hillary was suppose to win and she was going to cover their butts,nobody was ever suppose to find out that they cut corners and broke laws.
- Hillary Clinton
If that f***** wins, we all hang.
And lets not forget that most people now admit that Muellers investigation in now off of looking for trump collusion with russia, but now on to obstruction of justice.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Grambler
And lets not forget that most people now admit that Muellers investigation in now off of looking for trump collusion with russia, but now on to obstruction of justice.
That's what they call moving goal posts.
They are trying to pin something on Trump.
ANYTHING.