It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House Intelligence FISA memo released: What it says

page: 72
169
<< 69  70  71    73  74 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

You get paid by the word?
The only known fact is that they are judges and you are a nobody. I believe the judges did their job. Maybe the dossier didn’t mean anything to their decision.




posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 03:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

How do you know facts about a secret court?



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 03:22 PM
link   



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn

But the public is not allowed to attend the court proceedings. The court proceedings aren’t opened to public. The records are classified. Have you read the original warrant, was in the court, or read the court transcripts? You don’t know anything.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 03:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: face23785

You get paid by the word?
The only known fact is that they are judges and you are a nobody. I believe the judges did their job. Maybe the dossier didn’t mean anything to their decision.


Where did I claim the judges didn't do their job? Did I type so much you couldn't read it all? I never said that or even implied it. As has been explained to you by several people now, the judges only know what they're presented by the FBI. They're not omnipotent. They don't know everything. Based on information even the Democrats aren't disputing, the judges were not presented with important information that should've been included. Face it, your pipe dream of Trump getting impeached is going down in flames.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: projectvxn

But the public is not allowed to attend the court proceedings. The court proceedings aren’t opened to public. The records are classified. Have you read the original warrant, was in the court, or read the court transcripts? You don’t know anything.


The post you responded to dealt only with proceedure. They tell you that procedure. There are laws in place, in public record, that mandate how the court will work.

They even have a public website.

No we are not privy to the details of cases. But we are being made privy to the behavior of the FBI and how they obtained what they gave to the FISA court.
edit on 6 2 18 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 03:56 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn

It’s what you choose to believe or spread. Like pizzagate.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

You don’t know what evidence the judges received or which ones they judged relevant.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 04:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: projectvxn

It’s what you choose to believe or spread. Like pizzagate.


What does pizza gate have to do with this discussion?

I wasn't actually involved in any of that. So I don't understand the accusations.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 04:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: face23785

You don’t know what evidence the judges received or which ones they judged relevant.


Except the Democrats aren't disputing the fact that the judges weren't told Clinton and the DNC were the ultimate source of the dossier. They paid for it. That wasn't told to the FISA court. The Democrats only rebuttal to that was that there was a vague footnote referencing political entities were involved with some of the material. This has been explained to you about 6 different ways now, and your only recourse is to pretend I said the judge didn't do his/her job and that I have to have read the entire application personally to know this. Neither of those things are true, they're as baseless as the myth you've believed for over a year now and are so attached to you have to ignore information that contradicts it. We know this because the Democrats aren't disputing it, despite the fact that it is a big problem for them. I'm sorry, you gotta grow up someday. Might as well be today. Santa isn't real, and Trump isn't going anywhere.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck
IMO

That is evidence that he was a paid under cover employee to the FBI.


edit on 2 6 2018 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

The democrats were not in court when the evidence and warrants were being judged either. That’s why this whole thing is stupid.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 05:08 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn

You are only repeating rumors as fact. You were not in the secret court.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 05:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: RadioRobert

You know the judges? And all the evidence? You were there to witness court proceedings?


No, and neither were you! That's why people want to see the warrant!



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: RadioRobert

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: RadioRobert

You know the judges? And all the evidence? You were there to witness court proceedings?


No, and neither were you! That's why people want to see the warrant!

It is now on the lap of the president. It is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. If he does not release it, he will be accused of a cover-up, and the memo will be leaked anyway. If he does release it, he will probably need to walk back his crazy rhetoric, and Nunes may need to resign.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: face23785

You get paid by the word?
The only known fact is that they are judges and you are a nobody. I believe the judges did their job. Maybe the dossier didn’t mean anything to their decision.




Appeal to authority much?

That's why the FBI used it for every warrant.

The judge "was recused" who signed the first one, if I recall, he didn't recuse himself.

He was fired, what's up with that?

Judge Contreras? Sp.

They judge shopped.








posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy


The Special Counsel will get to the bottom of this...and much more.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 07:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: face23785

The democrats were not in court when the evidence and warrants were being judged either. That’s why this whole thing is stupid.



Who was the lawyer the FBI went to the court with?

He/she should be disbarred.




posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: projectvxn

You are only repeating rumors as fact. You were not in the secret court.


New thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There was no corroborating information and the dossier was the only evidence used to obtain the FISA warrants. The court was not notified of material facts related to who was behind the dossier or who paid for it. They used the media reports by Yahoo as "corroboration" as well as to explain away discrepancies in the application.Comey tried to pass it off to the Senate intel committee as the FBI used Steele in the past and his information was reliable.
10 page memo posted in new thread.
edit on 6-2-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:27 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

I think that there is more to this than we are being told. Comey had information on both investigations.




top topics



 
169
<< 69  70  71    73  74 >>

log in

join