It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Sillyolme
Right.
I keep posting it, but people believe what they want to believe.
From the same testimony where Comey said certain parts were salacious and unverified.
was the FBI able to confirm any criminal allegations contained in the Steele document?
COMEY: Mr. Chairman, I don’t think that’s a question I can answer in an open setting because it goes into the details of the investigation.
www.redstate.com...
originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: soberbacchus
Of course the Investigation into the 2016 Election will continue. The dossier is meaningless and a distraction. Their focus is not solely on Trump. Their focus is on the many other paths that they are discovering. I am personally in support of Mueller's investigation for I believe in the end, it will be useful in draining the swamp across all parties!
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Sillyolme
Right.
I keep posting it, but people believe what they want to believe.
From the same testimony where Comey said certain parts were salacious and unverified.
was the FBI able to confirm any criminal allegations contained in the Steele document?
COMEY: Mr. Chairman, I don’t think that’s a question I can answer in an open setting because it goes into the details of the investigation.
www.redstate.com...
So comey admitting there were parts that were salacious and unverified is damning, because it admits the document wasnt fully vetted.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: soberbacchus
Of course they should investigate Russian meddling. But it has nothing to do with Trump.
A complete clean-up will take time because it will take time to find suitable (baggage-free) replacements. I believe the phrase used was "people of impeccable character
originally posted by: Grambler
The issue is that Comey admitted there was parts of the dossier that were slacious and unverified.
The threshold for using this document as the impetus for spying on an ameircan should be very high, particularly because it was to spy on a Presidential candidates team member, and the info was from that canidates opponent.
So comey admitting there were parts that were salacious and unverified is damning, because it admits the document wasnt fully vetted.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Sillyolme
Right.
I keep posting it, but people believe what they want to believe.
From the same testimony where Comey said certain parts were salacious and unverified.
was the FBI able to confirm any criminal allegations contained in the Steele document?
COMEY: Mr. Chairman, I don’t think that’s a question I can answer in an open setting because it goes into the details of the investigation.
www.redstate.com...
The issue is that Comey admitted there was parts of the dossier that were slacious and unverified.
The threshold for using this document as the impetus for spying on an ameircan should be very high, particularly because it was to spy on a Presidential candidates team member, and the info was from that canidates opponent.
So comey admitting there were parts that were salacious and unverified is damning, because it admits the document wasnt fully vetted.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Sillyolme
Right.
I keep posting it, but people believe what they want to believe.
From the same testimony where Comey said certain parts were salacious and unverified.
was the FBI able to confirm any criminal allegations contained in the Steele document?
COMEY: Mr. Chairman, I don’t think that’s a question I can answer in an open setting because it goes into the details of the investigation.
www.redstate.com...
So comey admitting there were parts that were salacious and unverified is damning, because it admits the document wasnt fully vetted.
No. The standard is not to verify the entirety of the intelligence originating from a source before taking any of it credibly, the standard is to verify the relevant portions (Carter Page).
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: Grambler
The issue is that Comey admitted there was parts of the dossier that were slacious and unverified.
The threshold for using this document as the impetus for spying on an ameircan should be very high, particularly because it was to spy on a Presidential candidates team member, and the info was from that canidates opponent.
So comey admitting there were parts that were salacious and unverified is damning, because it admits the document wasnt fully vetted.
?? I thought the original document mentioned that parts of the information came from sources that seemed reliable but that could not be verified. Such as the hooker story.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Sillyolme
Right.
I keep posting it, but people believe what they want to believe.
From the same testimony where Comey said certain parts were salacious and unverified.
was the FBI able to confirm any criminal allegations contained in the Steele document?
COMEY: Mr. Chairman, I don’t think that’s a question I can answer in an open setting because it goes into the details of the investigation.
www.redstate.com...
So comey admitting there were parts that were salacious and unverified is damning, because it admits the document wasnt fully vetted.
No. The standard is not to verify the entirety of the intelligence originating from a source before taking any of it credibly, the standard is to verify the relevant portions (Carter Page).
Incorrect.
Why would the FBI use a dossier that they knew came from the opponent of the people they were trying to spy on,
that they knew that was mostly unverified,
and that had parts that they knew were false,
if they had verified other info about Page.
They would have skipped out on the dossier entirely, and instead used the info they had that was verified.
The allegations in the memo, if they are true, show that instead the fbi had to rely on the dossier,
Not only that, it seems that they did not tell the court that the dossier was paid for by hillarys team.
Why add the extra step of the controversial dossier if they had other sources that showed what page did?
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Sillyolme
Right.
I keep posting it, but people believe what they want to believe.
From the same testimony where Comey said certain parts were salacious and unverified.
was the FBI able to confirm any criminal allegations contained in the Steele document?
COMEY: Mr. Chairman, I don’t think that’s a question I can answer in an open setting because it goes into the details of the investigation.
www.redstate.com...
The issue is that Comey admitted there was parts of the dossier that were slacious and unverified.
The threshold for using this document as the impetus for spying on an ameircan should be very high, particularly because it was to spy on a Presidential candidates team member, and the info was from that canidates opponent.
So comey admitting there were parts that were salacious and unverified is damning, because it admits the document wasnt fully vetted.
According to the head of the counterintelligence division, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, corroboration of the Steele dossier was in its “infancy” at the time of the initial Page FISA application.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
Hard ot take you seriously when you are trying to say the inveiried parts of the dossier were just spelling errors.
Unbelievable.