It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sdcigarpig
a reply to: RadioRobert
Yes they did vote, however, Nunes, did not answer questions. That is a problem.
Yes this information is classified, but you know, the President can easily say, it is to be released and to declassify that information. And as the President is empowered by the constitution to do such, then having a hearing on classified information, namely within this context around the memo, it would not be a problem.
originally posted by: sdcigarpig
a reply to: RadioRobert
Yes they did vote, however, Nunes, did not answer questions. That is a problem.
Yes this information is classified, but you know, the President can easily say, it is to be released and to declassify that information. And as the President is empowered by the constitution to do such, then having a hearing on classified information, namely within this context around the memo, it would not be a problem.
originally posted by: sdcigarpig
a reply to: RadioRobert
Yes they did vote, however, Nunes, did not answer questions. That is a problem.
Yes this information is classified, but you know, the President can easily say, it is to be released and to declassify that information. And as the President is empowered by the constitution to do such, then having a hearing on classified information, namely within this context around the memo, it would not be a problem.
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: soberbacchus
You're still talking about Hillary. She's the one who claims someone is always out to get her, every time her far-left radical BS feminist agenda gets shot down by the majority.
Get over it. We don't want that agenda. We don't want those politics, and we most certainly do not want Hillary. I don't even want her in this country, but I'll settle for keeping her out of the WH/future publicserviceexploitation
originally posted by: WhatTheory
originally posted by: Scrubdog
You do know you're not "the majority," correct?
You're funny!
Twisted and absolutely out of touch but funny! LOL
originally posted by: sdcigarpig
a reply to: RadioRobert
Yes they did vote, however, Nunes, did not answer questions. That is a problem.
Yes this information is classified, but you know, the President can easily say, it is to be released and to declassify that information. And as the President is empowered by the constitution to do such, then having a hearing on classified information, namely within this context around the memo, it would not be a problem.
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a story Feb. 2 about a Republican memo on the Russia investigation, The Associated Press erroneously reported that a former British spy’s work on an opposition research project was initially funded by the conservative Washington Free Beacon. Though the former spy, Christopher Steele, was hired by a firm that was initially funded by the Washington Free Beacon, he did not begin work on the project until after Democratic groups had begun funding it.
originally posted by: ausername
Anyone seen this?
apnews.com...
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a story Feb. 2 about a Republican memo on the Russia investigation, The Associated Press erroneously reported that a former British spy’s work on an opposition research project was initially funded by the conservative Washington Free Beacon. Though the former spy, Christopher Steele, was hired by a firm that was initially funded by the Washington Free Beacon, he did not begin work on the project until after Democratic groups had begun funding it.
Minor correction?
originally posted by: talisman
Bottom line. Even if one doesn't want to accept the facts of the Memo, Comey/Mccabe used the Dossier despite it being known as something having salicious and unverified claims. That is fraud on the court. Did they tell the court it was unverified?
originally posted by: WhatTheory
originally posted by: Scrubdog
You're not in the majority, whether you like it or not.
Whatever makes you laugh.
Okay, whatever you say professor. LOL
originally posted by: Scrubdog
originally posted by: WhatTheory
originally posted by: Scrubdog
You're not in the majority, whether you like it or not.
Whatever makes you laugh.
Okay, whatever you say professor. LOL
Trump got more votes than Hillary?
Trump's approval ratings are higher than 50%?
LOL LOL LOL LOL
Keep LOL'ing till your boy is in jail, LOL.
Never mind, I forgot. You're using Russian math. Putin's vote counts 50.1%, so you are correct by your way of numbers.
And thanks for the compliment. In much of the world professors and teachers are very respected.
Well it's going to be really simple then...Provide those things that were not in the memo and this will all be straightened out...
originally posted by: Scrubdog
originally posted by: talisman
Bottom line. Even if one doesn't want to accept the facts of the Memo, Comey/Mccabe used the Dossier despite it being known as something having salicious and unverified claims. That is fraud on the court. Did they tell the court it was unverified?
No, it is not "fraud on the court" - I really doubt you have ever seen a PC affidavit in your entire life.
I love listening to the Hannity Calamity Army play justice warriors.
FWIW: The WaPo thoroughly documented that the FISA court well-knew that - to the extent the dossier was used - it was in part paid for the by the Clinton campaign.
FWIW2: These "fraud upon the court" claims are the stuff that would go away immediately were the FBI and Dems allowed to set out the "omitted" facts which was the the primary concern of the intel community and Dems, not what was IN the memo so much as what WAS NOT in the memo, those things that would demonstrate that no fraud was put upon any court.
Just go and cut/paste from RT. They are by-far the biggest Trump supporters on the planet, support Trump second only to Putin. www.rt.com...
Of course, doing so would force an intellectually honest person to ask why RT is so heavily in favor of Trump against the U.S. intelligence services. Why do you suppose that is?
originally posted by: keenmachine
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: TheLead
The only thing mildly interesting in this nothing burger of a memo was FISA not being told it was politically funded.
That turned out to be a bald faced lie.
I give it a week before Donald starts tweeting about how Nunes is a Democrat Plant made to embarrass him.
I gotta give you credit in this thread you have made alot of posts about this subject, most have received no stars with a few getting one star as if little or no one agrees with what you are saying.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: keenmachine
originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: TheLead
The only thing mildly interesting in this nothing burger of a memo was FISA not being told it was politically funded.
That turned out to be a bald faced lie.
I give it a week before Donald starts tweeting about how Nunes is a Democrat Plant made to embarrass him.
I gotta give you credit in this thread you have made alot of posts about this subject, most have received no stars with a few getting one star as if little or no one agrees with what you are saying.
If ever I find myself searching for popularity and affirmation vis-à-vis little stars on an anonymous internet board I will seek professional help.
Truth is not a popularity contest, nor should it be.
originally posted by: Scrubdog
FWIW: The WaPo thoroughly documented that the FISA court well-knew that - to the extent the dossier was used - it was in part paid for the by the Clinton campaign.