It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House Intelligence FISA memo released: What it says

page: 5
169
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I believe this may be the actual MEMO...

Going to be interesting to see the fallout!!




posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


The fisa court had no idea that the application was based on a dossier that was funded by the dnc. Is this correct?



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: lostbook

That's not a link.


It's not the actual memo but the reporting that it has been released.



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

It means they obtained a fisa warrant through fraudulent court documents to spy on a presidential candidate and his staff.



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: Grambler


The fisa court had no idea that the application was based on a dossier that was funded by the dnc. Is this correct?


The judge was lied to.



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:34 AM
link   

Finally, the memo released today does not represent the sum total of what House investigators have learned in their review of the FBI and Justice Department Trump-Russia investigation. That means the fight over the memo could be replayed in the future when the Intelligence Committee decides to release more information.


What's the smell ?



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:34 AM
link   



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:35 AM
link   
I just read the memo.

If someone else has read it...

Could you tell me why the Intelligence Community was demanding that all the names be redacted???


+13 more 
posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:36 AM
link   
So, basically, under Obama, the FBI used Hilary operative's statement to get a warrant to spy on Trump?

Doomed.



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96


Finally, the memo released today does not represent the sum total of what House investigators have learned in their review of the FBI and Justice Department Trump-Russia investigation. That means the fight over the memo could be replayed in the future when the Intelligence Committee decides to release more information.


What's the smell ?

We need wide open hearings and TRIALS.

Everything needs to see the light of day!


+2 more 
posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
I just read the memo.

If someone else has read it...

Could you tell me why the Intelligence Community was demanding that all the names be redacted???




Clearly, it was purely a Cover Your Azz motivation.



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:36 AM
link   
I am still confused. I am guessing I am just listening to raw data. I kinda need to figure out what this memo says..


+1 more 
posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nikola014
So, basically, under Obama, the FBI used Hilary operative's statement to get a warrant to spy on Trump?

Doomed.


That's it in a nutshell.



+6 more 
posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:37 AM
link   


As required by statute (50 U.S.C. a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the ISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications . in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more

names named
they are screwed


+9 more 
posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: Grambler


The fisa court had no idea that the application was based on a dossier that was funded by the dnc. Is this correct?


The judge was lied to.


by the FBI!!!

That's the issue!!





posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:37 AM
link   
To all of those calling this the end of the Democratic Party,
What is gained by losing a political party?

Power is centralized into ONLY the Republican Party?

How is it a good thing to have only one major political party?

Communists, the National Socialists of Germany (yeah, those guys), and quite a few other countries went the one party route...With the "death" of the Democratic Party, do we get to add Republicans to such an esteemed list?

I'm not saying justice should not be carried out, it should, and accountability is a word foreign to ALL in DC. And I wish the two big parties would split into two or three parties each with an independent presence and electorate.

Whatever happens, can we all try to be civil? Talk things out rather than going "Nyah, nyah, nyah!!! My side wins!" We all lose when this sort of thing happens.


+2 more 
posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: Grambler


The fisa court had no idea that the application was based on a dossier that was funded by the dnc. Is this correct?


The judge was lied to.

Judges don't like that.

Unless they are Hillary co-conspirators.

Then they don't like it when everyone finds out about it.



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:38 AM
link   
Choo choo....all aboard the hype train to nowheresville...with stops at let down station and disappointed blvd.

Maybe the 60 page version will have some more meat cause all this is gonna do is whet the appetites of trumps base while they gnaw these scraps.

So much for transparency.



posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:38 AM
link   
IS IT GETTING HOT IN HEEGH?


+15 more 
posted on Feb, 2 2018 @ 11:38 AM
link   
Trump haters went above and beyond NIXON!

To the moon,and beyond.

Dossiergate!



new topics

top topics



 
169
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join