It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: underwerks
Is that right!?
Let me direct you to Xcath's comment, it is nice and succinct!
originally posted by: Xcathdra
So there was no other source information used in conjunction with the dossier. The dossier ALONE was used to obtain the FISA warrant - ILLEGALLY.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
I tell this to my kids all the time, "You can't trust the Government. I know I sound crazy ; But it's true. You can't just trust the Government, because it's made up of people."
originally posted by: luthier
6 unanswered questions.
Most of which could be cleared up if we are allowed to see the evidence.
www.dailywire.com...
I'm not sure it's accurate that the dossier was the lone evidence presented to the FISC.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: soberbacchus
I can't answer that, and yes it was verified ; Are not the same thing.
While I might be confused, it does happen I cannot deny it ; I am not a liar.
Transcript Comey Testimony
At the time of your departure from the FBI, was the FBI able to confirm any criminal allegations contained in the steel document?
COMEY: Mr. Chairman, I don't think that's a question I can answer in an open setting because it goes into the details of the investigation
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: face23785
I'm not sure it's accurate that the dossier was the lone evidence presented to the FISC.
As I understand it, McCabe stated under oath that the FISA warrant would not have been approved without the Steele dossier. Am I mistaken on this?
TheRedneck
originally posted by: Painterz
Yeah, this is just a memo, no facts, just opinions of the guy who wrote the memo.
I need to see more facts than this to be impressed?
It looks like just an attempt to sway popular opinion.
Why is Trump so afraid of the investigation into him that he's resorting to all this?
Yes. An oppo hit piece created by a man who hated Trump, paid for by political opponents (and the FBI?), sold by the people who hired the wife of a senior Justice official concurrently, and whose verification was so weak it apparently references an online news bit leaked by the same creator as "evidence" of veracity.
It's sort of a Big deal. Not as BIG(currently) as people were perhaps hoping/fearing, but Big. Enough to warrant independent investigation. I look forward to seeing the Dem memo and what, if anything, the FBI and Justice are able to provide to give us the "context" we are missing.
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
The Right: this is the smoking gun
The Left: This is nothing, we have the smoking gun about "muh Russia hysteria"
The Right: That is nothing we have the smoking gun, here is proof
The Left: that is fake news we have the smoking gun, here is the proof
etc
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RadioRobert
Yes. An oppo hit piece created by a man who hated Trump, paid for by political opponents (and the FBI?), sold by the people who hired the wife of a senior Justice official concurrently, and whose verification was so weak it apparently references an online news bit leaked by the same creator as "evidence" of veracity.
It was not a hit piece. It was an opposition research piece that was not meant for public publication. A hit piece is.
It's sort of a Big deal. Not as BIG(currently) as people were perhaps hoping/fearing, but Big. Enough to warrant independent investigation. I look forward to seeing the Dem memo and what, if anything, the FBI and Justice are able to provide to give us the "context" we are missing.
Yes, context is a big deal.
I think we should look for proper context before we jump too far.
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
The Right: this is the smoking gun
The Left: This is nothing, we have the smoking gun about "muh Russia hysteria"
The Right: That is nothing we have the smoking gun, here is proof
The Left: that is fake news we have the smoking gun, here is the proof
etc
Why is Trump so afraid of the investigation into him that he's resorting to all this?
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RadioRobert
Yes. An oppo hit piece created by a man who hated Trump, paid for by political opponents (and the FBI?), sold by the people who hired the wife of a senior Justice official concurrently, and whose verification was so weak it apparently references an online news bit leaked by the same creator as "evidence" of veracity.
It was not a hit piece. It was an opposition research piece that was not meant for public publication. A hit piece is.
It's sort of a Big deal. Not as BIG(currently) as people were perhaps hoping/fearing, but Big. Enough to warrant independent investigation. I look forward to seeing the Dem memo and what, if anything, the FBI and Justice are able to provide to give us the "context" we are missing.
Yes, context is a big deal.
I think we should look for proper context before we jump too far.
Trumps certain agenda the past year has been to convince as many people as possible that feelings and opinions are more important than facts.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Painterz
Why is Trump so afraid of the investigation into him that he's resorting to all this?
The Democrats' corresponding memo will be released soon enough. It has to go through the exact same process, which has already been started.
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: Wayfarer
Yeah, that must have been it, which would also explain how the original FISA warrant was signed years before Steele's portion of the document was included.......
Which demonstrates the failure of any agency to act in a timely manner,
The FBI had all of this information years ago, way before Trump was on the scene.
The only explanation is the Special Counsel is The Insurance Policy
that was tossed out in Andrew McCabes office.
Time will prove this, wait and see.