It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
C'mon Hillary...It's not going to work...
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
When was the last time we prosecuted a bigwig politician for a clerical error???
Because that’s what the “hillary’s Private server” stuff is.. a clerical error, not a moral crime...
All hillary actually did was fail to swap to a government server when whatever memo to do so was put out..
Hillary’s server predated the policy that all government documents were to be kept on government servers..
She and her server predated a time when EVERY bigwig has their own server..
Colin Powell, everyone in the Bush Jr. administration, exc, exc....
So on what planet is failing to swap to a government server a hell worthy trespass, when private servers were common place ????
That’s not a moral crime, that is a loop hole or a clerical error..
I really hate defending hillary.. no one likes her..
But pretending she should be locked up , or that the fbi should have indicted her over a clerical error is just nuts?!?!
It’s crazy..
Bush lied us into the Iraq war . Then gave his private company the bajillion dollar rebuild contract.. that is a moral crime...
Nixon obstructed Justice after setting up a burglary...that’s a moral crime..
Not swapping servers when a memo came out to do so....
It just blows my mind that people are acting like this is ANYTHING that a politician has EVER been convicted over..
So if that’s the case, then that means the “fbi was covering for hillary” is garbage...
The fbi wouldn’t have prosecuted ANY politician for not swapping to a government server..
The propaganda runs strong with these ones...
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: NightCall
A) you don’t know what she knew. Tech is not an old people skill usually. Hillary doesn’t maintain her own servers.. IT guys do.. so we don’t know how “important “ the memo to swap servers was in her life..
It could have beenthe tech guy who ignored it. Anything is speculation..
B) So none of the people you mentioned were prosecuted then right???
So on what planet should they be prosecuting hillary , when even your average soldier is only reprimanded or loses rank??
Prosecuting hillary as the first senator in history to be prosecuted for a procedural error, would be biased..
I never said
In Canada, we still preserve the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise. Have you guys repealed that notion?
originally posted by: tadaman
A whistle blower get assassinated and you protect the probably guilty party out of the benefit of the doubt, though undeserved.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: DanDanDat
A) I should have said “procedural error” the term escaped me when writing the OP..
B) When has ANY senator in American history been prosecuted for an equal or lesser crime??
When has a senator been prosecuted for a procedural error??
Never, ever in all of Americans can history..
So the FBI would be going against the status quo to prosecute her for it. They would be setting the precedent..
So in no way are the fbi being biased by doing the status quo..
C) do you really think hillary does her own IT set-up and maintenance?!?!
Hell, no..
So did she specifically order her it guy not to swap??
Did The it guy get the message??
Did The IT guy decide he was too lazy, or that the government servers encryption wasn’t as hard core as his???
There are agajillion possibilities and the vast majority do not include malfeasance..
People are hoping tptb will prosecute a senator for a paperwork error with out ANY evidence of malicious intent.
I often ask myself if a conspiracy site is the wrong place to expect people to be logical...
Why would you encourage the erosion of the rule of law in your country. Just because it satisfies your notions? Bit of a slippery slope, there. That's how fascism happens.
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
Why would I extend that courtesy in this atmosphere of toxic rhetoric, speculation, and rampant disregard for logical fact checking?