It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Gothmog
Secretary of State IS NOT DoJ . Talking about needing to understand...
The DoJ practices in how they prosecute or approach those that violated the laws, is what I was referring to.
Reading is fundamental.
I read. Secretary of State is not DoJ
You inferred that the SoS abides by rules and regulations of the DoJ ?
Reading your OWN POSTS is more fundamental...
Ok. Here is what I posted:
What we need to understand is how those rules apply and how the practices employed at the DoJ deal with such issues.
How the DoJ deals with these issues. I did not say or infer the SoS worked at the DoJ.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Gothmog
Secretary of State IS NOT DoJ . Talking about needing to understand...
The DoJ practices in how they prosecute or approach those that violated the laws, is what I was referring to.
Reading is fundamental.
I read. Secretary of State is not DoJ
You inferred that the SoS abides by rules and regulations of the DoJ ?
Reading your OWN POSTS is more fundamental...
Ok. Here is what I posted:
What we need to understand is how those rules apply and how the practices employed at the DoJ deal with such issues.
How the DoJ deals with these issues. I did not say or infer the SoS worked at the DoJ.
But Senate would hold sway there. Not the DoJ
Sorry , try again
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
When was the last time we prosecuted a bigwig politician for a clerical error???
Because that’s what the “hillary’s Private server” stuff is.. a clerical error, not a moral crime...
All hillary actually did was fail to swap to a government server when whatever memo to do so was put out..
Hillary’s server predated the policy that all government documents were to be kept on government servers..
She and her server predated a time when EVERY bigwig has their own server..
Colin Powell, everyone in the Bush Jr. administration, exc, exc....
So on what planet is failing to swap to a government server a hell worthy trespass, when private servers were common place ????
That’s not a moral crime, that is a loop hole or a clerical error..
I really hate defending hillary.. no one likes her..
But pretending she should be locked up , or that the fbi should have indicted her over a clerical error is just nuts?!?!
It’s crazy..
Bush lied us into the Iraq war . Then gave his private company the bajillion dollar rebuild contract.. that is a moral crime...
Nixon obstructed Justice after setting up a burglary...that’s a moral crime..
Not swapping servers when a memo came out to do so....
It just blows my mind that people are acting like this is ANYTHING that a politician has EVER been convicted over..
So if that’s the case, then that means the “fbi was covering for hillary” is garbage...
The fbi wouldn’t have prosecuted ANY politician for not swapping to a government server..
The propaganda runs strong with these ones...
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: RickinVa
Who decides if someone is prosecuted for felonies, the fbi or the doj?
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: JoshuaCox
She deleted evidence that had been subpeonaed, right? Wasn't there something about Bleachbit, StoneTear on Reddit asking how to remove headers, all that stuff?
Is that just a clerical error?
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
She then proceeded to violate every law and regulation concerning classified information.
Every law?
That seems to be a bit dramatic, not to mention false.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: JoshuaCox
She deleted evidence that had been subpeonaed, right? Wasn't there something about Bleachbit, StoneTear on Reddit asking how to remove headers, all that stuff?
Is that just a clerical error?
Sounds like a cover up to me boss.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: RickinVa
Isn't that the reason given in the recommendation for the former fbi director to be let go?
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
When was the last time we prosecuted a bigwig politician for a clerical error???
Because that’s what the “hillary’s Private server” stuff is.. a clerical error, not a moral crime...
All hillary actually did was fail to swap to a government server when whatever memo to do so was put out..
Hillary’s server predated the policy that all government documents were to be kept on government servers..
She and her server predated a time when EVERY bigwig has their own server..
Colin Powell, everyone in the Bush Jr. administration, exc, exc....
So on what planet is failing to swap to a government server a hell worthy trespass, when private servers were common place ????
That’s not a moral crime, that is a loop hole or a clerical error..
I really hate defending hillary.. no one likes her..
But pretending she should be locked up , or that the fbi should have indicted her over a clerical error is just nuts?!?!
It’s crazy..
Bush lied us into the Iraq war . Then gave his private company the bajillion dollar rebuild contract.. that is a moral crime...
Nixon obstructed Justice after setting up a burglary...that’s a moral crime..
Not swapping servers when a memo came out to do so....
It just blows my mind that people are acting like this is ANYTHING that a politician has EVER been convicted over..
So if that’s the case, then that means the “fbi was covering for hillary” is garbage...
The fbi wouldn’t have prosecuted ANY politician for not swapping to a government server..
The propaganda runs strong with these ones...
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
She then proceeded to violate every law and regulation concerning classified information.
Every law?
That seems to be a bit dramatic, not to mention false.
Cherry pick much? or would you like to deny that she wasn't aware of what classified information was because it wasn't marked?
If it makes you happy....she broke damn near every law and regulation concerning classified information.[