It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
We've moved on from that now. We went from:
Emails, emails, emails!
To:
Dossier, dossier, dossier!
And now:
Memo, memo, memo!
Nothing has come from any of them. I'm sure the next one well be the one to #LockHerUp
LOL
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
When was the last time we prosecuted a bigwig politician for a clerical error???
Bush lied us into the Iraq war . Then gave his private company the bajillion dollar rebuild contract..
The propaganda runs strong with these ones...
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: JoshuaCox
I have said this to you before, and I'll reiterate it, you don't understand any of this.
www.law.cornell.edu...
www.theguardian.com...
I don't expect someone who hasn't served or worked in the government to fully understand the rules and needs for security, comsec, opsec, or common sense in general, but that also doesn't excuse proliferating stupidity. Learn first, then speak.
The GOP has both houses, and the presidency. Supreme Court too? The Orange Messiah campaigned on 'Lock her up!'
originally posted by: openyourmind1262
If you "really hate defending her". Then don't. She's as crooked as a barrel of fish hooks.
Of course, this thread is basically a pitiful attempt at damage control.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: JoshuaCox
Funny you start this today eh
New Hillary Clinton emails released this morning foia.state.gov...
bunch of new releases from the SD
🙊🙉🙈
🤡
(D)-(D)ay any minute 🎻
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
The GOP has both houses, and the presidency. Supreme Court too? The Orange Messiah campaigned on 'Lock her up!'
originally posted by: openyourmind1262
If you "really hate defending her". Then don't. She's as crooked as a barrel of fish hooks.
So how come the lot of them are ignoring you?
You seem so sincere.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
When was the last time we prosecuted a bigwig politician for a clerical error???
Because that’s what the “hillary’s Private server” stuff is.. a clerical error, not a moral crime...
All hillary actually did was fail to swap to a government server when whatever memo to do so was put out..
Hillary’s server predated the policy that all government documents were to be kept on government servers..
She and her server predated a time when EVERY bigwig has their own server..
Colin Powell, everyone in the Bush Jr. administration, exc, exc....
So on what planet is failing to swap to a government server a hell worthy trespass, when private servers were common place ????
That’s not a moral crime, that is a loop hole or a clerical error..
I really hate defending hillary.. no one likes her..
But pretending she should be locked up , or that the fbi should have indicted her over a clerical error is just nuts?!?!
It’s crazy..
Bush lied us into the Iraq war . Then gave his private company the bajillion dollar rebuild contract.. that is a moral crime...
Nixon obstructed Justice after setting up a burglary...that’s a moral crime..
Not swapping servers when a memo came out to do so....
It just blows my mind that people are acting like this is ANYTHING that a politician has EVER been convicted over..
So if that’s the case, then that means the “fbi was covering for hillary” is garbage...
The fbi wouldn’t have prosecuted ANY politician for not swapping to a government server..
The propaganda runs strong with these ones...
originally posted by: Arnie123
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
The GOP has both houses, and the presidency. Supreme Court too? The Orange Messiah campaigned on 'Lock her up!'
originally posted by: openyourmind1262
If you "really hate defending her". Then don't. She's as crooked as a barrel of fish hooks.
So how come the lot of them are ignoring you?
You seem so sincere.
Thank you for letting us know about MAGA 🤗
I know this is your favorite talking point, but you are talking in circles as usual.
Most time cases like these are handled internally, but once they leave the realm of internal and are referred to the FBI, the results are vastly different.
I assume you are still on the point the the FBI investigation found no wrong doing, despite all the evidence to the contrary that the investigation was carried out improperly.
Carry on, you are doing a fine job of living in that bubble.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
I know this is your favorite talking point, but you are talking in circles as usual.
As we have learned from past experiences, you are not in a position to say such a thing. You were proven o be completely incorrect on the email issue.
Most time cases like these are handled internally, but once they leave the realm of internal and are referred to the FBI, the results are vastly different.
Source for that? The FBI itself has said differently. Specifically, look at what Comey had said.
I assume you are still on the point the the FBI investigation found no wrong doing, despite all the evidence to the contrary that the investigation was carried out improperly.
I've never said any such thing. The FBI did find wrongdoing. Problem is, they could not find intent.
Carry on, you are doing a fine job of living in that bubble.
Funny how I was correct on this issue, while living in a bubble, yet you worked at the FBI, though you have contradicted yourself on how long, yet you were still completely wrong.
originally posted by: Hewhowaits
How about we let her slide on the email/server "matter" in return for a real investigation into all the suicides and pay to play, or the uranium one deal, or the fake aids/hiv charity, or any of the thousands of shady things she's involved with?